Well, they have an offline program to test. You have to get to level 8 on all the tests to pass.
It was not easy for me, since I was stuck at Level 7s for a long long time.
Well, they have an offline program to test. You have to get to level 8 on all the tests to pass.
It was not easy for me, since I was stuck at Level 7s for a long long time.
I went to Harmanâs website. I could not find their listening program as available. Do you have a link to the Harman-trained listening program? Thanks
I have to find. Itâs been two years, might have to dig deep.
Thank you for taking the time
Canât find the Software, I will upload it in Cloud and give you a link in the future.
Thanks. I am using a Mac. Is the software Windows-only?
its here
Program downloaded. Thanks!
@Argha @HTT
I did it, all 8 and two nines i feel like if i sit for longer i can easily score higher but after 3.5 hours im losing my mind already. this program proved i kinda suck at identifying dips, thats why i had a hard time finding out the 3k recession of my oracles.
Damn, you got a really nice hearing.
no, my hearing isnât nice, i just had a general idea of what boosting or reducing different frequencies do and as you can see i failed alot too, so my hearing is faaaar from being even decent.
Wow near my target different bass shelf preference .
Yeah not easy ,maybe everyone will find with this graphic eq target .Company create iem not thigh and perfect target .So my question why everyone seem use my dna graphic eq target ?? 250 khz -2db ,and 4khz - up to 5 db depend on environment .So I still research this curve until now ,I found
whats that iem? open up the iem in squig and manually put the eq numbers you made and see what the end fr looks like. you boosted 2k that would result in a thin and slightly shouty tonality imo get more bands on the eq and rise the 3k while keeping 1to 3k in check.
today i had alot of free time at home so decided to make a final eq setting here for oracles that i rarely used by now but finally they will get daily and heavy usage from now on because they sound magical now, and i can see why single dds are not enough for upper regions, they just have slightly less res due to the treble incompetencies and getting the midrange right is harder on them but still doable. if you have any hybrid with good treble extension on hand( like em6l that is 100$) give this kind of graph a try. i reduced the 8k because couplers usually add a few db there so irl when equing based on 711 measurements i always reduce 8k by a few dbs .
next to some well tuned iems, i find the eq version much more accurate than all these iems except one that is very close.
some notes on the eq
if you want eq presets with harman midrange with your prefrence bass/treble just dm me, ill send you for free because i feel like everybody needs to experience this beauty im hearing.
Should I invite Sean Olive to this Thread?
getting the midrange done right is done for me( 80% of the problem solved), but another massive mystery remains is the bass. i need to ask him about the the bass boost in in ears and why after the midrange correction i need more bass to match my speakers sense of punch and weight and why flat bass is wrong.
do you know why its the case?
Speakers sound hits your entire body and they have huge drivers. To compensate for that you need more bass quantity from the iem instead to match the perceived bass from the speakers.
@Rikudou_Goku, many people, including audio professionals, completely underestimate the input from mechanoreceptors for the enjoyment of music, notably in the bass. The scientific evidence is there but more than a few mixers/engineers are still caught in the mixing for the 8-track tapes generation. I think also, because some audio engineers forget that there is a person/consumer at the receiving end of sound output that has expectaions/wants/needs.
https://remix.berklee.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1005&context=mh-exchange-music-medicine
https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2019-66260-001
Here is a summary, Grok-assisted compilation:
Meissnerâs Corpuscles: These are the most common mechanoreceptors in the glabrous skin (smooth, hairless skin like the fingertips). They respond to touch and low-frequency vibration, with a frequency range of about 10-50 Hz.
Pacinian Corpuscles: These are large encapsulated endings located in the subcutaneous tissue (and more deeply in interosseous membranes and mesenteries of the gut). They are particularly efficient in transducing information about relatively low-frequency vibrations, with a frequency range of about 20-300 Hz.
Merkelâs Disks: These are located in the epidermis and are particularly dense in the fingertips, lips, and external genitalia. They are involved in the static discrimination of shapes, edges, and rough textures, with a frequency range of about 0-10 Hz.
Ruffiniâs Corpuscles: These are slow-adapting, encapsulated mechanoreceptors deep in the skin, ligaments, and tendons. They respond to cutaneous stretching produced by digit or limb movements, with a frequency range of about 0-10 Hz.
My sub drivers are tiny(5 inches), and produce frs from 35hz+ so they donât shake my body they just create a sense of punch and physicality in the air. its sad because i canât buy a sub and boosting bass in my in ears always makes me want to buy a sub because i had a 10 inch sub with my older surround system that i donât use anymore due to neighbors crying about calling the police because it would rumble up their house and objects( canât blame them).