Binary Acoustics EP321

Binary Acoustics:

:musical_notes: An IEM brand since 2017, already carving its identity.

  • Gizaudio x Binary Chopin — our collaboration four‑driver hybrid, released October 2023.

  • Dynaquattro—July 2024, a bold step into quad‑driver refinement.

  • EP321 — coming December 2025, after a long gap, the next chapter awaits.

:scroll: What we know so far: The EP321 marks a return with fresh engineering after a deliberate pause.

Part 1: Product Specifications

Brand: Binary
Model: EP321 MEMS
Configuration:
1 Dynamic Driver + 1 Passive Diaphragm + 3 Balanced Armature Drivers + 1 MEMS (10 mm Low-Frequency DD + 6 mm Passive Diaphragm + 3 BA + MEMS)
Termination Plugs: 3.5mm、4.4mm
Package Content:
One pair of EP321-MEMS IEMs
High-Purity Stock cable with 0.78mm 2-Pin Connectors
Carry Case
Two Sets of Ear Tips
User Manual

Sensitivity:122dB/Vrms @ 1kHz
Impedance:13Ω @ 1kHz
Frequency Response Range :8-40kHz(¼ Inch Free-Field,-3Db)
THD:<1%@1kHz
Housing: 3D Printed Resin Housing with CNC-Machined Stainless Steel Face Covers

Part 2: Product Highlights (The Pitch)

  1. Advanced Three-Types of Driver Configuration:
    For a powerful, natural, and lifelike sound profile, the EP321 features a single dynamic driver, a passive diaphragm, three balanced-armature drivers, and a direct-drive MEMS unit. The output “circuit” uses a physical three-way crossover frame. This further optimizes each frequency band, giving the EP321 an excellent dynamic range, rich high-frequency details, transparent mid-range, and an overall powerful, full, and natural sound.

  2. The World’s First Direct Drive MEMS Unit
    High-Resolution, High-Response, High-Scalability
    Typically, MEMS devices require a dedicated amplifier to provide bias voltage for proper operation.
    The Binary EP321 introduces a brand-new direct-drive MEMS unit, eliminating the need for an external amplifier and allowing direct driving from conventional playback devices. Furthermore, because the MEMS unit features an extremely rigid, thin, and lightweight semiconductor diaphragm, the EP321 boasts exceptionally high high-frequency resolution and response speed, along with superior extendability.

  3. Closely reproduces a Pure High-Fidelity Sound; Strong Details, Rich Tone
    Rich and Detailed presentation
    The EP321 uses a composite high-frequency BA Driver unit, which, in conjunction with MEMS, produces a clearer sound with superior resolution. It can reproduce the tonal characteristics of instruments in music very well, and can also separate multiple instruments to maintain the overall balance, allowing listeners to experience rich details.

  4. Precise Imaging and Accurate Vocals
    Restores Natural and Lifelike Vocals
    The EP321 uses a full-range balanced armature driver for midrange output, which has excellent cohesion to cover the midrange. It can highly reproduce the vocal characteristics of different singers and present the emotions of vocal music clearly.

  5. Active+Passive Composite Bass Module
    Dynamic, Powerful, Deep-Diving Bass Response
    The EP321 bass section utilizes the same 10mm dynamic driver and 6mm wool paper cone passive diaphragm as the highly-acclaimed DynaQuattro. This active+passive composite low-frequency module with internal and external dual magnetic circuit structure produces a solid lower-end response. It is not easy to cause listening fatigue even after long-term listening.

1 Like

Well, nobody can accuse Binary of flooding the zone like Ziigaat or Kiwi Ears, both of which seemingly puke about two new models per month into the market!

Very curious about this MEMS technology.

4 Likes

We know that MEMS alone cannot give off an ideal natural sonic character up top.

Binary, by hindsight, coupled its MEMS speakers with another BA receiver most probably to handle the air and extension aspects of the sound output…

image courtesy of the Binary FB page

1 Like

https://xmems.com/press-release/xmems-introduces-lassen-its-first-amplifier-less-high-performance-mems-tweeter/#:~:text=Manufacturers%20such%20as%20Creative%20Labs,production%20scheduled%20for%20September%202025.

Binary EP321 — Initial Impressions :headphone:

From the very first listen, the EP321 presents itself with a bright yet controlled top end.

