Xduoo XD05 Basic (AK4490) Review: "This is not chi-fi, this is great engineering."
TL,DR: This is a big review of this big block of metal full of surprises. Tested with Sennheiser HD6XXās, Fostex T50RPās and Nad HP50 headphones. The XD05 is the perfect companion to enjoy detailed music on the go (macrodetails). And when you get home, you plug it straight into a better headphone amplifier, and it will show you all the little details (microdetails) hidden in its great AKM chipset implementation. Yes, this is also a great desktop DAC (I mean, itās as big as one too). It will also take bitperfect audio and switch Bitrate/Khz when a change is detected, via USB (my Android phone) or via coax. This is ālow-cost hi-fiā paradise, really. Itās a bit like the Fiio BTR5 for people who need power on the go. Definitely a great value⦠Even at full price.
If you buy this new, youāll probably get the ESS version. But the original āXD05 Basicā had the AK4490 chip. I bought mine used, and got an AK4490. I honestly hoped my XD05 was the version with an ESS chipset (inexpensive implementations of these tend to have a prevalence for treble), because my desktop DAC is an SMSL Sanskrit 10th, with a prevalence for bass and low-mids (which is, I believe, an AK4493) and I wanted a change. Well, I got my XD05, played some songs, and I actually thought it was an ESS chipset⦠Until I opened it and realized it was an AK4490 inside. Implementation is everything, and itās a well-implemented AKM chipset. A surprise at this price point. Neutral, clear, detailed, with sufficient treble, whether portable or not (plugged in an external headphone amplifier or not). Some cheap ā read: bad ā AKM implementations can sound muddy: Definitely not this one. Good.
Details:
The XD05 Basic is damn fast. i.e.: Fast, loud details are perceptible and never lost in āmudā, one detail never covers another because it happened too rapidly before or after. Fair warning, this is not a portable ādetail monsterā. But, like, āwhatās the pointā : Youāre probably always surrounded by noise. You hear a lot of good things with the XD05 Basic at medium to high volumes. Drums hit hard. Voices sound natural, and quite believable actually. Loud voices, loud guitars, loud instruments are all full of details. And I donāt even know the name of the thing, or what it is made of, but in songs with (real) drums, I can clearly hear if the āround puckā hitting the bass drum is made of ārubberā, or if thereās a bit (or a ton) of cloth over it, or not. Clearly. Simply put, the āamount of times Iāve told myself it sounds life-like to price ratioā with this ~150$ thing is incredible. Thanks to the XD05, I think I now know the definition of āmacrodetailsā (versus subtle, i.e., āmicroā details). In the worst case scenario (like⦠treble-y T50RP planars) these āmacrodetailsā can be a problem, though. Headbang responsibly, enjoy macrodetails with moderation.
Technicalities, gain and powah ā Level 3 gain is useless/broken:
More importantly, the headphone out got a fair amount of soundstage, naturalness, instrument separation and depth ā even with my T50RPās, which some people say often sound āmechanicalā and ālifelessā. Not here. In terms of naturalness and macrodetails, the XD05 Basic can even make my T50RPās sound a bit like my Sennheiser HD6XXās, something that 100$ desktop amplifiers (JDS Atom, Liquid Spark) never did. Impressive stuff.
This headphone out is also 500mW of power @ 32 ohms, so you can go anywhere and rock your planars with it ā and thatās what I do. This is a portable 500mW per channel metal brick that will hit your ears like a metal brick if you ask for it. On gain level 3 itās a bit too much, though. The three gain levels are like, ā4/10, 8/10, and 11/10ā. Gain level 3 is overdone, max gain and half volume with T50RPās is painful and I believe I even hear distortion sometimes. Itās just too much. On top of that, thereās channel imbalance unless the volume is high, sometimes too high. So the gain stays at level 2 on mine, and smooth music sounds smooth and energetic music sounds energetic, with no trace of distortion or channel imbalance whatsoever.
The DAC part: āAnd oh, you wanted more subtle details? Surprise: the DACās got itā.
I also use the XD05 Basic as a ādesktop dacā, using the USB input and the 3.5mm coaxial input ā yes this exists and yes adapters exist ā and the 3.5mm output, which is a āline outā, i.e.: DAC mode, no volume control, straight to my Aune X7S (a 300$ Class A desktop headphone amp). Another surprise: This DAC can be more detailed than my SMSL Sanskrit 10th desktop DAC. The Sanskrit 10th is a great DAC. Iāve enjoyed, discovered, and re-discovered hours and hours of music with it. Itās hard to play anything with this DAC and āhurt your earsā. But itās ātoo smooth to be life-likeā. Thereās too much bass and mids in female voices, for example. So, guess what, I exchanged it with my XD05. The XD05 Basic is now also my preferred desktop DAC. (Funnily enough, the XD05 Basic is an AK4490 chipset and the Sanskrit 10th is an AK4493. Did I tell you āimplementation is everythingā ?)
As a desktop DAC: Coax (to computer) + USB (power/recharge) in + USB (to computer) + 3.5mm line out (to speaker/headphone amps).
An odd quirk is, to activate the 3.5mm āline outā (i.e.: always 100% volume output, to use the XD05 as a desktop DAC), you need to turn on the XD05⦠by turning the volume knob up. Which means youāll also be able to power a second pair of headphones via the unitās headphone out at the same time. Well, why not. Makes A/B-ing stuff easier. Or bring a friend. 
Bluetooth part: LDAC is great, but may be unreliable.
Yes, I also got the little bluetooth module. Play, pause, next track and last track buttons on it are useful. It works great⦠when LDAC works. I remember having it set to 990kbps (24bit/96khz and forced āhighest qualityā), and it still managed to add a bass boost and compress my 16bit/44.1khz/320kbps (or less!) mp3ās, making it a night-and-day difference when I removed the module and used the āUSB INā instead. Oh well, maybe itās my phone, too (ā¦even if it said LDAC in the Bluetooth infos on my phone, and the ābluetooth moduleā light was white, which also means LDAC data is received). Or maybe I got one of the 100 Android or USB Audio Player Pro config options wrong that time. Anyways, good luck. (By the way, if LDAC changes from 990kbps to something else, youāll hear a little, very subtle āpopā.)
Iām not done: You can also switch opamps. And it makes a HUGE difference.
I also bought this XD05 Basic used, with a Burson v5i opamp in it⦠which I promptly uninstalled. There were ācracks and popsā between songs, and sometimes when turning the volume up/down. Something was wrong. And the cracks and pops between songs even happened via the 3.5mm line out. I also felt like I was drowning in mids, which, among (a ton of) other things, completely killed the soundstage. Maybe the Burson v5i could be good for the 1 watt per channel XD05 Plus/Balanced/etc., but was too much for the XD05 Basic, which is half the power? I donāt know. Anyways, all this review, all the technicalities, all the problems with the gain mentioned in this review, it was all with the XD05 and a JRC 5532DD opamp in it (the stock one, I guess).
I also tried a TI NE5532P opamp⦠It smoothens everything, to the point of making the XD05 āboringā. The bit I said about being able to know what kind of āround puckā was hitting the bass drum? Iāve just learned itās 100% because of this JRC opamp acting kind of like a āpeakyā bass boost (at 75hz-100hz?). So, whatever Xduoo did, the XD05 responds very well to āopamp rollingā. Another surprise. Yup, the XD05 is not āchi-fiā. This is great engineering.
Battery (batteries) life(s).
Well, donāt forget to charge your phone. And donāt forget to charge your XD05 Basic⦠and donāt forget to charge the bluetooth module, too. Still:
- I was expecting the mini bluetooth module to die first⦠Until I checked the website and it said it had 12 hours of battery life. I probably used it more than 12 if not 24 hours already, havenāt recharged it yet.
- I was expecting maybe 6 hours of battery life for the XD05 itself⦠With T50RPās, max gain (ā¦donāt), volume at 11 Oāclock, blasting mostly electro, rock and metal, I got 10 hours. This is basically the worst case scenario.
- I was expecting an external, battery-powered DAC to still drain my phoneās battery power a bit: Nope. Even with USB Audio Player Pro and the screen option set to āalways onā, I lose one percent battery life every 5 minutes.
- By the way, you can play music while charging the XD05, too.
So if youāre worried about battery life⦠Your smartphone battery will surely die first, after more than 8 hours of music playing.
Small downsides:
-Under the sun, you canāt see anything on this screen. Activate the bluetooth āmoduleā, youāll see the blue light. Power the XD05 on, with a bit of luck youāll see the āorangeā ring around the volume knob. But the screen basically just looks like a mirror. If you rely on it, just crank the volume, find the right input with the switch and wait for the āhappy jumpscareā to confirm you still have battery.
-It will never shut down automatically after X minutes of (nothing) playing. I forgot it on in a room and the battery just drained. So, donāt forget to turn it off!
So, for all these reasons, I repeat: This thing is ālow-cost hi-fiā paradise, really. Itās a bit like the Fiio BTR5 for people who need power on the go. Definitely a great value, even at full price. The XD05 is not chi-fi. This is great engineering. Iāll watch Xduooās stuff more closely from now on. Iāll probably buy another XD05 Basic (the ESS version) to compare with this AKM chipset version. No, this is not an āendgameā DAC/amp combo. But for 150$? This is great stuff.