While its not a bad headphone its also not completely neutral as the treble is pushed up a little on it. The signature does fit into the competitive gamer category well enough it just lacks in soundstage. It’s by no means bad but I wouldn’t say its the best or at the top of the list.
youd have to compare with 3 headphones…
560s relatively average staging and imaging but a good well rounded reference grade headphone just with tones of brightness in it.
one of the hifimans like the 400se which is getting some popularity. personally haven’t got to this… but headphones like sundara in the higher price brackets are quite nice
the beyers… beyers are known for large soundstage and extremely accurate imaging but they tend to be extremely bright to the point of being unusable for some people
personally itd be for senneheiser the 560s and 660s and for beyer itd be a toss up… 880, 990, or tygr and upgraded would just be 1990 or T1 2nd gen
depends on the player honestly… but for the most part yeah imaging is one of the most important aspects… the sennheisers will work fine with 660s being the better option. Beyers will be built sturdier and have better staging alongside very good imaging in terms of technicalities they tend to be a bit more superior.
never said it couldn’t the problem is tarkov
1990 is quite well known to have a large soundstage accompanied by extremely accurate imaging placements… its designed to tear apart and pick out flaws as an analytical headphone. It does its job extremely well and in gaming theres a reason I give it high praise… its practically a monster and completely overkill for most games. Most games in fps cannot use its entire soundstage though the very accurate imaging is still very nice… of course there is bigger soundstage headphones but the 1990 is plenty big enough for the usual needs… its just not going to be as good as like a sundara or gl2k or something for staging.
would highly recommend getting a regular solid state, tubes warmth isn’t the best choice for competitive. Though as for the little dot, not sure on that one never bothered with those you’d need clarification from others who have sat with it on what it can power. Dacs are technically alright
I chose to stick with my T1 over my 1990 as i preferred its relaxed wider signature over the 1990. The 1990 is very aggressive and in your face with a very bright signature… while the T1 is very bright its much more relaxed so to me its a bit more enjoyable… though 1990 signature is more flexible I also have bigger ears so the curved drivers of the T1 suit me better as my ears don’t lay against the drivers. As far as imaging between the two I would say 1990 edges out in front but T1 has the better staging. The imaging is more marginal and I have very little issues if at all placing sounds on my T1.2. Both can change their signature qutie well its just that 1990 is more neutral and so changing anything with it flips the signature every which way making it have more sound capabilities. T1 though is also a 600 ohm headphone while 1990 is 250 ohm… t1 needs quite a lot of power and is fairly picky when it comes to its amp and dac responding very well to tube amps and higher end amps it scales to a very large degree. Kind of a flip of the coin on which one will prefer however, T1 2nd gen is harder to get now that its been discontinued… used market wise though 1990 and t1 2nd are the same price usually at $400