Hey guys, here are some of my initial impressions when comparing the Soloist 3X GT vs the Soloist 3XP. I may provide more of my thoughts later as I am still continuing to test some of the features and other headphones I own.
Soloist 3X GT vs Soloist 3XP (Using both with their super chargers)
Listened on:
NEW Meze Liric headphone
Low gain on Soloist 3X GT at 20
Medium gain on Soloist 3XP at 25
Thieaudio Oracle IEMs
Low gain on Soloist 3X GT at 20 (slight hiss sound from amp)
Medium gain on Soloist 3XP at 75
Equipment:
Topping 90se DAC into ONE Little Bear to switched back and fourth between amps
Songs Used:
Feeling Good by Michael Buble (Vocal testing)
Six Cold Feet by Hugh Laurie (Vocal testing)
Weāve Just Begun by Sinne Eeg & The Danish Radio Big Band (Vocals and treble)
Bubbles (Soundstage and low end)
Soundstage:
Sounds pretty much the same to me otherwise
(Crossfeed set to medium) It is more spacious with the Soloist 3X GT. Its a bit more rounded than the Soloist 3XP.
Vocals:
Sound the same to me on both. If there is a difference it is very slight in that the Soloist 3XP could be ever so slightly harsh (very subtle here though)⦠but this is nit picking if anything.
Low end:
There is a touch more in bass on the Soloist GT. But both are really solid.
Treble:
It is a bit smoother on the Soloist GT
Soloist GT - Other Improvements:
- There is no popping noise when I connect the XLR connection to my headphones on the GT (This will stop on the regular soloist but it needs time to warm up. Around 5 minutes or so.)
- The RCA left, right and sub out have made my desktop come alive. It sounds really smooth and enjoyable
- Lots of headroom for driving any headphone you own. (I kept pretty much everything on low gain except the HE6se v2 and the DT800 at high gain. It was around 20)
- Crossfeed is pretty good. But only on low or medium. I didnāt really care for it on high gain as it was a bit too much. It does open up the stage a bit. (Can also depend on the song as well)
Issues:
One gripe I have on the Soloist GT is the knob. While it is nice that it is larger, it also has a problem where it is a bit too sensitive. It can be frustrating when you are trying to change the gain or crossfeed and it selects a different option. It becomes a game that no one really enjoys playing lol.
Other thoughts:
The Soloist GT has a bit too much probably for most IEMs seeing as there was a hissing sound and was around 20 on the volume with the Oracles. (Crossfeed feature on the Soloist GT once again made this enjoyable when using it on an IEM. It gives more of that outside of your head open stage which usually IEMs donāt really provide.)
Final Thoughts
So I know Passion for Sound said that the unit is ācleaner, smoother, spacious and tonality accurate ampā⦠I think take this with a grain of salt as from what I am hearing they are really rather similar in their performance IMO. If any thing these differences are ever so slight. I would say that both amps do a great job and I donāt see myself parting with either one. I think if you are someone that wants top of the line amp, that you can hook up to some active speakers and subwoofer⦠and you donāt want to worry about ādo I have enough power for said headphoneā, then the Soloist GT is a solid purchase. I would think you would be pretty happy with it. But still if you are looking to save some money⦠the Soloist 3X is still a solid purchase and you canāt go wrong there. (Plus you can save the additional money and get a TOTL headphone instead).