đŸ”¶ Tin P1 - Planar IEM

My favorite metal test albums are Mick Gordon’s Doom 2016 soundtrack (Rip ‘n’ Tear in particular) and Andrew Hulshult’s Dusk soundtrack. Both of these are very well produced and rip n tear will literally immediately show if a headphone can’t handle midbass layering like that.



Also those are some good recommendations, thanks.

Edit: it’s a shame most of PIG’s early stuff isn’t on streaming. Also is Chinese democracy a legit GnR album (like original members) or was it just Axle Rose with other random people?

1 Like

Chinese Democracy is Axl Rose, Dizzy Reed, and an enormous cast of session musicians and temporary band members that would make Wu Tang blush. By that time, Slash was gone, but some of his wor was incrorporated into some of the songs. Same with Duff McKagan.

But, honestly, does that make it not really GNR? Sure, Slash and Duff are gone. Matt Sorum was replaced first by Brain, then by Frank Ferrer, both of whom are awesome. It’s not like Tracii Guns was around, or Steven Adler. Izzy Straddlin had been gone for a long time, and honestly he was probably more the heart of GNR than anyone but Axl. And how attached were any of us to Gilby Clarke, really?

Instead, we got a lot of Chris Pittman, who is very good, Buckethead, who is one of the best guitartists on the planet but arguably just stylistically inappropriate for most of GNR’s work, Richard Fortus, who is great, and Ron “Bublefoot” Thal who, in my opinion, in addition to being an absolutely awesome metal guitarist, is exactly the type of guy you’d want if you were trying to bridge the musical gap between the southern-rock-cum-thrash-metal that GNR used to be and the 21st century electro prog rock Rose clearly wanted them to be. There’s also Paul Tobias, who is geat, and Josh Freese plays a surprisingly large role, and he is outstanding.

Other fixtures during that time included Robin Finck, who was Nine Inch Nails’ touring and sometime session guitarist on lead. Sean Beavan, longtime industrial metal producer, was involved for a long time, as was Caram Costano. Sebastian Bach was arond for a while and did guest vocals on one of the better tracks. Billy Howerdel, back when he was kind of a nobody, was involved on an uncredited basis for a long time. He ended up being a critical cog in A Perfect Circle.

Is this the “real” GNR? No, I guess? But If you ask me, neitther was the group that put together a lot of Use Your Illusion II (UYI I was mostly cover material and music written in the Appetite-era sessions and shortly thereafter), much less the group that toured on it. The “real” GNR from that era, if you ask me, was Axl, Slash and Izzy.

Chinese Democracy works best if you embrace three things: (1) go into it with no expectations, (2) accept that there is no “real” GNR after Appetite, other than Axl - and I really think that’s the case, and (3) if you like the style Rose was attempting when making the record.

I remember someone (probably Chuck Klostermann?) once saying that after he wrote *November Rain," Axl Rose realized how good GNR could be, and decided that there was no point in recording anything that wasn’t as good everything GNR could possibly do all at once, and he spent the next 15 years trying to make that happen with Chinese Democracy.

It helps a lot, too, to remember that at this time, Rose was trying to figure out a new way for GNR to be, knowing, I think, that trying to keep making Appetite would be sad and pointless, and that he was really obsessed with acts like Nine Inch Nails and Moby, and really excited by the injection of electronica into rock music at that time, all while resolving that there was no point in making any song at all if it couldn’t be fuckin Liberace, Queen, Led Zepplin and without losing relevance to nu rock, Linkin Park, etc.

With Chinese Democracy, he did not achieve that. What he did achieve is some bizarre adnd amazing prog rock electro thrash piano masterwork that’s super long but much more focused still than UYI I and II. It has a lot of obviously flawed and a couple of clearly failed tracks on it. But at its best, it is an epic and timeless metal opera only Axl Rose could’ve made, and only with the help of literally dozens of the finest producers, session men, guitarists and other creatives he could get his hands on.

