I was debating between the bf2 and Ares ii for quite sometime. I watched a video where they were compared and that video is what finally convinced me to go with the bf2. According to the comparison, the BF2 struck a really good middle ground between a good delta sigma dac and a good ladder dac. The ares seems great as well, outperforming the BF2 on a soundstage front. But I was worried that the signature would be a little too relaxed for me.
Basically the conclusion was
Good delta sigma dac= best detail retrieval but worst in soundstage.
Ares ii= best in soundstage and “natural” sound but worst in detail retrieval.
BF2= basically in the middle. Still great soundstage and overall natural sound but still retaining and good amount of detail and sparkle in the highs.
For what it’s worth, I love the bf2 and don’t see myself needing another dac in a while. I prefer it being a middle ground because it makes a an easier pairing for other amps and headphones.
Question, any reason why you’re not looking into a tube amp? I guess it’s not the best for gaming exactly, but if you’re really trying to get soundstage and imaging that will help quite a bit.
I’d personally go with the bf2 and still retain more detail overall. It’s easier to add the soundstage with a tube amp and even mellow out the top end with a tube amp or another “more relaxed” solid state. But you wouldn’t be able to add the detail or sparkle that the dac isn’t providing.
That’s just my 2 cents.