  • Treble: airy, extended, detailed — never harsh, always breathing space into the mix.

  • Midrange: engaging, lively, neutral, and open. Vocals sit naturally, with separation that shines especially in the mids.

  • Bass: sub‑bass focused, with commendable detail, decay, extension, rumble, and texture.

:bar_chart: Tuning: In line with the graph, the EP321 leans into a W‑shaped signature, paired with a higher‑than‑usual headstage. Vocals are projected slightly away from the listener, enhancing spatial realism.

:milky_way: Soundstage: significantly wide with convincing depth, creating an immersive listening field. This set can and will holograph given the right source.

Long Session Playback :musical_notes:

By the 6th hour of continuous playback, Badman’s Song - TFF revealed the EP321’s agility:

  • Confidence: the set performs with maturity, keeping pace effortlessly.

  • Coherence: for a multi‑driver/speaker set, performance is in great unison — nothing feels detached.

  • Detail retrieval: both low‑level nuances and macro dynamics are presented without strain.

  • Listening comfort: ears adapt easily, with no fatigue despite extended sessions.

  • Piano: fluid, engaging, lively.

  • Percussions: carry the wow factor, with kick drums rendered with striking realism.

  • Bass lines: large‑scale, authoritative, yet never intrusive.

  • Voices: female, male, and choral — immaculate, with a high sense of projection.

  • Overall: Badman’s Song takes on a live‑performance vibe, confidently bridging studio precision with concert energy.

3 Likes

The scale on that graph has to be wrong. 30db im the bass and 25db pinna? :scream: I don’t think so.

2 Likes

Enjoyed this review by Andy

Yeah, they thought the Background is looking good “Let’s use it“. LOL

The Seeds Of Love is one of my favorite test albums! Badman’s Song is a great choice for all of the little cues and dynamics!

2 Likes

Enjoy the weekend, everyone.

Binary EP321 MEMS — Elevated Acoustics, Accessible Excellence

Premium performance, community‑friendly cost of entry

Pros & Cons

Pros

Complete set: even the ear tips are keepers.

Excellent value proposition: strong performance for the money.

Design: lovely clear shells paired with fantastic metal faceplates.

Detailheads unite! Exceptional resolution across the range.

Trebleheads unite! MEMS drivers deliver sparkling clarity.

Bass resolution: bloat‑free, accurate, and textured.

Immersive experience: wide W‑shaped sound signature designed for long listening sessions.

Comfort: easy on the ears, lightweight shells optimized for extended wear.

Midrange & treble resolution: excellent for the price tier.

Natural timbre: lifelike tonal qualities across instruments and vocals.

Soundstage: expansive, out‑of‑head staging with convincing depth and height.

Coherence: impressive for a tribrid design, maintaining unison across drivers.

Detail retrieval & technicalities: strong micro and macro performance.

3D effects: holographic imaging enhances realism.

Efficiency: moderately efficient — a dongle is enough to portray musician‑style staging.

Cons

Not for bassheads: sub‑bass focused neutrality may feel restrained.

Not for treble sensitive listeners: bright but controlled treble can still be too much for some.

Source dependence: requires a better‑than‑average source player to unlock full potential.

Album quality dependence: poor recordings will sound poor — transparency cuts both ways.

Introduction

The greatest challenge in any endeavour is not to create the ultimate when resources are limitless — an open world of everything, including cost, makes that path almost too easy.

The genuine test lies in crafting excellence within constraints. To achieve balance, precision, and artistry when boundaries are real — that is where true innovation emerges.

In my world outside this hobby, we call it value engineering: the discipline of extracting maximum performance, clarity, and purpose.

The Binary EP321 embodies this principle, translating it into an absolute high quality, high performance of sound.

Specifications

Name: EP321-MEMS

Impedance: 13Ω @1kHz(±15%)

Sensitivity: 122dB/Vrms @ 1kHZ

Effective frequency response: 20-20kHz (IEC60318-4)

Frequency range: 8-40KHz

Speaker Configuration: Six-Driver Tribrid Setup with an electronic crossover each side

Drivers/receivers: 10mm silicone suspension dynamic driver and 6mm passive diaphragm, 3 balanced armature units and a directly driven MEMS micro speaker unit

Cable: Oxygen free copper, silver plated; No microphonics, soft

Packaging

The Binary EP321 MEMS arrives in an Armani Exchange‑inspired glossy black box, setting the tone with mystery and refinement. The presentation is carefully laid out:

Faceplates are protected by laminated clear soft plastics, ensuring they remain pristine out of the box.

A dedicated compartment houses the 2 sets of ear tips coming in size S,M,L, with their own frosted transparent case.

The cable is Velcro‑tied for tidiness, avoiding tangles and reinforcing attention to detail.

Beneath the foam compartment for the IEMs lies a generously sized carrying case, offering ample space for storage and travel.

Overall, the layout feels generous and stress‑free, with no signs of compromise. The unboxing experience reflects Binary Acoustics’ intent: premium presentation that matches the elevated performance inside.

Quality

The EP321’s build reflects Binary Acoustics’ commitment to precision and artistry.

3D‑Printed Shells: Designed in collaboration with HeyGears, the shells are produced using highly precise 3D printing technology with a pre‑calculated frequency division structure. Lightweight yet robust, the transparent interiors remain visually captivating — a design that never gets old to admire.

Faceplates: The stainless‑steel faceplates employ high‑precision photolithography reflective grating technology, creating a dazzling, colour‑shifting effect under different lighting conditions. This adds a premium aesthetic without compromising ergonomics.

Weight & Comfort: Despite the use of stainless steel, each unit weighs only about 7.5g per side. The profile sits comfortably in the concha, allowing hours of fatigue‑free wear. Extended workday testing confirms the shells remain secure and comfortable throughout.

Overall Impression: The combination of advanced 3D printing, reflective grating faceplates, and ergonomic design makes the EP321 both visually striking and practically effortless to use. It balances engineering precision, sophistication with everyday comfort.

Detailed Sound Impressions :headphone:

Bass; The EP321 MEMS presents a sub‑bass focused response within a neutral tone, striking a balance between accuracy and musicality.

Control & Detail: Notes are delivered with precision, showcasing excellent control, texture, and decay. Extension is decent, ensuring the low end feels complete without exaggeration.

Visceral Impact: Despite its neutral nature, the bass can be throbbing and visceral when called upon. Listening to “Under the Influence” by The Chemical Brothers highlights this quality — the EP321 defines visceral bass through natural weight and authority.

Foundation of the Track: The bass response feels organic, serving as the ideal foundation for complex arrangements. It supports rather than overwhelms, allowing mids and treble to breathe while still anchoring the music with authority.

The EP321’s bass is disciplined yet engaging — textured, accurate, and capable of visceral impact when the track demands it. It avoids bloat, instead offering a natural foundation that enhances the overall coherence of the presentation.

Auditioning the EP321 MEMS after an hour and returning to the same track confirms its natural timbre in the bass region. This design clearly favours long listening sessions, where the bass remains authoritative yet fatigue‑free.

Mids; The EP321 MEMS midrange is its sonic playground, where neutrality meets richness.

Neutral Character: Like the bass, the mids carry a neutral tonality — but not in the sense of being thin or sterile. Instead, they present a neutral high definition that feels natural and balanced.

Detail Retrieval: The midrange is rich in both low‑level microdetails and macro dynamics, ensuring subtle textures and larger musical swings are equally well represented.

Vocal Projection: Male and female vocals alike are projected with confidence and clarity. The EP321 captures timbre faithfully, giving voices a lifelike presence without artificial warmth or coloration.

Engagement: The mids remain lively and open, supporting instruments and vocals with coherence. They avoid congestion, allowing the listener to appreciate separation while still feeling the performance as a unified whole.

The EP321’s midrange is where its musicality and discipline converge, offering a presentation that is both engaging and orderly.

Vocal Projection: On “Sinnerman” by Nina Simone, the High Priestess of Soul, the EP321 captures her vocal range with absolute clarity. The performance projects powerfully yet naturally, with the added bonus of revealing microphone capture nuances that bring the studio atmosphere to life.

Engagement & Order: Despite the highly engaging nature of the track, the EP321 maintains structure. Instruments and vocals are presented with separation and balance, ensuring the energy never tips into chaos.

Instrumental Detail: The piano is rendered with remarkable precision — from the plucking of keys to the subtle pedal indentations, every nuance is faithfully reproduced. This level of detail enhances realism and immerses the listener in the performance.

