The US is actually pretty unique in the world in terms of the disenfranchisement of voters convicted of felonies, although it varies from state to state - I’m not sure if I’m the one you were referring to but I think I did share this before which details the different rules each state has about who can vote if they’re a felon and when or if they ever get their votes back. I personally think that anyone who has served their time should be able to get their right to vote back but a lot of people in the US don’t.
Note that normally Donald Trump wouldn’t be able to vote anymore, but Florida’s particular laws state that if your conviction is out of state, they defer to that state’s laws - and in 2021 New York passed a law to allow felons to vote as long as they aren’t incarcerated during the election. Otherwise he would have been disenfranchised too.
But it really is unusual - most other countries don’t disenfranchise you unless it’s an extraordinary circumstance (I.e. if your conviction was specifically related to election fraud, etc). A lot even let you vote while still in prison.
From Human Rights Watch:
“The United States may have the world’s most restrictive criminal disenfranchisement laws. We know of no other democracy besides the United States in which convicted offenders who have served theirsentences are nonetheless disenfranchised for life. A few countries restrict the vote for a short period after conclusion of the prison term: Finland and New Zealand, for example, restrict the vote for several years after completion of sentence, but only in the case of persons convicted of buying or selling votes or of corrupt practices. Some countries condition disenfranchisement of prisoners on the seriousness of the crime or the length of their sentence. Others, e.g., Germany and France, permit disenfranchisement only when it is imposed by a court order.
Many countries permit persons in prison to vote. According to research by Penal Reform International,60 prisoners may vote in countries as diverse as the Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Israel, Japan, Kenya, Netherlands, Norway, Peru, Poland, Romania, Sweden and Zimbabwe. In Germany, the law obliges prison authorities to encourage prisoners to assert their voting rights and to facilitate voting procedures. The only prisoners who may not vote are those convicted of electoral crimes or crimes (e.g., treason) that undermine the “democratic order,” and whose court-imposed sentence expressly includes disenfranchisement“
Also found this interesting. Japan just has a court case about disenfranchising a paroled felon:
In its decision, the Takamatsu District Court said restrictions on voting might be possible if an individual was found guilty of violating election laws, but added that the large majority of convicts committed crimes unrelated to elections.
The Takamatsu election administration commission argued in court that the plaintiff could not be expected to cast a ballot fairly because he had once damaged the legal order.
But the district court described that argument as being nothing but a symbolic impression lacking any specific basis.
Article 11 of the Public Offices Election Law states that individuals who have received finalized sentences that were not suspended and were serving time could neither vote nor run for office.
But the district court said that provision violated Article 15 of the Constitution, which guarantees universal suffrage as well as Article 44, which prohibits discrimination on who can vote.
At a news conference in Tokyo on March 31, Yagihashi said, “It was an extremely proper ruling that will serve as a first step in eliminating groundless bias.”
His lawyer, Kyoko Yoshida, said, “(The ruling said) prisoners are also sovereign members who should be allowed to cast a ballot in elections. The ruling holds the possibility of correcting prejudice against convicts.”
In a 2005 Supreme Court ruling, voting restrictions were only allowed in exceptional cases in which a fair election could not be ensured.
Subsequent court rulings determined various voting restrictions as unconstitutional, such as the voting system for Japanese nationals living abroad and against adults who rely on a guardian.