I’ve been wondering how different listeners perceive the technical aspects of speed of their IEMs.
Obviously the physical materials that make up the drivers are going to have an effect on the speed of an IEM, but I am curious if there are different factors like driver type, tuning, tip selection, insertion depth, etc. How do you measure the perceived speed? Do you have favorite tracks to test speed?
Let’s have a discussion about your opinions surrounding speed and IEMs you’ve personally heard that were exceptional or horrible at portraying it.
I’m listening to the IT00 this morning and it sounds very fast. Unfortunately, I wrote it off because of the channel imbalance on my first set. I really hope the problem was just with some units because the IT00 really is a fantastic sounding IEM.
I believe the IT00 incorporates a graphene driver which might be the secret to its speed success?
I wonder if there’s a way to measure the speed or if it can only perceived?
What is the speed of a beryllium driver? Is there a difference between coated vs solid?
This is my personal go-to track to test speed…
I compare how fast/crisp the leading edge of transients are and if there’s any smearing to the sound. In addition how quickly the sound ends and if there’s any decay or smearing to the decay. Softness in very fast passages with strong transients tells me the IEM has difficulty portraying speed properly or realistically.
I’m wondering if it’s a combination of everything or not? Driver style, if the IEM is hybrid or not, its tuning… etc… If an IEMs FR has a lot of bass energy, I think it’s going to be more difficult to portray speed quickly and keep those frequencies detailed compared to an IEM that is lacking low end energy.
These are just my guesses though since I don’t know the facts about this topic.
I dont think being a hybrid/tribrid affects the speed.
But you are most likely right about the bass quantity, if the iem has a lot of bass that usually is slower than an iem with lower bass quantity. This is something I have taken notice of in my collection.
Which is why I am always so impressed when an iem has a lot of bass quantity but is still very fast.
I visualize it like this. Imagine you are throwing a punch. Higher Bass quantity = punching with your entire arm stetched out.
low bass quantity = punching just a little bit.
When your arms is stretched out longer it takes a longer time for you to pull it back in comparison to stretching it out shorter.
That is why when you someone punches very hard but is still very fast, that is very impressive.
Same thing with the bass speed/quantity.
Very interesting. I think we have varying opinions here?
I was wondering if you have a hybrid or tribrid IEM with say… 1 DD, 4 BA & 2 ES, are all of those drivers matched at speed? Is the lowest frequency driver the only one that is really important to be the fastest? Are they all running at different speeds portraying transient attack at different speeds possibly muddying the replay?
In my opinion the speed is most important for the bass. Although some instruments like violins/cellos usually have a lot more texture in BA´s than DD´s so that might be because the BA´s are faster and can simulate the sound of the strings more naturally while DD is a bit too slow to fully reproduce the texture.
EDIT: What I mean by most important though, is that IF the bass is slow, it will muddy the ENTIRE sound. While if the treble is slow, sure there might be less texture for string instruments but that wont F up the rest of the sound.
No, they are all going to give different speeds, with the es drivers going to be the quickest and the DD the slowest. This can be adjusted for with crossover design, dampening, and shell design I would guess
That’s what I thought. Developing and tuning for these earphones has got to be a nightmare. Then just imagine driver unit variation! I’m guessing that not every single driver is going to be the identical speed of another even if it is the same model.
Just like every computer chip is different and capable of over clocking to varying mhz. Some are more efficient than others. It just boils down to luck.
I have issues with est designs because of coherency imo. They just don’t know how to integrate them as well as ba and DD imo. You end up with a bit strange timbre with unusual transients, that just sound off from the rest of the design, you trade natural sound for pure resolution which I don’t like. I’ve only heard a few that actually impressed me with how well they were implemented