Timbre & Coherence: The midrange remains neutral in tone, rich in both micro and macro detail. Vocals and instruments sound lifelike, with timbre that supports long listening sessions without fatigue.

The EP321’s midrange is neutral yet richly detailed, projecting vocals with clarity and instruments with realism. It balances engagement with discipline, making complex performances like Nina Simone’s Sinnerman both emotionally powerful and technically ordered.

Upper Midrange; The EP321 MEMS demonstrates its high‑quality, high‑performance nature most vividly in the upper midrange.

Instrumental Coherence: Violins are rendered with remarkable clarity and natural timbre, seamlessly blending with piano and upright bass. The EP321 maintains coherence across instruments, ensuring no single element dominates the mix.

Classical Performance: On Beethoven for Three: Symphony No. 6 in F Major, Op. 68 “Pastorale” featuring Emanuel Ax, Leonidas Kavakos, and Yo‑Yo Ma, the EP321 captures the collaboration with unison. Each instrument is distinct yet harmonized, reflecting the ensemble’s synergy.

Detail & Texture: The upper midrange reveals fine textures — bowing on strings, resonance of piano keys, and the body of the upright bass — all delivered with precision and balance.

Engagement: The presentation is highly engaging without becoming forward or fatiguing. The EP321’s tuning ensures the upper mids remain musical, supporting long listening sessions with ease.

The EP321’s upper midrange excels in clarity, coherence, and natural timbre, making classical ensembles a joy to experience. Violins, piano, and upright bass are faithfully reproduced, with unison and order that highlight the artistry of collaboration.

Treble; is the raison d’être of the EP321 MEMS — its defining strength and signature.

Living HD Colour: Presented in full living high‑definition colour, the treble offers sparkling clarity with a realism that approaches home hi‑fi class.

Neutral Yet High Definition: The tuning remains neutral, but not thin. Instead, it embodies high definition neutrality, where detail and extension are delivered without harshness.

Hypnotic Presentation: From the opening notes through to the closing of “Do It Again” by Steely Dan, the treble is nothing short of hypnotic. It draws the listener in with effortless brilliance.

Air & Extension: The EP321 excels in treble air, clarity, and decay. Extension is sublime, giving cymbals, strings, and upper harmonics a natural shimmer that enhances the sense of space.

Realism & Control: Despite its sparkle, the treble remains controlled, avoiding sibilance or fatigue. It balances technical precision with musical engagement.

Technicalities

The EP321 MEMS delivers technical performance that feels far beyond its price tier, approaching the scale and realism of full‑size headphones.

ADSR / PRaT: On “Take Five” by The Dave Brubeck Quartet, attack, decay, sustain, and release are spot on. Pace, rhythm, and timing are natural and precise, keeping the performance lively and coherent.

Stage Depth & Reflection: Percussion reflections against studio walls are rendered with exceptional depth, creating a convincing sense of space.

Stage Height & Width: Height extends above the head, while left‑right width approaches shoulder edges. The result is an expansive, immersive stage that feels larger than expected for an IEM.

Imaging Scale: Imaging carries a scale akin to full‑size headphones, with instruments placed convincingly in three‑dimensional space.

Dynamics: Both low‑level microdetails and macro swings are handled with finesse. Dynamic contrast is aces, ensuring quiet passages and explosive peaks are equally well represented.

Timbral Qualities: The timbre is hi‑fi in nature, with a high degree of realism across instruments and vocals.

Holographic Imaging: Imaging is absolutely clear as day, with holographic precision that enhances immersion and realism.

The EP321’s technicalities are exceptional for its tier — precise ADSR, expansive staging, dynamic contrast, hi‑fi timbre, and holographic imaging combine to deliver a presentation that feels far larger than its form factor.

Select Comparison

Detail Heads / Treble Heads Fight!!

Versus the iBasso IT07 ($900) Configuration: 1 × Tesla Dynamic Driver + 6 × Knowles Balanced Armature drivers per side, silver nozzle filter used.

Bass: Both sets present neutral bass. Detail retrieval is on par, though the EP321 bears more weight and offers a larger scale.

Midrange: The IT07 leans further into neutrality, while the EP321 carries a touch of warmth. Separation is a toss‑up — the EP321’s Siamese twin BA receiver shows its high‑performance traits despite the different tuning approach.

