6+ cores is quickly becoming the minimum for AAA titles. Not necessarily on spec sheets but for a good experience. More and more games are utilizing more cores because consumer CPUs have more cores now than in the last 10 years…(thanks Intel for stagnating the market for so long…)
absolutely. i did the exact same thing. i ended up with the 3800x because it was on sale for only 30$ more and came with 2 games i was interested in instead of just 1
Generally I would agree but I got 2 free 60$ games I would buy anyway for 30$ more than the 3700x… The 3700x only gave me 1 of them…so I spent 30 to save 60. Still came out on top
It’s worth noting that even AMD didn’t have true 8-core CPUs until Ryzen, they put two cores on the same pipeline, so you really had 4-core CPUs with what amounts to hardware-level multithreading.
Games in general don’t like splitting up their tasks since they’re usually interdependent and can’t wait for half and instruction to be finished.
Yeah fx series was a dumpster fire. Apparently they were fun to overclock if you were into that, but otherwise they were terrible. I never used one and wasn’t really into computers at the time so this is really all hearsay
Oh yeah amd has been the budget kings for a long time. Now all of a sudden they are also nearly on par with Intel for applications using only a couple threads, and thoroughly trouncing them in most heavily threaded and multitasking workloads.
The thing that concerns me is that AMD had to completely overhaul their architecture and go all the way down to a 7nm die process just to catch up to Intel’s 4 year old architecture on a 14nm die process. I worry this may be the best they can do, especially since they don’t have the R&D budget Intel does for post-silicon development. You can’t really go further than 5nm with silicon substrates.