What are the objective measurements for a DAC?

And that would be me. So if you want to know what demi on fent signed off on is get the copy the sound guy has on his hard drive buy the monitors amp and dac hes got on top of his console. Bam you got “what the artist intended” hard and fast. you want audiophile add an exact replica of the sound guys control room.

Just by being here, you are already far ahead of the average consumer lol, along with some of the gear you own too

If you want what the artist intended, you just have to be the artist lol

3 Likes

We got to take a stand somewhere so im going with the engineers copy hes got squirrled away for better or worse. Im holding on to a fantasy that the sound guys have beautifully mastered copy of our most cherished songs they keep for themselves.

Still say hifi is cheaper than collecting cars. :crazy_face:

1 Like

The artists intents a feel in the lyrics and instruments.
The sound engineer captures that while giving it is own spin.
The mastering engineer makes it sound good in most situations.
And then it ends up on some combination of gear nobody before ever saw comming.

4 Likes

Or go see a live concert. That’s the only real way I know… hey come to think of it, I’ve never heard a live show sound like the recording. Damn this conundrum ASR! lol

My beef isn’t with measurements per se, they at least are consistent, albeit if of questionable value as we know. My problem with the review I read is that he ended the review with I can NOT recommend said piece of equipment because my measurements show noise. Not what the equipment actually sounds like. No opinion given on that and IMO it’s a BS way to recommend equipment. Incidentally, the Topping piece of equipment at 1/4 of the price measured better… as he can clearly point to in the measurements.

The video is worth seeing if you have not seen it… your comment is literally the conclustion.

My idea of enjoying music has always been… well… hi-fi, as in high fidelity, as in, give me all the truth. Don’t add color. Don’t add detail. It’s cheating.

The world I want, a world without shitty microphones, re-amped guitars, and mastering engineers working only to reproduce what happened in the studio to perfection, doesn’t exist… and ASR needs to learn this.

Steve guttenberg says chesky records is what you seek.

1 Like

We’re talking about the artists intent here. Take a watch at this whole interview. I love shit like this. Towards the end Steve Jordan start talking about mastering.

2 Likes

Im 50/50 movies/music. So just couldnt resist.

1 Like

Thanks. I added all this to my Youtube “Watch Later” list and will all give you likes in a few hours because… I did not look at the forum for like two weeks and now I’m out of " :heart: 's ".

1 Like

Who dont like gear porn and you get to see how the sausage is made.

1 Like

Except “audio sausage” won’t make you a vegetarian, lol.

sifting through produce like a pro and audiophiliac channel turned me into a hifi vegan.

1 Like

Interestingly there is transition in recording that mirrors the (hifi) output side going from analog to digital “in the box” mixing/mastering if im understanding what goes into music production.

The more I know, the more I realize most studios and masterings just fuck up the sound (I said most, not all!), and hi-fi is about getting the raw, fucked up sound, and audiophilia is about unfucking-it in a subjective and pleasant way. :stuck_out_tongue:

This is really not poetic, but lol. The raw, “fucked up” sound, can be great (can be positively viewed as audiophilia actually – i.e. food and cuisine is definitely not all sausage), and is, most of the time, impressive to me. And I get everything of the “audiophile” aspect too. Just add the flavor you want. :man_shrugging:

1 Like

Agree. There are some bands that really seem to care about good mixing and mastering. Steely Dan, Amber Rubarth, Massive Attack, Radiohead, etc.

Then there are some that could give two f*cks. I LOVE Oasis, but its third album, “Be Here Now,” has some of the worst mixing and mastering of any rock album I’ve heard. The sound is just awful.

No wonder it’s called the band’s “cocaine album.” I’ve read the band, producer and sound staff all were wired to the gills on blow during recording and mixing/mastering. Hell, the tune “My Big Mouth” has around 25 guitar tracks on it alone.

Noel: “Oy! Can I put 12 more guitar tracks on that song? Sniff-sniff.”
Producer: “Yeah, why not? It will sound brilliant! Sniff-sniff.”

:slight_smile:

3 Likes

think the problem is the genre popular music/rock does not record well in high resolution dynamic range and the other categories suffer from the artist/finance side of production insisting the gains turned way up to play loud through cars bluetooth speakers and cellphones.

So if you want the true uncompressed hi-res dynamic range its going to be classical/jazz none-electric stuff.

I could be talking out my ass.

2 Likes

No, you’re right. I read a FASCINATING story a couple of years ago about how rock and pop are mixed and mastered at much higher decibel levels than in their earlier eras.

I think it’s the “American Idol” theory – louder must mean better. Nearly every damn singer on “Idol” – especially the female ones – could sing from the soles of their feet but had ZERO phrasing or control. But everyone thought they were amazing.

Sadly, Whitney Houston started this trend. She had the rare gift of incredible volume and power AND control. But then her impersonators, namely Mariah Carey, came along and had nothing but decibels and range, with zero phrasing or control.

In contrast, listen to an R&B singer like Anita Baker or Toni Braxton or a jazz singer like Diana Krall or Jane Monheit. They all have gorgeous control and phrasing. Annie Lennox is the rare pop and rock singer who has both, too. Her voice is angelic.

I think music mixing and mastering have mirrored that in the last few decades.

2 Likes

There’s an entire generation (Idol as you put it perhaps?) that’s grown up conflating power with volume, I’d not thought about the phrasing as how you put it, but thinking about it it’s very clear that… is instinctual, you simply can’t teach it. Celia Cruz for example, Ella Fitzgerald, I’d include Amy Winehouse in there simply because she was a soul possessed when she sang.

Thinking through your line of reasoning, another artist that comes to mind that can “phrase” is Florence Welch.

Getting back to the power though, and the conflating of power with volume and that Mariah Carey and Christina Agilera crap where they’re actually yelling more than singing…

Control is subtle, but genuine power isn’t yelling and when you hear any of the female vocalists on the above list, when they project and it’s loud in volume, it’s more importantly controlled and there’s a subtle but very clear difference. Shit Annie Lennox can whisper powerfully.

4 Likes