The crosstalk on my unit measures at -59db. I contacted ifi support and they said this is normal and intentional.Here is how it looks.
Ah yes, this is intentional! Thanks for checking in with us.
Yes it has a lot of crosstalk. Iāve just checked with my HD600 and crosstalk is very audible when you play only one channel you hear it in other one. In ballanced itās less loud then in s.e.Then I tryed my Asgard 2(class A) and it has pretty audible crosstalk also, but less then Zen Can.
Then I checked Liquid Spark, and this one has almost no crosstalk even on very high volume just a litlle bit.
Also I tryed Asus DLX amp and no crosstalk too.
Just for curiosity I checked Zen Dac built-in amp and itās too has very litlle crosstalk, but i donāt like the quality of this built-in amp, Zen Can sounds better.
I would like IFI to explain why they made this amount of crosstalk in Zen Can. The point of balanced amp is to have more separation? In real life I dont notice it.
How does the Liquid Spark comparer to the Zen Can? Iāve heard they are similar.
Crosstalk is always unwanted.
Crossfeed is intentional and wanted.
my bad got it confused haha
I doubt that i can distinguish Liquid Spark, Asgard 2 or Zen Can in blind test on HD600. But I have Monolith M570(Sendy Aiva clone) these headphone love Zen Can. I donāt know why but M570 sounds really better on Zen Can even then Asgard 2. For Me Zen Can sound a bit brighter then Liquid Spark or A2.
by the way crosstalk was discussed on audiosciencereview a lot and someone whrote 'Crosstalk measurements are interesting, no question, but as a sidenote, in headphones no crosstalk will amplify the dreaded āplaying in the headā effect." I donāt know is it true or not.
Thanks for linking this Serge!
Hi all - I have a question.
Just got a Zen stack recently but 4.4mm cables are expensive for me.
Can I use a 3.5mm to 4.4mm balanced adapter on the zen can so I can take advantage of the balanced headphone output of the CAN?
Like the one on the photo.
Thank you.
Hi! Welcome to HFGF!
Unfortunately, no. Thereās no good way to use an unbalanced (aka single-ended) cable on a balanced output. An unbalanced cable doesnāt have enough conductors and will end up shorting out the output.
You can safely adapt a balanced headphone cable to a single-ended output, but not the other way around. If youāre US-based, Hart Audio Cables is an economical solution for cabling needs.
The adapter in your photo is for using a 4.4mm balanced headphone in a single ended 3.5mm jack. Iām reading the text of your post as wanting to use a 3.5mm headphone in the 4.4mm balanced port. If you have a 3.5mm headphone use the 3.5mm port on your amp. The only common adapting of the 4.4mm balanced port should be to 4 pin XLR.
What headphones are you wanting to use n the 4.4mm output?
Thanks for the welcome!
I see. Very good info to know. Thank you so much!
Sorry - I posted a different photo.
Itās supposed to be 4.4mm male into a 3.5mm female.
So I think the explanation of WaveTheory covered it.
Thank you as well for taking time to read and answer my question.
Just confirming what folks have said here - unfortunately, there is no proper way to do this!
Happy to answer any more questions if you have them.
Hi all,
@WaveTheory Thank you so much for the review, I really enjoyed reading it a lot!
Iām currently looking for a reasonable priced DAC and Amp for my DT 1990 Pros and am currently favoring an Ifi Zen DACv2/Can stack. Since balanced outputs generally seem to deliver more power, I have already ordered all the stuff needed to mod my 1990s for a balanced input via 4.4mm Pentaconn on an amp.
In the review the DT 1990s were mentioned in the āunfortunateā section because the Zen Can introduces distortion on 250-ohm DT headphones in the low end and especially when using the XBass.
My questions:
- Regarding the 1990s, would that distortion likely be noticeably less when using the Zen CANās balanced output?
- Alternative: Since Schiit products (Modius, Magnius, Asgard 3) are not readily available in Europe, would a Topping A50s (15V power supply, 4.4mm balanced out) combined with the D50s DAC be a better choice than the Zen stack for the DT 1990s?
Thanks, Chripo
Hi! Welcome to HFGF!
Nice can!
If youāre comfortable doing it, modding a Beyer DT is often handy. I would recommend that you mod it dual-entry detachable, or at least balanced detachable, so that you can use it on a SE output as well.
Yes. The CAN might be borderline OK for this headphone. I canāt say for sure though.
Schiit needs to get their schiit together in international distro, for sure! I was not a fan of the A50s by any stretch. What price can you get a Lake People G103s for? Thatās our standard entry-point amp rec for our EU friends.
I will try this mod which replaces the original 3-pin mini XLR connector with a 4 pin mini XLR. Additionally, I plan to make a corresponding cable with 4.4mm Pentaconn plug together with a separate 3.5mm TRS plug to 4.4mm Pentaconn jack adapter for SE outputs. Hope to get along with these for a while.
Thanks for your review and opinion on the A50s. From reading stuff on the web, I had the impression that it would be a good choice in the price range of about 200EUR/USD, especially when using balanced out (SE seems to be less capable though).
On Amazon, the G103-S is 269 EUR, A50s 199 EUR and the Zen CAN 169 EUR (without iPower, which would add another 50 EUR).
My thoughts on these three are as follows:
- G103-S: most likely the best sound on a Dt 1990, highest price of the three amps, no balanced in- or outputs, no stackable DAC (could e.g. use it with a Topping E30), not very attractive case, maybe not very portable due to the large power connector used.
- D50s/A50s stack: should deliver enough power on the balanced output for DT 1990, no balanced input, very nice looking small sized stack, should easily be portable in a backpack.
- Zen DAC/CAN stack: most likely lacking power for DT 1990 even when using the balanced output, lowest price when not considering the additional costs for iPower power supply, balanced in- and outputs (but balanced in does not noticably improve sound quality), nice medium sized stack, should also be portable in a backpack.
Would that be a reasonable summary for the three options? And how would a Schiit Modius/Magnius stack compare to these? If that stack would offer the least compromises, I would consider ordering it directly in the US.
Any feedback is greatly appreciated!
āChripo
I wouldnāt worry about balanced at this price point. Hereās why:
Itās still potentially forward-thinking to balance mod your DT1990 if you can do it safely, because it will open up the possibility of a wider range of amps to use down the road. Balanced amping does not inherently sound better, though.
The G103-s is probably the best sounding amp you have on that list. I havenāt heard it myself, but I trust those who say itās the real deal at the price point. You donāt have to match it with a Topping E30, though. You can use a Zen Dac V1 or V2 with it just fine.
You will get sound.
I like the Zen DAC just fine as a DAC. Iām not nearly as high on iFiās entry-level amps.
This is a wrinkle I didnāt expect. Do you need transportability in your setup?
If youāre gonna order Schiit gear, I would strongly suggest the Asgard 3 amp. IMO itās the best <$200 headphone amp on the market right now. With shipping and customs, it might be close to the price of a G103s (?). My recommendation for you, if itās isnāt too much money, would be to use a Zen DAC as a DAC and connect it to either a G103s or an Asgard 3.
Good luck!