Over the Olina and Timeless?
2 Likes
Ummā¦can we all talk for a minute?
Because Iāve been listening to the TRN TA1 Max, and it is astounding how little this gets talked about as a $50 hybrid banger. Please tell me Iām not crazy here, cause Iām kinda impressed!
1 Like
I wouldnāt say the KAI is detailed or technically stands out at its price pointā¦ more like in your face bass. It lacks treble extension and stage depth. Wouldnāt recommend it for what heās looking for. High-volume bass blasting is what the KAI excels at 
1 Like
I would give it a chunk more than that in that it really feels to be one othe the most musical single DD sets that works great with pretty much any genre to listen with fatiue free long listening sessions that Iāve heard yet. 
To each their own though 
2 Likes
Elixir is currently the most technical available DD under $300. I do not think KAI can compare with it. Is it worth 3x the price is another question.
Do you own KAI too?
I think Vortex would like a word with you.
8 Likes
Have you heard the Olina or the Timeless to be able to compare to the Elixir?
I have the Olina, but not the Timeless. I do have S12 though. As I understand, Timeless is less bright than S12. It should be similar in technicalities. As you prefer technical IEMs, I do think you made a good choice. I just hope 7hz ironed out the QC issues.
1 Like
Yeah I think I will get the Hana since I want something out of the box first! They look pretty looking too!
Thank you so much again! 
1 Like
My ears, a lot of others , and not many sales, would disagree with that declarative statement.
Rock, R&B, Hip Hop?? Elixr is about $100 over priced
Tanch 02, Hana 2021, SEEK Real Starship better tech, res, than Elixr.
IMO
4 Likes
Np! Glad I could help, and donāt forget to put on those filters if you want BASS
1 Like
How do you feel about the Airship? Think itās worth getting over the Timeless?
Yes. Love Timeless but planar is a developing tech (in mini form) and that driver and variations of, have some oddity in treb and stage/depth that is different and some chalk it up as ābadā while I think it is different.
An engineer used the term āplanar humā a few years back and that is a good way to describe something I have no vocabulary for.
Done well, it is precision and natural (called fast), earphones are in the early stages despite the wave right now. IMO
I would take Airship but love Timeless and understand why others do as well.
3 Likes
I would say planar stage depth or rather note depth is bad because it is unnatural due to the uniform motion of the planar diaphragm.
Itās like squishing a world globe 
against a flat surface. You get virtually all of the texture but none of the dimensional, spherical, dynamic physicality, so you get to see more but itās not analogous to how you would perceive it in reality.
5 Likes
Thanks for the advice man, love your channel!
1 Like
I have been using the 7Hz Salnotes Zero for a while now and I must say, I have been using it as often than I was expecting. Audiophiles who are broke and in need of a budget, can survive with just the Zeroes.
2 Likes
You would percieve more detail in reality vs your typical iem DD so both have their trade-offs. Iām sure weāll see larger driver/semi-open back chifi planar iemās in the future that will solve that.
I think the design issue for planar and electrostatic is the dynamics/slam of them. You can compensate by making the driver larger comparatively to standard dynamics, but then cost goes up. If you make the diaphram have a larger travel distance that means the magnetic assembly/stators need to be farther away meaning you have to have more powerful magnets/voltage or the driver will be less efficent etc. Its a cost issue either way to make them truely compete imo. I like all driver types except maybe ba, but they all have tradeoffs to reach a high level.
3 Likes