Goober's Journey Into the IEM Game or "Why Are You Not As Good As....?"

The places I think I would say DM is a step up and upgrade on Olina SE are midrange and how they interact with the bass elements, resolution (in some ways), and overall performance.

The midrange on Olina is clean, clear, accurate. They produce exactly what you should get in the playback. Dark Magician is a little forward in the lower-mids and while it’s not a BIG difference in timbre or tonality, the extra warmth in the upper-bass/lower mids is more satisfying. Like I said, there’s almost nothing I’ve experienced that is on the same level as the DM’s mids, let alone better.

I don’t think Olina SE is lacking much in resolution but because the Dark Magician’s entire frequency is tighter, the treble doesn’t have to be boosted to give more clarity and be present. It’s a little more effortless there.

In the end, this comparison cleared up somethings about Olina SE for me. It’s a fantastic IEM in it’s price point and it is still an easy recommendation overall. It’s a very clean, safe playback and I do prefer it over the OG still. But as I’ve listened to more things (in it’s price range and above), I reach for Olina less and less often, not because it’s bad but because it’s dull. As a person who gravitates to jack-of-all-trades but master-of-none sets, this is my jack-of-all-trades of the jack-of-all-trades.

It’s a very good benchmark IEM, that doesn’t stand out as much to me anymore, because I’m getting my hands on things that replay my whole library too, but bring some special sauce to the table.

That’s where the jump up from Olina makes sense; Olina is great when being good enough at almost everything is satisfying. If you want anything more than that, you have to step up in class.

3 Likes

Was looking forward to this review and I’m not disappointed one bit. Very well written and you add a unique and humorous flair to it that is refreshing and different. Can’t wait to see you get up there with the other reviewers. Hopefully 2023 brings some big things for you in your review journey.

I’d like to take a moment to also tag @nymz on this as it was his set before. I’m curious at this point how many hands it’s been in. Not sure if he was the original owner.

Happy New Year!

5 Likes

I was the first and only owner, bought directly from Ethan :slight_smile: Glad people are loving such gem!

3 Likes

Extremely well written, and concise. Nicely done, dude! Your opinion seems to line up nearly identical to mine. The mids are creme de la creme. Like I said in my initial impressions article last month, the only set that matches the DM happens to be the MMKII and those will set you back $400 more. Now the Monarchs are more of a well rounded set in my opinion, the boost in the bass helps with the EDM and Disco part of my library, along with having a wonderful and unparalleled level of detail in the mid-range. However, from what I remember, the DMs have this unbelievable texture with vocals that the Monarchs don’t even touch. I used to think, before I tried the DMs, that the Monarchs were the benchmark for vocals at or under $1000 - but nah, the DM is (Considering the sets that I’ve tried of course).

Mac and Cheese, let’s goooooooo! Completely agree with that comparison btw!

2 Likes

The Rikubuds Collection or The Time I Caught ‘Em All

Amongst my holiday bounty, I came across two situations that have come together to make for a very special opportunity. @vividici_111 was selling his Grand Rider, and I have very publicly stated that the pair of @Rikudou_Goku’s Rikubuds I was most likely to want to buy was going to be in the Rider class, so I decided to snatch them up. The second situation wasn’t a me-thing but I get to take advantage: @MMag05 loaned @domq422 his Rikubuds collection and as a part of the deal, I get to have time with them too. So now I went from zero Rikubuds to having Berserker 1 and 2, Lancer 1, Saber 1, and Assassin 1 in my possession, as well as Grand Rider 1 and a prototype Berserker-class earbud that I now own. So we have seven buds to talk about. Let’s get after it!

Songs to Listen to and Follow Along:

As usual, I’m going to write my thoughts in generalities, but I’ll give you a sample of songs that I listen to, that will relate to the concepts I write about. Feel free to ask for specifics, if you don’t keep up with my thought processes.

I’m Your Bass Creator - Basshunter (For the bass)

Holding On (Rome In Silver Remix) - Dabin (For female vocals, tonality, mid-bass response within mix From 1:12-1:36)

DISINTER MY HEART - TRAILS (For treble response and resolution, male vocals, midrange response)

The Curse - Agnes Obel (For violin tonality, layering and separation From 1:45)

When I Fall (Outta Love) - Kevin Olusola (For Imaging/detail retrieval :00-:07, tonality, timbre)

We Want It So Much, We’re Getting In Your Head; Nothing Can Stop Us, We’ll Make It To the End

One thing that has made this review a little bit of a struggle to write is the simple fact that there are so many sets to go through, and in a lot of ways, there is not a whole lot between them. The first conclusion I can come to is that there isn’t a bad Rikubud, even if not all the sets are not my cup of tea. In that vein, I’m going to work my way through the minutia in order to give you my opinion on how each set does, and why you may want them.

Starting out, I’ll go with Assassin. In my time with Assassin, I found them to be a vocal specialist. The overall signature sounds like it de-emphasizes the bass and treble regions, in order to put the midrange on full display. Doing this creates a larger sense of soundstage; there is quite a depth to be found there. This is accomplished by moving the vocals so forward, but the consequence of that is instruments (especially instruments with more bite like brass) step back and can get lost in the track. I’m willing to bet that pulling back the bass and treble plays a part in creating the larger soundstage I hear, but the tonality is off for me. These are very good for what they do best, but they’re not a set I would be drawn to as I look more to all-arounders.

Next up, we will go to the Berserker class and the three different variants I have; the B1, B2, and B-Prototype. In terms of the B1 and B2, I know they are marketed as bassy earbuds, but I’m not hearing them quite that way. They certainly bring bass presence, but it’s a more neutral bass overall. B1 is a very clean, punchy bass that trades blows with Saber 1, while B2 is boomier and a little more sub-bass emphasized. They both have solid soundstages and good technicalities; vocal tonality is close to Assassin but not quite as good. They are both better in instrument tonality. B1 has a bit of an advantage here in have a better treble response for me, as B2 is absolutely tuned to be darker and smoother, but it takes a little too much off for my taste. B-P was tuned as a step up to the normal Berserker class, as an attempt at a Grand Berserker, and that tracks to my listening experience. This is the bud that best exemplifies the Berserker class to me, as it has a punchy mid-bass like B1 and a sub-bass closer to B2. When I put xBass on my hip-dac with the B-P, I finally feel like I’m getting what the vision for the Berserker class is. It lacks a little bit of treble for my ideal clarity, but I’d say it’s the best of the trio here, and a fine representation for what is available in the Grand Berserker 2. I liked it well enough, but it’s not my favorite tuning in the Rikubud family. I’d say across the board that these are perfectly serviceable earbuds for the right circumstances, but none of which are main courses for me. But a meal with a satisfactory appetizer that prepares you for the next courses is never a bad thing. I’m going to end this review there, so next time I will go over what I think are the cream of the crop in the Rikubuds selection I have: The Grand Archer 1, Saber 1, and Lancer 1. Which Rikubud will stand above them all? Find out in part two. That’s going to be it for this review. Enjoy your days, and take care till next time!

Ranks: Assassin (B-), Berserker 1 (B-), Berserker 2 (B-), Berserker Prototype (B)

Ranks With Personal Bias: Assassin (B-), Berserker 1 (B-), Berserker 2 (B-), Berserker Prototype (B)

Combined Rank As a Food: Quiche hors d’oeuvres

10 Likes

Listening to both the KBear Storm and HBB Khan within 6 hours of each other makes me love and hate the budget bracket at the same damn time.

God fucking dammit, man!

:rage: :face_with_symbols_over_mouth: :rage:

1 Like

Day One Impressions of QKZ x HBB Khan & KBear Storm

I’m going to go with a Pro/Con approach to this, rather than going into a ton of detail. I’m certainly going to give these two more time to get a good handle on them.


(credit to Ian Fann and his squig)

QKZ x HBB Khan (2DD - $39)

PROS

  • Implements the “Variations”-style tuning better than Truthear Zero with better note-weight presentation
  • Can actually tip-roll unlike TE Zero
  • Strong bass response from 20-100something Hz
  • Clean, open midrange allows for good details and replay
  • Can have good male or female vocals (but not both concurrently, see cons)
  • Has good treble extension overall

CONS

  • Upper-mids perceive VERY forward. Intimate soundstage, can be intense sounding
  • Still can find the note-weight thin with clearer/treble tips. Still mandatory to use bassy tips
  • Mid-bass tuck is still too present for my taste
  • Bassy tips are better for male vocal tonality, treble tips better for female, haven’t found middle ground yet
  • Vocals pushed forward, can lead to sibilance, instruments can be fatiguing
  • Lacks treble bump in clarity region for my preference

KBear Storm (1 DD - $15-19)

PROS

  • Tip-rolled to Tri Clarion tips, shifts emphasis slightly off of mid-bass towards upper-mids/treble. Treble clarity is highlight for me
  • Mid-bass focused lower end for mid-bass fans
  • Upper-mids have high amplitude, but good slope in pinna gain. Gives presence but not as much shout as graph may indicate. Highly beneficial for vocals
  • Soundstage is superior in the budget range: Width and depth are very good, actually shows some height. Bass/lower mids and upper mids/treble elements have room to play and interact with each other

CONS

  • Lacks sub-bass emphasis due to mid-bass focus
  • Upper-mids/treble could still have some shout/sibilance issues with increased volume
  • Some recession in lower-mids, can be muddy if you are looking for forward, clean mids
  • Technicalities are average, not standout overall
  • Build quality sucks. Shell is unnecessarily big, VERY plasticky feeling
  • Yet another side grade in $20 price bracket

Got questions? Ask away!

6 Likes

What kind of music do you think works well with Khan?

1 Like

Khan especially good with EDM?
Are technicalities boosted compared to single DD around the same price?

Seems like some Khan’s cons are pros to me lol.

Although I’m getting mine tomorrow, how is Khan vs QKZ HBB? thanks

Absolutely looking forward to seeing what this tuning is all about. I’ve yet to try an IEM with such an emphasis on tucking the mid-bass, even the MMKIIs don’t dare tuck the mid-bass this heavily.

I’m also just sat here wondering what kind of music this works for? I’m a man who likes his warmth in the lower mids, balances female vocals out for me.

1 Like

It works with most things. It’s fine for pop, r&b, jazz, classical, blah blah blah etc. etc. It’s bright-leaning (it’s not cold and analytical, it’s got warmth) but it’s lean without notable mid-bass heft. That’s not something I’m going to enjoy in a bassy set.

They play EDM fine enough. Sub-bass is very good, the tracks play clean, but (recurring theme) I miss the mid-bass. It’s not there.

I don’t have QKZ HBB to compare them to, but from memory HBB is going to be warmer, thicker, and darker than Khan. You’ll hear the thinness in the mid bass, more perceived upper-midrange, and brighter treble (unless I’m just nuts).

I can already tell you the hype train is going to leave the station for the Khans, but I’d rather listen to the Storms. But that’s because I want more mid-bass, and while the Storm has more upper-midrange energy than Khan, it is less emphasized in the mix and sounds less aggressive and fatiguing.

If you liked Truthear Zero, Khan tweaks a few things (more bass, a little less upper-midrange energy) and balances the tuning better, so it’s more of a good thing. If you didn’t like Truthear Zero, this is not magically solving the problems that those sets had. They’re still there, it’s just more tolerable. I don’t think these are more technical than Truthear Zero either, and I thought they were average overall. Decent resolution, bass separation from the rest of the signature is a highlight, I wouldn’t say imaging is night and day better; they’re closer to average than above average. Good drivers like CRA or Rosefinch are as capable as the full range driver in Khan.

4 Likes

Your not nutz :melting_face:
tighter midbass pulls upper mids at you.
I’ll send a HBB to compare with and have in your stable

4 Likes

That would be clutch, because I do feel like I need to give HBB another shot and feel it out some more.

I tried xBass on my hip-dac just now with Khan, and that would clean up a LOT of the balance issues I’m having on them. If they had that extra bass boost that went into the mid-bass, I’d grade them a lot different. When I test them on Q5K, they’re going to not grade as well.

I’m going to need someone to go $100ish, put a REALLY good DD in for the full range, stop trying to be the Variations and put some stank in the bass, and just own it. Then I might fuck with this more

3 Likes

Sounds like VE SIE

1 Like

Who-what-now?

Probably this:

image

2 Likes

Thank you :blush:

1 Like

This is a visual representation for why I’m not on the Khan hype train, as is. Set is really good but that’s way leaner of a signature than I like.

I think Khan is a good execution of a sound signature I don’t care for, at the end of the day. If you don’t like lean mid-bass, there are options

5 Likes

Day Two Impressions of QKZ x HBB Khan & KBear Storm

  • On advise of my general counsel, I tried Khan off of 4.4mm balanced and on single-ended and the 10Ω impedance is real. These make way more sense now.
    • Lesson learned: Khan is for 3.5mm listening. Thanks @domq422

  • Storm is a different tuning and that’s going to scare a lot of people off, but I’m liking it. These make me more curious about sets like the NF Audio RA10/NA3 and QOA Gimlet.

Two different ways to skin a cat, but they work in their own ways

3 Likes