Yup - that was it. My bad for not digging through the manual. Thanks!
At the least, impressed that my ear holes still work.
1 Like
Same here. They seem to have totally different uses beyond the same $150 price tag. Studio reference headphones with a neutral sound signature arenât what the Sivga is trying to achieve, or a good point of comparison.
1 Like
Hey guys has anyone compared them to the sivga sv006 on a zen can?
Ivâe got the OG 006, hopefully ill get to compare them and the Sv0021 later today
1 Like
What is the difference between OG and the other version? Cause I donât know which one mine areâŚdamn
2020 / 2021 i think is it when it came out, was the case it came with grey fabric or black?
grey fabric
Itâs Z. What did you expect? The guy is more of a YouTube entertainer/comedian who likes headphones and pushes monetized purchase links than a serious headphone reviewer.
2 Likes
Then its the 2020 version, the old ones came in a black case
I just finished sitting down comparing the SV0021 and the RĂDE NTH-100
listening to 10 totally random songs on the IFI zen dac + IFI zen can (i used the SV00 SE, didnt use a balanced cable), switch back and forth after each song
i think i prefer the NTH-100, but its a matter of taste, while the SV0021 is more âexcitingâ with more energy, the NHT-100âs overall more balanced approach, was much more to my liking but i can see arguments for both being very valid.
2 Likes
EQ below. To Optimum Hifi Target.
Based on DMS, measurements from twitter. The last filter is some anomaly from AutoEQ, as the DMS data only goes to 10k. Not sure whatâs going on, but it is influencing the lower correction, so either leave as, or if removed, you should manually tweak the second last filter.
In any case, to me, without really trying to fully optimise, this is a big improvement.
I guess for a lot of people Optimum Hifi would not be the target of choice (for me itâs a good baseline), but it can be easily converted to Harman.
1 Like
Howâs the bass extension? The headphones I own have a lot of sub-bass rolloff.
The SV0021 bass is has more âomphâ but its a double edged sword in this case itâs more muddy, while the NHT-100âs does have some power but is more subdued to leave the bass clean.
Also side note - when switch back and forth between the 2, there was quite a bit of volume differences, if i had a song set to 10-11 oâclock on the SV0021, i would have to raise it to around 1 oâclock
1 Like
I am enjoying your EQ settings quite a bit. I like the headphone without EQ a lot but itâs great with EQ.
1 Like
Cool, itâs just a start, could certainly be refined.
1 Like
Mine arrived today. Donât want to echo what everyone else has already said. They do sound impressive, especially for the current price. No EQ = slightly more bass and not enough highs coming through for me. Using the IFI Black Label and turning on the 3d feature helps get the treble on more equal footing. I too understand about the âwanting to keep turning up the volumeâ thing. The sound is rich and has depth. IE they donât sound cheap.
All that said, have only been listening for a couple hours. Need more time for a real review.
It may be RĂDEâs first headphone, but not their first YouTube community engagement. An interesting difference is that instead of just the usual gang of headphone reviewers, most of the reviews are by creators - particularly ones who have highly visible branded gear. Of course this makes perfect sense given that they are the target audience, but interesting insofar as these folks are not used to reviewing headphones and often have a different perspective.
Iâve assembled a RĂDE NTH-100 playlist which currently has 32 videos including RĂDEâs own NTH-100 playlist featuring the as-required-by-marketing shots of precision engineered pads being put over cascades of lustrous sound-blocking and seal-breaking hair. Most of these are predictable and of limited interest to us, though one valuable recurring observation from the folks who are interesting in monitoring recordings and previously relied on ATH-M[345]0x, MDR and 280 Pro is that these sound more like the actual sound they are recording, i.e. they really are neutral/natural.
After breaking in for over a day with white noise provided by the built-in source in EasyEffects via the Topping E30 and L30 combination which promises to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth about my audio collection, my NTH-100, purchased with a nice stand from B&H Photo Video for US$155.99, just finished a second round of my demo playlist and have nothing of substance to add to what youâve heard and read about the headphones: sturdy, comfy, easily driven, undistorted with a long slightly microphonic proprietary cable.
I do have a different interest about which I accidentally teased myself. At first I was perplexed at the amazing bass and sparking highs, but then noticed that in saving my preset, the Bass Enhancer, Exciter, Crossfeed and EQ plugins had turned off the bypass settings. This demonstrated good possibilities for what I want from this headphone: not to always listen to the true true, but have a neutral point from which to add flavour including tubes and op-amps in my pre-amp and DSP rather than trying to EQ the idiosyncrasies of other headphones to neutral or combined Harmon, then try to modify.
I donât have a problem. I can quit any time I like. Photo does not include the Avantree Aria Pro on my head, the other BL-30 and maybe others.
got mine this afternoon spent some time with them listing some initial impressions
build is solid I would rate it as Beyer tier (but with a removable cable on the budget end!)
comfort: clamp enough to stay on your head but not enough to cause discomfort, pads and headband are nice and soft, for me the pads are a bit small one of my ears will always touch the side which while not uncomfortable is annoying/distracting I find myself adjusting them every couple minutes trying to fix it but havenât been able to, if you have smaller ears this shouldnât be an issue
sound: these have a bit more bass than I was expecting from a âprofessionalâ headphone, definitely not basshead level but enough for enjoyment listening seems pretty even with the mids without bleeding into them, vocal focused songs sing (pun probably intended) on these with how intimate they are, people seem to be conflicted on the highs for these? I wasnât sure if to expect lackluster or overwhelming but for me it seems pretty middle ground, enough energy for what needs it but definitely not fatiguing
In my opinion for the $150 these seem to be a pretty good option for a well built solid at everything closed back, however Andorama has a $250 list price for these which gets it into the territory of other companies mid tier offerings and I donât feel like it really belongs there
all in all a great start for Rhode headphones hopefully they improve upon it for future products
EQ MKII Feedback appreciated.
First 2 filter adjust bass. You can modify these to taste.
Preamp: -4.5 dB
Filter: ON PK Fc 37 Hz Gain -1.2 dB Q 1.14
Filter: ON PK Fc 71 Hz Gain -5.0 dB Q 0.54
Filter: ON PK Fc 425 Hz Gain -1.4 dB Q 1.17
Filter: ON PK Fc 1625 Hz Gain 3.1 dB Q 1
Filter: ON PK Fc 3820 Hz Gain 2.7 dB Q 3.38
Filter: ON PK Fc 4200 Hz Gain -1.2 dB Q 3.35
Filter: ON PK Fc 6700 Hz Gain -3.9 dB Q 10
Filter: ON PK Fc 7598 Hz Gain 7.5 dB Q 7.16
Filter: ON PK Fc 8500 Hz Gain -3 dB Q 4
Filter: ON PK Fc 15000 Hz Gain -4.4 dB Q 0.5
3 Likes