I defy anyone to put “There Was a Time,” “Madagascar,” “IRS,” “Prostitute” and “The Catcher in the Rye” against anything GNR composed after 1988 and tell me those don’t deserve a place among the highest this band has ever produced, below only a handful of tracks from Appetite and UYI collectively. Several of those songs did begin life with Slash and Duff around, in the early/mid-1990s. Even the less univeresally lauded tracks like “Sorry,” “If the World,” “Chinese Democracy” and “Shackler’s Revenge” are creative, fun, kinetic and timeless in ways than anything - if we’re being honest with ourselves - that the “real” GNR could’ve made at that point.

Honestly, I think we live in a better world where we got Chinese Democracy, It’s 5 O Clock Somewhere and Contraband instead of whatever hte “real” GNR would’ve gotten through in the next 10 years.

2 Likes

Have you tried powering them with a tube? Pairing them with a Little Bear B4 / B4x does add some warmth to them.

You really should start a music history thread.

1 Like

Haha. What you see there is the better chunk of my rock history knowledge, other than some trivia about industrial and encylopedic knowledge of the nine inch nails catalogue.

The making of Chinese Democracy is totally crazy, as you might imagine for an auteur-produced album made over the course of 15 years with literally dozens and dozens of contributors and spanning multiple eras of rock and media trends, and delibrerately traversing numerous genres.

The Rock N Roll True Stories account on YouTube has a lot of fun modern rock history stories, and its sister account, GNR Central has a even more material about just GNR.

That being said, I think a thread on this site in which the various members tell the stories of their favorite artists and albums would probably end up being pretty fucking awesome.

3 Likes

So, I don’t understand tubes all that well, except that apparently proper tube amps consume enormous amounts of electricity and color the music in a very warm, organic way. Which seems like it’d be good for getting that “analog hifi sound” for organically textured recordings like jazz, blues and classical. Basically filling in the “warmth” that people believe digital audio kind of robs music of, compared to live material.

The other impression I have is that the more mordern, more-affordable hybrid tube amps (like the Cavelli) do the bulk of their amplification work in conventional circuit realm, leaving the tube as essentially a kind of inline distortion-creator. I may be misinformed there, but that doesn’t sound like what I’m going for.

Here’s what I’m really going for with this P1-THX888-RDAC combo: most of my music is highly dynamic, dense, and synthetic - most of which I think would almost have to originate in the digital realm and, if not, probably be mastered or at least mixed in 16- or 20-bit PCM, but definitely PCM in any case. So reckoning with the mores of digital sound cannot be avoided - the best I can do is hope to reproduce the final recording properly. So a lot of the sacred cows of analog hifi, like tube amplification, seem kind of anathema to that goal (or at least beside the point).

I think this is the videophile sensibility I’m applying here. Ultimately, or video, there is an objective reality: the best you can hope for is to reproduce the choma and luminance value of each pixel that was created when the medium was mastered to video. You can punch up certain content with tweaks if you want, but in reality, if you want everything to look as good as it can on balance, the best thing to have is accuracy to the source, and as high-resolution a source as possible.

So, the focus is first on clinical accuracy. I think the P1 offers those qualifies due to the speed the planar technology offers, as well as its very linear tuning. I just need something in my chain to warm it up a tad basically to make up for the inherent weakness of planar, being the extension and intensity of bass, as well as the kind of clinical sound. I think the RDAC will do the job there, because to my ears it produces a nice soundstage with good imaging and very natural, dynamic sound, but it produces a good bit of distortion of the “warm” variety - emphasized lower mids, little bit of rolloff in the high end, resonant bass.

I just need a little more bass, really. I figure if that can’t be achieved with this setup, then the thing I’d need to do would be to go to a better overall IEM that can match the detail of the P1 without the issues with bass, but from everything I’ve read, the next best thing up the food chain could easily be in the $1000+ range (assuming the detail and neutrality are non-negotiable), and I’m just not gonna spend that (
 yet) on headphones. And this way, if I ever do, I think I can feel confident I’d be feeding “true” hifi IEMs a very clean and properly decoded signal.

2 Likes

Typically modern music is produced in a 32 bit space and then mastered in 24 bit, and then dithered to 16 bit

1 Like

Sure - but what about synth-heavy music produced in the 1980s?

