Let the hype begin with the recent reviews lol
3 Likes
Next thing you know there will be a Panda Gang. 
3 Likes
Apparently thatās unicode. Thanks Joshua Valour, lol.
1 Like
Man, yeah so much hype. Hmmmm
2 Likes
Iāve never really understood closed-back portable headphones. Where are they useful compared to IEMs? Anywhere you go you would either need to hear the world around you to avoid dying, or theyād be too bulky to carry while youāre not listening to them.
Too much lol, I am really skeptical with some of the statement said so far lol. Iām sure itās good, but a lot of the claims give me pause in the z video. I think the fact that itās wireless, thx, and planar closed back is compounding the hype tbh. For an overall package for wireless Iām sure itās great, but pure sound I donāt know if it can hold up to the higher end closed backs already in the market
1 Like
Planesā¦ Crying babiesā¦ Lesley from Accounting that just does not shut up!!!
4 Likes
You never really were a fan of thx tech though right?
I think Joshās video might be the more well rounded review. I think his statement was that it was the best bluetooth headphone, but compared to wired closed backs in the same price range there are better sounding options.
Are you going to get a pair to try out though?
Iām not bashing thx here, just noting that when thx is mentioned hype does increase a fair bit.
Now thatās what I was expecting. DMS is also more reasonable in his review
I will try a pair when a friend gets his, but personally Iām not in the market for wireless
Ah didnāt mean to say that you were.
Cool, let us know your thoughts in like half a year. Lol
Am I the only one weirded out by the fact that they are doing indie go go cause they you knowā¦ Have drop.com but if itās for marketing I guess I can see whatās up
1 Like
Iām not really worried, most likely just more convenient for them with preorders
True. Indie go probably had a better infrastructure for that kinda stuff
I mean, selling āThe Worldās highest fidelity wireless headphonesā on Indiegogo is one hell of a great ad, too.
(79% backed alreadyā¦!)
Notice he said āin the 400$ price rangeāā¦ Early bird is 421$CAD for meā¦ So itās, 319$USD? For the lucky first 750 buyers.
Thatās a pretty good price especially for canada
for me it would be around 345 Euro incl. 19% tax - not bad, though skip this one this time.
somehow it does not catch me, while doing most things right on paper:
no ANC - makes it interesting in first place
ok passive isloation
passive mode - beeing able to shut off the DSP is gold
LDAC support
design is not screaming anything
no touch controls
Edit:
no negative points on paper
still not hyped
Thatās a win in my book lol
1 Like
Watching that review now. Z is certainly animated, but if you put an enthusiasm filter on what heās saying, I donāt find him to be far off the mark.
One of the most eyebrow-raising claims was that the Pandas compete with closed-backs under $1500. I donāt find that to be hyperbole, though it probably deserves more discussion. I brought Stellias to the Listening Event and my musician friend who attended with me said he couldnāt really tell the difference between those and the Pandas. Granted, there are a lot of mitigating circumstances behind that comment (non-ideal listening environment, very short comparison with insufficiently varied test tracks), but the takeaway here should be that the differences were not immediately glaringly obvious to an experienced listener.
Yes, the Stellias are better, but theyāre better in the same ways that differentiate summit-fi perfection from $1000+ headphones: subtle refinement of details, and those last few drops of detail and coherency. A lot of that is stuff that stands out only with a good deal of A-B comparison and practiced critical listening (and then, once you know exactly what to listen for, becomes easier to repeatably confirm).
Point is, Pandas are damn good, and I donāt find Zās assertion that they can play in the same league as $1500 cans to be outrageous. My own gut feel was that sound quality was more in line with $1000 cans than any of the $4-500 headphones Iāve heard, although I admit thereās probably plenty in that range that I havenāt heard. Iād love to do some comparisons with Elegias and Ether CX (and will once my Pandas come in). And keep in mind that wired headphones will need a quality DAC and Amp to drive them; any way you slice it, the value proposition of the Pandas is really pretty amazing.
FWIW, I agree with @Lel that Joshās preview was a nice level-headed analysis of what the Pandas do well. Personally, Iām a little closer to Zās take on imaging, although I only had a pretty limited time with the Pandas and I based my (very favorable) impression largely on one songāāLittle Birdā by Imogen Heapābecause of excellent chorusing and musical separation. I have seen a lot of impressions praising Pandas for their midrange, so perhaps I just stumbled into their sweet spot with that track.
4 Likes
I think the closer competitors would be the elegia and the aeon 2 closed (which is a sizable improvement over the ether line imo). That I would be interested in hearing
1 Like