Treble: The IT07 is expertly tuned, with fantastic resolving power and some of the best treble parameters for the money. It is the brighter set, whereas the EP321 offers a bright but controlled attitude, balancing sparkle with restraint.

Technicalities: Sound field depth favours the former iBasso flagship, though the EP321 is not far behind. Width is more or less equal, while stage height goes to the EP321.

Detail Retrieval: The IT07’s brighter tuning gives the impression of an upper hand in microdetail, though margins are small.

3D Effects: A tie — both sets deliver convincing spatial cues.

Summary

The EP321 overall is the more natural‑sounding set, despite bearing bright properties. The IT07, by contrast, leans toward the analytical side, with razor‑sharp treble resolution and depth. Both cater to detail and treble enthusiasts, but the EP321 tempers brightness with musicality, while the IT07 pursues precision with neutrality.

Final Words

The Binary EP321 MEMS is more than just another entry in the mid‑tier IEM market — it feels like a statement piece. From its Armani Exchange‑inspired packaging to its HeyGears‑engineered shells and dazzling photolithography faceplates, the presentation sets the tone for what lies inside: a performance that blends technical precision with musical engagement.

Across the frequency range, the EP321 demonstrates discipline and coherence. Sub‑bass is textured and visceral without bloat, mids are neutral yet richly detailed, upper mids deliver lifelike timbre and instrumental unison, and treble is hypnotic — airy, sparkling, and fatigue‑free.

Technicalities seal the deal: expansive staging, holographic imaging, hi‑fi timbre, and dynamic contrast that rival full‑size headphones.

Comparisons with respected upper class like the iBasso IT07 show the EP321’s character clearly. The EP321 refines neutrality into something more musical and spacious. Against the IT07, the EP321 tempers brightness with natural realism, offering a sound that feels less clinical and more immersive.

Verdict

The EP321 MEMS is a gateway to high‑end technicalities at a competitive price point. It respects neutrality but adds scale, air, and musicality, making it equally suited for detail heads and long‑session listeners. Binary Acoustics has delivered a set that doesn’t just perform — it defines its own identity in a crowded field.

Should we value clarity, coherence, and fatigue‑free brilliance, the Binary EP321 MEMS deserves a place on anyone’s shortlist.

1 Like

Thanks for sharing, Ben Dennis. It would be nice to hear a bit more of your personal voice come through. Everything seems exadurated and statements like…

and…

… just scream ChatGPT. “It not only does A – it [explitive] Bs” :yawning_face:

Like @SuperJunee I think you should be transparent about your affiliations. Being the fan of a particular brand is one thing, but ONLY engaging with stuff from HifiGo makes you pretty untrustworthy. It quicky goes from fan to simp. You joined in May and have only posted about HifiGo products, just like @SuperJunee was doing. Just look at your history here Profile - TheEdge - HifiGuides Forums

We’ve seen this before @Ohmboy . Gets pretty damn tiring. :expressionless_face:

10 Likes

My set should be arriving sometime this week. Having IEMs of nearly all different driver types on-hand (which I find somewhat moot b/c I put way more stock into proper tuning), I can definitely entertain the driver type/“technicalities” inquiries when I get some initial impressions in. Not expecting miracles, but the direct drive MEMS piqued my interest enough to order them.

2 Likes

Not to mention that is a wall of text that’s damn near impossible to read whilst keeping any sort of attention.

I’m now a firm believer that a longer review doesn’t translate to better. Skip the Chat GPT prompt. Mention some music. Be honest of your affiliation and move on.

8 Likes

giphy

1 Like

Binary Acoustics EP321 Shootout:

The IEMs:

  • Binary Acoustics EP321 ($309.99 USD)
  • Softears Volume S ($319.00 USD)
  • Punch Audio Martilo ($329.00 USD)
  • XENNS Mangird Tea PRO ($359.00 USD)
  • XENNS Mangird Top PRO ($499.00 USD)
  • GoldPlanar GL-AMT16 ($1499.00 USD) w/ Mesh Filter

The Rippingtons - Snowbound
(Contemporary Jazz Group)

Binary Acoustics EP321
There’s quite a bit of tactility and presence, but at the cost of being somewhat grating (foam tips help tame a bit of this.) The stage feels enveloping, but not very large, and it doesn’t have that black of a background either. Upper frequency elements just pop out of the mix quite viscerally with exceptional detail, albeit with a mild metallic sheen. Bass performance is weak, elastic-sounding especially for kick drums. Does not with scale with volume very well.

