yeah, definitely, the Timeless is great value for the money. But if youâre chasing that better sound quality dragon, I think it makes more sense to me to save for a significant upgrade @ $600-700 over buying a couple of $200-300 sets that are really only sidegrades to the Timeless.
6 Likes
Track to test the highs. Oh10 is tad too high for my liking. Timeless has better overall presentation. But damn the OH10 bass thoughâŠ
I own the dunu Zen. And have heard (and returned) higher tier. I have found price to have very little correlation with sound quality (after a certain point). I would take the timeless or oxygen over most of them. Same goes for over ears. Thatâs why I am interested in this price class. It seems this price class offers amazing options.
4 Likes
I think thisâs a great album to test Timelessâs technicalities âŠ
mids, upper mids shineâŠâlipstick on the glassâ where as the mid bass/bass suffers from the sub bass boomâŠa slight tuning tweak and theyâve got it 
2 Likes
Iâm not saying that more expensive gear is always better than less expensive gear. Iâm saying that it sounds like your tastes in tuning is similar to mine (Mele, Oxygen, Timeless), and in my personal experience, the Ups are a significant upgrade to those, with similar tuning characteristics but with overall a very different (i.e. better) sound.
It seems unlikely to me that youâll find a similar upgrade near the Timeless price range, which is your stated goal in the post I was responding to. I imagine if there was a significantly better set than the Timeless with similar tuning to the Timeless at the $200-300 price range, you would have heard of that by now.
So rather than spending $200-300 for several sets that end up being sidegrades like the Oxygen, one could just buy one $600-700 set that is a real upgrade for the same money. Seems like the smarter move to me if youâre after the best sound quality. If youâre after the most diverse experiences via sampling lots of gear, I suppose buying several sidegrade sets could fit the bill.
7 Likes
Itâs not an upgrade, itâs simply something with unique and special properties. The timeless has that. The fiio fh7 has been recently suggested to me for some unique properties. I havenât tried it yet.
I own the zen because of its unique capabilities. Very little is likely to beat its slam and other presentation. The oxygen is good and I enjoy it, but it doesnât have that same uniqueness. Itâs not uniquely good at anything, itâs generally competent at a lot of things. The oxygen is my favorite background daily driver for that reason.
The xenns up might be that. But the way people talk about it, it sounds more like the oxygen. And thatâs great. But, itâs not really what I need or want.
The reason for this price class is there are gems in it that have a few capabilities that run close to elite options. The mangird tea is fantastic for vocals, that didnât stay in my collection because of other issues.
Also, there is such a thing as too much bass for me. For some of my music both the oxygen and timeless cross that line. But they still handle those things well due to their other attributes.
So, yes, itâs more a collection of things that I would reach for for uniques reasons.
Odd, that sounds very different from the post I was originally responding to:
Iâm not sure why youâve dug in your heels like this on something you havenât even heard but Iâll withdraw my recommendation. I personally like it when people say âI like the same things you do, and here, hereâs something like that but better that you havenât triedâ but my posts seem to have rubbed you the wrong way. At this point, it sounds like itâs personally important to you to be ârightâ about this, so I would guess given how opinions and perceptions work that youâll find things to dislike about the Ups at this point.
For anyone else who might be wondering about possible upgrades, I do think the Ups is one of those, a pretty noticeable upgrade despite how much I like the Timeless. And I notice that Dan of Danâs Audio Reviews is selling his set for $525, a screaming deal I would jump on if I hadnât already bought mine.
2 Likes
The only IEM Iâve sold lol.
1 Like
The only IEMs I will keep 
.
2 Likes
Agree to disagree 
3 Likes
I think you made a great recommendation for the general listener that others should hear (and I agree with, even not having heard the xenns up yet)
But I wasnât asking and havenât really shared my full goals. But since itâs causing confusion here, I will:
I am building a collection of IEMs that donât cost an arm and a leg for reference points on quality.
Let me give you an example: kz dq6. This crazy inexpensive IEM has the most well rounded soundstage I have heard to date from an IEM. Now, I have not heard the âbigâ soundstage IEMs. So that may not be a great statement. The primary difference is it has a much stronger center imaging capability than just about everything else I have heard. The next IEM for well rounded soundstage (and I will compare them directly later) is the 3dt. I will keep the dq6 while I wonât keep the 3dt. As of today, it is the reference point for soundstage.
Bringing this back to timeless, cause this is the timeless thread, it does a number of things better than some of the higher tier stuff I have heard. I find its sub-bass more elevated and intense than any un-equed over ear planar I have heard. Itâs extended treble, though intense, is much smoother than any IEM I have heard so far. And it very much provides that smooth planar clear sound.
The zen provides the cleanest and most impactful bass I have heard in an IEM (and frankly, also beats most overears I have heard). But I bought the Zen well before the goals of my collection were well established. Itâs not leaving the collection because it serves a purpose, but, if I were building from scratch today, this probably wouldnât be in the collection due to cost. (Though the fdx1 might have stayed if I didnât own the zen)
The dusk wouldnât be in it either. But, again, bought it almost a year ago.
So, the xenns up donât fit that goal. It has very little to do with it being a good recommendation for a timeless upgrade.
Sorry for the confusion.
3 Likes
I received the timeless today, and I have a problem with them, in the R side it rattled arround the mid to upper mids (firsts seconds in the music count the people . My hope is to be the filter that rattle so if I can pull it off maybe stop it, but I donât know how to do the extraction, if someone could help me I be really grateful
Ps: if I did a big grammatical mistake tell me, Iâm Brazilian and Iâm trying to learn
3 Likes
My pair showed up a couple of days ago. Out of the box with the included tips was underwhelming. Thin sound with no real excitement. I switched to some Comply foam tips and they magically came to life. Must have been the seal. From there I tip-rolled to some ML Spiral Dots and the sound pretty much stayed the same but removed the somewhat muted treble of the foam tips (or the wide bore did its thing). Unfortunately, they made my outer ear hurt after half an hour or so, otherwise I would stick with them.
Swapped out the cable for the ALO silver-plated Litz that comes with the Campfires, and no real difference that I noted. I have some CP100+ tips coming early next weekâŠweâll see how that goes. Only 50 hours on them so far, but they sound just fine on most everything I have thrown at them. They donât really remind me of any over-the-ear planars like others have mentioned, but the bass is definitely of the planar variety. Have not tried any of the other included tips. I suppose I shouldâŠthey were free!
4 Likes
You totally killed the bass ? Why ?
2 Likes
Itâs adjustable and i havenât totally killed it. If you open a tone generator and start at 20hz thereâs still plenty.
As for why? For my taste, thereâs way too much of it.
3 Likes
OK, seems odd, but you do you.
1 Like
Iâll be honest I just got my pair in yesterday and to me literally everything is spot on for what I like, besides the bass just being too strong. Might not agree with that adjustment exactly, but I guess I shouldnât be surprised when people called them bass boosted.
1 Like
What about 1.5-2.5k? I notice this actually bothers me the most and too much mid-bass just exascerbates it. Really good IEM otherwise.
I have seen more people complain about the lack of extension after 2.5k, so that is interesting that you notice that as a problem.
Since the type of music can make or break and IEM or headphone, maybe it is a matter of not matching your library. What are you listening to that doesnât sound right? Is there a time stamp in a song, or at least a genre that is causing you problems? Maybe knowing that will let someone find a better match.