Yeah lol those were most likely not made in a 32 bit space. They were either mastered only to Redbook or also to tape or perhaps a vinyl master

what’s the reason for that? and for example why have some albums be 24 bit and others 16? assuming both are recorded in 24

A 32 bit space can provide many advantages for composition, tracking, and mixing, as being able to record signals over 0 dBFS so you prevent clipping in the digital space so more headroom as well. It can also be more efficiently handed by the PC so smoothe editing. It is also technically higher quality too with more samples that can be taken

Some don’t feel the need to release in 24 bit, and just settle for a traditional cd quality release

1 Like

oooohhhh interesting, guess that makes sense! thnx

24 bit is also much more demanding on data size

HOKAY, well, at long fucking last, my whole desktop setup is up and running: my PC out via USB to the Massdrop Airist R-2R DAC, out through Blue Jeans Cable RCA connectors to the SMSL SP200 THX-888 headlphone amp and it is 
 transcendent.

Turns out, it’s true what they say: the P1s need juice behind them to sound their best. In particular, I notice a lot more mid-bass and a slightly warmer signature. I’d say the bass has gone from “technically present but very obviously lacking, even to a non-bass-head” to “tight and subtle, with some sub-bass rolloff.” The overall signature remains clean and very clinical, just like I’d hoped.

The RDAC definitely calms the treble down a good bit, maybe a touch more than fans of planars would want, but it does so in exchange for providing a more natural sound that is a little easier to listen to while still packing a wallop. I ran through my industrial staples and they all sounded phenomenal - punchy and clear, with great separation and a sense of space, albeit not vast space.

It doesn’t sound like sounds are coming from your right and left ear, but it also doesn’t sound like some expansive stage. I recall one or two reviewers essentially saying it feels like the sounds are all coming from distinct and spatially separate places inside your head, and maybe like a foot around it, and I think that’s definitely the case.

Somewhat surprisingly, these things really came alive when I put on my Appetite for Destruction Super Deluxe Edition in 24/192 FLAC. “Shadow of Your Love” blew my face off. I no longer have a face. That is my review.

5 Likes

Well then I guess I need to buy an M11 to drive them and then buy the P1. Best review

have the same amp and waiting for su-8 to arrive, hopefully it satisfies P1 :slight_smile:

1 Like

It should lol, that’s more than plenty to get the p1 going to their mostly full potential :+1:

An ifi micro iDSD powers them just fine on normal mode/gain and with the warmish Burr Brown Dac chips and bass boost the P1’s are f’ing banging :+1:

I for one really don’t understand this power thing. Like, to me, it shouldn’t make a difference how much excess power is available from the amp. If something can power the planars up to a certain decibel level at X frequency, then why would something that can supply 100 times as much power make it sound any better at the same decibel level at the same frequencies?

To me, it shouldn’t. And yet, here it is, plain as day: bass with the SP200, no bass from my phone’s headphone jack. The difference being that I listen to these at probably 85% volume on my Note 8 and about 10% voulme on the SP200. The knob is at like 7:30. Legitimately, I think if you turned this thing most of the way up, you’d probably damage the P1s and, if not, then your own ear drums. Either there’s something I don’t understand about power (OK, there’s definitey a lot I don’t understand about power, obviously) or this is a very weirdly convincing psychological phenomenon.

Can someone who understands this stuff better explain it?

1 Like

Not claiming to be an expert, but I think it has something to do with the fact that different frequencies have different sensitivities (db/mW) and I think even different resistances (ohm). So while it may be easy to get good volume out of your phone at 1000hz, at 50hz or 15000hz it may be much more difficult. Also if I am correct about the differing resistances (like I said, I’m no expert) then the power draw at those frequencies could also be much higher, especially peak power draw.

To put some made up numbers to it, if your phone has a Max power output of about 80mW, the P1 may never draw more than 10mW for sudden loud ~1000hz sounds. But when there is a hard bass hit the power draw may momentarily jump up to close or above 80mW. This would mean you phone would either struggle to power that kind if load, causing distortion and other issues, or the phone literally can’t output the power being requested, causing those frequencies to sound anemic or possibly even clipping. Like I said, I’m no expert. This is just my understanding.

2 Likes