Softears Volume S
Treble is more restrained here, with a calmer overall presentation. The “blackground” is on part with the EP321. Percussion has a bit more weight behind it, but separation suffers, with less contrast and perceived resolution, overall.

Punch Audio Martilo
Bass is weighty and authoritative as its reputation holds, but it’s a bit more laid back of a listen for the upper-half of the frequency response. Separation is an improvement over the Volume S, and even with the subdued treble, it remains detailed enough to avoid sounding dull.

XENNS Mangird Tea Pro
A smoother, easier listen. Treble doesn’t come of as refined as the others, and the bass is less impactful than both the Volume S and Martilo, landing closer to the EP321 in quantity.

XENNS Mangird Top Pro
An appreciable step up from the Tea Pro (within the family). Easier to follow the instrument lines than the other sets, and I prefer it over the EP321 for its control, even though it’s not as detailed for certain elements.

GoldPlanar GL-AMT16
Other than being a bit “bass-lite”, this is not really much of a contest. I bring this set up because the treble (not overall separation) trades blows with the EP321, but in all other respects, it get smoked.

Ranking: GL-AMT16 > Top Pro > Martilo = EP321 ≥ Volume S > Tea Pro


säje - Wisteria
(Vocal Quartet)

Binary Acoustics EP321
Vocals sound compressed and uneven, with fricatives drawing a little too much attention. Harmonies are reproduced somewhat cleanly, but lacking. Mids are middling.

Softears Volume S
Vocals have more upfront presence, and the bass is weightier; however, separation between voices isn’t as strong, creating a bit of a dense presentation compared to the EP321.

Punch Audio Martilo
This isn’t a vocal set, but it’s more listenable than the EP321.

Xenns Mangird Tea Pro v. Top Pro
Something about the vocal harmonies, and the generally relaxed signature of the Tea Pro, really lends itself here. I actually prefer this over the Top Pro, at least for this sort of playback.

GoldPlanar GL-AMT16
This track really doesn’t benefit from such an elevated treble response as the EP321’s is. No contest amongst the rest of these.

Ranking: GL-AMT16 > Tea Pro > Top Pro > Martilo > EP321 = Volume S


Yosi Horikawa - Crossing
(Electronic/Field-Recordings)

Binary EP321 v. GL-AMT16
The soundstage is more intimate but still quite even (height and depth-wise) for this recording. The EP321 is more up front with better transients… in isolation… but as the track get busier, I just find the GL-AMT16 a better listen, overall.

Softears Volume S
Not as detail-forward, but a slight improvement in bass weight to the EP321.

Xenns Mangird Tea Pro v. Xenns Mangird Top Pro v. Punch Audio Martilo
The richer sound of the Tea Pro doesn’t lend itself to this track, whereas the Top Pro is decently separated with clean attack for the bass notes. The Martilo, on the other hand, is stronger in the bass than both, but still cleanly separated, just not at the level of the Top Pro.

Ranking: GL-AMT16 > Binary EP321 > Top Pro > Martilo > Volume S = Tea Pro


Verdict/TL;DR:

I think the Binary Acoustics EP321 still falls into the specialist category amongst the MEMs implementations, and just like the Aurvana Ace 2, an IEM with MEMs drivers will only go as far as the rest of its configuration takes it.

Do you like ASMR? Do you want to hear kilobuck-level treble? Absolutely get this, this is the best IEM I’ve heard at this price level for genres that token the upper frequency ranges. The rest of the drivers don’t impede on that aspect, but they’re not the best-in-price either.

4 Likes

I went for a really deep dive on this one . Loved It but it needs abit of time to dial it in and a deep eartips insertion.

Thank you HiFiGo and Binary Acoustics for the sample for the Canuck Audioholics Anonymous (CAA)

1 Like

Do you only recommend if one can tolerate deep insertion? I"m MEMs curious :wink: but don’t care for deep insertion.

1 Like

A shallow insertion will give you less bass more MEMS that’s for sure :grin: