Anyone have any vocal music that has piercing sibilants when listened to with a treble-spiking headphone? Please share. Thanks!
She goes up 1 octave @ 4:00ā¦
Someone saw her live and the sound guy didnāt do his job, so it was unbearable, lol.
Otherwise, that should do it.
Listened to this album recently, way too much highs, no bass at all, ear-shattering-pickaxe-cymbals. Like, the entire album is ā/ā shaped.
Edit: I donāt know if the real CD is like that. I hope not, because Iām buying it ASAP.
Well, there you go, holy shit!
Wow ā thanks everyone! One could easily imagine a house of sonic horrors. Iāll contribute one of my own that I found casually researching this topic:
It also shows why examples of troublesome sibilance may be hard to find in commercially recorded audio.
That was amazing thereās a massive difference between piercing highs and sibilance.
LOL
I own and love the DT 1990. Iām old enough to have my own built-in treble excess filter, but Iāve also had a few pairs of young ears listen to them. They canāt find a treble issue, either. In my working life I did a fair amount of technical writing. Not only do I enjoy writing, I find I always learn something by forcing myself to rigorously organize my thoughts. So purely for my own amusement and interest (and to keep from going insane a few days ago when my internet when) I started writing a review of the 1990.
The more I dig into the polarization between those who get ear-stab-itis from the 1990s and those who donāt, the more Iām perplexed. In what recordings are people encountering 7-9 KHz energy? Itās often referred to as a sibilance issue, but apparently sibilance is routinely āde-essedā from commercial recordings. Few recordings even contain frequencies in this range. Few (acoustic) instruments produce any meaningful amount of overtone energy up there.
So, if itās not vocal and not acoustic instruments, then maybe itās an electronica thing? Bingo. Just tested the first several songs on a Spotify EDM playlist. Plenty of frequency from 6 KHz on out. Clearly, itās designed to literally be edgy. So, if you have an ear canal resonance up there and you have a treble-emphasis headphoneā¦
The sibilance designation seems to be a false lead. But are there any other genres that employ lots of electronically created sounds? If you can think of any please reply. Iām totally ignorant of non-acoustic music.
IAC ā blessings once again for the saintly open-sourcerers that created Audacity. Iām continually amazed how often it comes in handy.
Long story short, thatās literally a +10dB bump to overcompensate for the fact that they canāt make headphones with decent +10khz highs. Theyāre like beats, for people who like treble. Tracks are āde-essedā because itās unwanted by many. Most Beyerdynamics are āessersā, so donāt be surprised many people donāt like them.
Thereās pop music with a lot of synth sounds, every rock/metal/whatever band with a keyboardist, violins⦠and now I realize youāre basically asking me the list of instruments not ācompatibleā with Beyerdynamics. So, huh, yeah, music itself is never the problem.
Pretty much any asian female vocals have sibilance problems.