đŸ”¶ 7HZ Timeless Planar

IEMs / Other [Official] IEMs / Other
2555

I think the Timeless needs a bassy warm source. Can you recommend some portable ones ?

2556

My favourite is XD-05 bal. It’s still clean but not as neutral as topping, for example.

2557

Qudelix 5K can be as bassy and warm as you want it to be. Or not, if that’s your preference.

4 Likes
2558

I don’t use bt but thanks. I ordered this for the 7hz Hopeless , maybe the 4Vrms helps

2559

The Qudelix 5K is a USB DAC as well. You don’t need to use the BT on it. The built-in PEQ also works on wired DAC mode.

4 Likes
2560

And it has autoEQ built in! :slight_smile:

2561

I use the Ifi Hip DAC and find that everything I like about the Timeless just gets better. I think planars just like more oomph, the TinHifi P1 being a prime example. I run mine on high gain, no XBass and it just sings. Even better on my desktop set-up via the XDuoo MT-604, then it’s glorious!!!

1 Like
2562

Anyone having them on a Chord Mojo?

2563

do you experience hissing with the hip dac high gain mode ?

1 Like
2564

I generally listen to the Timeless via my FiiO M9 DAP on 2.5mm Balanced with High Gain ( and Balanced Boost) with no observable hiss. Equally, I find no hiss when attached to the Hip DAC when using either the M9 as a source or when using my Samsung A50 & USB Audio Player Pro. Just a greater all-around sound. Planars LOVE power. As an analogy, you can make a Ferrari do 100mph in 3rd gear, but it does it so much better in 5th. Some headphones and speakers just run better with a greater heft of power behind them.

2565

yo i’d take those off your hands if still available i love collecting tips >: )

1 Like
2566

The FiiO M9’s 220mW power enough for the Timeless ?

2567

OP’s not replied yet but @ttorbic has first refusal I’m afraid.

2 Likes
2568

I have a random collection of spare tips. I’ll DM you

2569

I would say so, yes, easily. It may be harder to drive than many IEMs but it’s still an IEM. It has an impedance of 14.8 ohms and sensitivity of 104dB/V which is 89db/mW.

The Qudelix 5K (max 4V / 240mW) quotes voltage on the volume screen, at 50mV / 0.17mW I calculate it’s at 81dB and it seems loud. That’s almost 1,500 times lower power than the max. I couldn’t go remotely near that without blowing my ears out. So I suspect 220mW would also be fine.

Regarding the hissing, I haven’t tried on a HipDAC but I doubt you’d get hissing with these. You typically get hissing with very sensitive IEMs and these aren’t sensitive, they are quite hard to drive.

2 Likes
2570

I mean what you’re saying is that it doesn’t make much sense to buy an amp with 1200mW out, because it won’t sound any better the Timeless.

2571

My desktop amp is 1.5W, but I use them on the Quedelix or BTR5, both of which are 240mW. They’d be fine on a 1.2W amp as well, but you wouldn’t need that or be using anywhere near the max. They are fine on the Quedelix or BTR5 which have similar max power to the Fiio M9 you mentioned, 240 vs 220 makes no significant difference; I’m nowhere remotely near the max power on it. I think these are the sort of IEM you sort of do need an amp for, more than most IEMs. They don’t sound as good out of my laptop. But portable amps with 220mW should be more than enough.

2572

I’m not a techie but my Timeless
chain DX312 > MT-604 (MT-604 maxed out and use the DAP as a pot) both the og P1’s and Timeless suck up a lot :zap:without getting exponentially louder just “better” not like say Andro’s and other low impedance BA set’s so :man_shrugging:

2573

“if we put the shit on the shelf there won’t be any jam yet” :slight_smile:
Happy new year guys !

1 Like
2574

So far my experience with the Timeless has been indifferent to source. Playing between the JDS Labs Element II from my desktop, from the BTR5 and direct from my phone (Motorola X4) it’s the same. If I had to pick the Bass is a hair more controlled in the Element, but is so small of a difference that may be Placebo.

Edit: autocorrect changed some word to Portuguese, sorry.

4 Likes