I live in tropical weather and humidity level is freaking high all the time, but never encountered such problem with any sets while using outside or inside. Even sometimes, I do jogging with them.
We are not talking about right or wrong, or needing that much bass boost and then choosing another set that has more bass from stock.
My point is, some drivers cannot handle lots of EQ and the 770 Pro is one of them, most planars can handle a +15 boost and you will maybe notice some loss in quality and that is it. If you apply a +15 boost in a 770 Pro the result is pure distortion, it is unaudible.
Btw, i hope you guys understand that this +30dB curve was a joke, lol
+1 Or even a little!
Anyone know how or where I can compare the mangird tea graph with the blessing 2 Dusk and starfield (because I’m the most familiar with these)? Was interested in getting the tea and the graph may help me figure out if I want to try them
Another one for ya https://crinacle.com/graphs/iems/graphtool/?share=IEF_Neutral_Target
Edit: Do note it only supports 2 IEMs on a graph, meaning you can only compare 2 IEMs on a graph at once unless you pay for the subscription
This is why I only look for his graph on specific IEMs
Whats your library like, so we can guide you better? Teas graph might be deceiving.
Very diverse. Mostly hip hop, pop, rap, indie, some rock, alternative, punk and metal as well. Out of all my iems (isn h40, penon orb, blon 03, kbear believe, bgvp dmg, momentum in ear, etc) I enjoy the starfields most for these genres. @nymz
To that genres, I’d pick Teas over Dusk (I own Variations which is Dusk with some steroids).
- Both Dusk and Teas will have more sub-bass focus than SF.
- Teas will have better and more present mids than Dusk. Dusk will have more treble quantity and quality. Teas are more relaxed due to that, Dusk might get more fatiguing over some hours, but as always, YMMV.
- Teas are more balanced, Dusk will sound sub-bass monitor like.
- Dusk are slight closer to SF presentation than Teas, but will have worse timbre.
- If timbre is a must, you can also check a single DD for a “direct” upgrade to SF, as Tanchjim Oxygen. That might be one of the reasons you’re loving SF as much. Here’s the graph:
In fact, I’ll double down on my previous post. Look at Oxygen over Teas, since you clearly life SF
Tea>O2>SF . I think O2 will sound a little sharp and screaming in the middle. Tea has a much better soundstage and tonality than the other two.
Tonality will depend on preference, and since he loves SF, O2 will be the clear 1 to 1 upgrade, imo. If I like Teas presentation more? Ofc, it’s my favourite set
Yes. Probably O2 for him. But Tea is better for me. I still haven’t listened to a better 3D scene.
One thing is for sure, Teas won’t beat Oxygen or SF (single DDs) in timbre acurracy, even tho Teas timbre is very good imo for an hibrid.
Stuff like eletric guitar and violins sound great to me on Teas.
The guitars are very good on Tea, as well as the dynamics in the middle. Everyone talks about the dynamics of the bass, but forgets the environment where the guitars are.
Nah, fuck bass, Teas are gorgeous to me because of them MIDS.
I’m a mids guy. I love bass, but if a set can’t reproduce good vocals, I’m out.
Yes. Vocals and middle are a problem for most, for example B2, Variations …