Byerdynamic DT 177X vs 1990?

Headphones Headphone Discussion / Help
1

I know the DT 177X is smooth and less bright than the 1990 but is there an improvement over the 32ohm 177X?

2

The 1990 is more detailed and neutral responding, and also has better imaging and soundstage imo. I would say if you already have a 177x and want a better sound I don’t know if the 1990 would be worthwhile, but if you are looking between them and don’t need closed back, I personally prefer the 1990

4 Likes
3

Thanks I just ordered the 1990!

4

Nice, hope you enjoy it :+1:

1 Like
5

After much soul searching, I just ordered the DT177X’s. I really needed a closed back for work, as my co-workers were probably tired of listening to my HD6XX’s and K7XX’s with me. I love my TR-X00’s, but their isolation is only so,so and I don’t want to go deaf trying to drown out the sound of my co-worker’s phone call. I would love a pair of DT 1990’s, but I don’t need/can’t afford another pair of open backs right now.

Short story: closed vs. open.

2 Likes
6

I was going to get 177X because of the closed back too but after a bit of research I think the DT1990 is a good overall headphone so and its only $60 more on so I went for it.

7

I think the 1990’s are probably a better headphone InfiniteKun, but my office is really quiet and people stare at me when I use open backs. :grin:

8

Yeah, open backs are not recommended in an office area unless you like making enemies lol (if they leak alot)

9

Stupid-ass question maybe but, I guess the Focal Elegias beat the 177Xs in every way?

10

It’s more preference tbh. I would personally prefer the elegia, but the 177x might have a more enjoyable tuning to some people

3 Likes
11

Elegia probably got way more detail though?

12

I would say it has more detail lol

1 Like
13

Thanks again :smiley: