Philips Fidelio X3 & SHP9600

Alright, so while the time I had with the burn in and sitting down with the x3 the shp9600 has been on a backburner just casually being burnt in with time on my other system. Needless to say it’s had longer time to burn in than the x3 had during this little review but I think I have a good general idea of this headphone now. As mentioned earlier… I use Flac and lossless as much as possible but I also test gaming use case.

Note: the more I sat and thought about this, comparing the two, the more I grew a bit irritated. Keep in mind that I don’t believe the x3 or 9600 are bad but like anything in this world there can be improvements

Games use: Soma, Far Cry 5, Nier Automata, Escape from Tarkov, Counter Strike, Valorant, Planetside, Halo 3

Headphone compared to SHP9500

Build Quality: The build quality on the shp9600 is rather questionable. It does look better but if you study it a bit it’s a ever so slightly changed alternative to the original shp9500 there really isn’t much in terms of difference here… It does look better but I wouldn’t say build quality wise it feels better in fact they feel pretty much the same. The pads and band strap are the same as well as the cable that comes with it. Clamp force has been improved but not enough in my opinion and could possibly loosen up with time all considering… there just isn’t ample enough clamp to keep me properly invested once again… it quite seriously seems like Philips doesn’t pay attention to the big complaints on their gear as the clamping force was a consistent issue for a lot of people. Build wise it just looks nice but it doesn’t inspire a lot of confidence at it’s price point considering it’s damn near the same as the 9500 is. though I give it props for looking that much better it’s much nicer in my opinion.

Cables: These are quite literally the same cables as the 9500 except now the silver connector has 9600 written on it. Same length same material and the more I look the more I question how does philips justify this price point considering both the build and cables are essentially the same. Surely they couldn’t possibly expect 3 times the price point of the 9500 for just a slight retune, prettier aesthetic, and some slightly better clamp could they? So the cables still terminate at 3.5mm to 3.5mm detachable same long lengths between one another

Soundstage: I really can’t tell much of a difference here the staging sounds so incredibly similar it could very well be the exact same size as the 9500.I picked up the x3 and x2hr and they are definitely still larger than this I am left wondering how they figure to advertise “spacious sound” on the shp9600 box if it’s the same headphone in this regard as the 9500? Size and width wise it’s still relatively large but in this price bracket there’s still quite a bit bigger

Imaging: the imaging seems to be slightly sharper but this could also be a placebo effect. While the shp series doesn’t have real image issues they aren’t laser accurate and could definitely have improvements. The imaging is fine in most cases for this price point depending on whats available to you

Seperation: no surprise here but it’s on the same level as the 9500… while the seperation is good the imaging and soundstage doesn’t particularly make me think it’s all that grand in this regard either it doesn’t sound differently here than my 9500 at stock.

Pad Swaps: before I get into the sound signature I wanted to address this. The original 9500 can use modhouse adapters to change out the pads. Now, for some unknown and very stupid reason the 9600 cannot make use of this due to the fact the clips are now inverted… it’s as though philips saw people using the adapters and flipped everyone off with this subtle yet extremely annoying change. This change absolutely destroys a lot of worth I see in this headphone as I am sorry but the pads aren’t anything special, they are sub par velour that feel rather grainy just like the headband. The 9500 you can change the pads as you can just also pop off the headband’s padding and change it out… you can still change the headband on the 9600 but you just can’t change their pads less you fight with the adapters. If there was actual proper adapters for purchase or alternative pads, which is extremely common for the 9500 to use different pads, I wouldn’t say anything. This dramatically changes my perspective on the 9600 and makes me think that philips truly just pays no attention to the issues with their equipment. The adapters can of course still be removed by themselves but I think they may have used even more adhesive this time around and the adapters themselves have a form fitting factor this time around so it has to be very particular or it won’t fit. Granted we can still tape the hell out of the modhouse 9500 adapters to it but it may not seal properly giving an off sound.

Sound Signature: hit or miss but better than 9500 more refined.

Bass: One of the things one will notice when getting to the shp9600 from the 9500 is the difference in bass is rather drastic… there is a lot more impact, more rumble, more quantity, the headphone definitely no longer sounds so boring. While the bass doesn’t extend very deep the bass can still be found very satisfying it can be compared to placing a thicker pad fabric on the shp9500. Rather quick, detailed, and punchy I think this is definitely an improvement over the bass of the 9500 however, the question I have is that is this just the extent from the change in clamp force or really a different in tuning? I sat with the 9500 and pushed them harder to my ears and I heard what appears to be a very similar result so I am concerned here that it’s primarily the clamp in this regard doing this if so upon further use that clamp force may deteoriate and the headphone will be essentially another 9500. Take this as you will as the bass is extremely enjoyable… I do feel it has been retuned as the quality overall here has been improved the correct word would be refined.

Mids: Clean, clear, the added punch seems to push some vocality slightly back but nothing too severe. No complaints but the mids sound to be on the same level as the 9500 and if anything slightly cleaner. Again, I feel this may suffer a bit from slight boredom due to lack of warmth however, outside of the potential of using a tube amp I can’t currently see a way to help this one. Good tube amps are expensive if you feel you want that more engaging rich warm sound from an shp it’s better to stay the 9500 until you can change the pads on the 9600 at the very least as a swap to a thicker pad can add more warmth and a deeper tone to the sound on both headphones.

Highs: smoother, there appears to be more detail across the frequencies but not by a whole lot, the highs don’t appear grainy or sharp just raised and satisfying. The added bass I noticed makes the treble appear not as bright but upon further look it appears to be on the same level as a 9500. The sound changes are very positive here and I really appreciate them.

Sound Signature is a subtle V signature while the 9500 is straight up a bright signature

Competitive Gaming: Pretty sure I have had quite the few questions on this one even to my inbox so let’s get to this one. The added bass is quite nice, adding immersion, and a sense of more fun to your sound. There wasn’t a lot of rumble added to the sound experience so while using this it just felt like a slight change to the 9500 while competitive gaming. While this is fine, I would recommend the shp9500 for someone just looking for a cheap entry level for competitive gaming this is because they are damn near the same headphone and the shp9600 is 3 times more expensive for little reasoning

Casual Gaming: quite nice and relaxing. I like the changes done to the sound signature. The clamp force keeps it on my head. No real complaints here well rounded and enjoyable. Soma scared the hell out of me while playing with this. The added impact and bass I felt brought this game alive much more… as well as games like far cry and other rpgs… I feel the 9600 is just more engaging and exciting.

Price Point: Currently the price tag is at $130 plus shipping, unless you have amazon prime or something, as well as taxes. The Total comes out to $139.09 after tax not including any shipping costs… this can potentially place the headphone at $150 or slightly higher if you have to pay for shipment fees. You can find Shp9500 for practically right at $50 and they are virtually the exact same headphone with what I can only say is really just a Retune in sound with a bit more clamp everything else is practically the same but for 3x more. The pads are currently unswappable outside of tearing into the adapters, no carrying case, no big differences, the same cheap material used as the 9500, no offense but this is rather embaressing to see especially considering just how drastically different the x3 is from the x2hr in terms of build quality and quality material used. I say this is a toss up depending on how much you see is worth it to you personally.

Will I be keeping this headphone? Debatable but the more I sat with it the more I realized probably not. I own multiple headphones including Subtle V signatures. I already own the shp9500 and the pads I have on it creative borderline the same sound signature yet for much cheaper. The cost to modify a shp9500 to the degree I have done lets see. SHP9500($50), V moda($30), Dekoni beyerdynamic Suedes($40), Modhouse adapters($10) or rather $130 plus tax may as well call it closer to $140 essentially the exact same price as the stock 9600 your going to end up spending more than $200 to fully modify this headphone if you wanted the same result and keep in mind I didn’t include the like $20 extra custom fabric I used to change my 9500 headband piece as that grainy velour was bugging the hell out of me. The 9600 is not worth more than a Beyerdynamic DT series headphone or post $200 headphones I will give it the benefit of saying maybe $200 max is the worth… so unless you appreciate it in stock I can’t say I see the 9600 as a worthy keeper. Stocks alright, just as I thought about it… not for me.

How did it response to equalization? Bout the same as a shp9500 so quite well honestly… Though why you would feel the need to equalize it is beyond me the sound is tuned to what I would call just right not boring yet smooth and good detail… it’s good for what it is in stock. The headphone is the same power demand as the 9500 so you don’t need a lot of power backing it at all… a cheapo Syba Sonic amp/dac can bring this thing up to speed honestly.

Do you think this is better than the Tygr 300R for gaming? 100% No, Absolutely not. The tygrs have more detail in their sound, better clamp, more comfort, the ability to change their pads easily, higher build material, more soundstage, laser imaging. The two have a different signature. Tygr is a warm headphone with similar bass to the 9600 however the 9600 has more brightness. You can brighten up the Tygr by use of certain amps and some equalization it’s just a little picky honestly. SHP9600 responds better to equalizers and different amp setups. However, Tygr is more expensive and a bit misleading for gamers… In reality it’s more than $200 as it’s a headphone so it does not have a mic.

Should I buy the 9500 or 9600? Honestly, I would wait it out. I see a potential hard price drop on both the 9600 as well as the x3 as more people get to them and time causes depreciation. The headphone SHP9600 don’t hold their own against their competition appropriately, as you can even get a dt 880 for around $125 at 250 ohms. If the price drops hard for the 9600 I see this being more worth while but not at it’s current price point. Otherwise I still think the shp9500 is a fantastic item out of the gate… the only issue is like I mentioned earlier modifications add up fast. However, I actually prefer my SHP9500 modified usually more than my dt 880 despite the differences. I would tell someone to grab the 9500 before I say the 9600 though I would only say grab the 9600 if you prefer the stock as outside of that the price point to me just isn’t quite worth it. If price wasn’t a factor and you wanted a subtle V yeah I could see it being more worthwhile but theres the current pad issue in the way causing me to just say wait this one out.

This was a toss up for me the more I sat and thought on this and considering the fact that shp9500 is one hell of a budget headphone… This doesn’t feel like an ample upgrade… it just seems like a slight upgrade but more of a sidegrade… while they improved things other areas they took steps backwards. The build quality, the cables, the soundstage, the imaging, the pads, the lack of a case all of which went without approperiate improvements that really should have been better addressed. It just looks prettier with more clamp force and a better sound quality.

Sale wise, I assume the headphones will land on a christmas sale… if you want them… Suggest you wait till then.

3 Likes

Honeymoon phases don’t particularly get to me when I have so many other headphones that I love and appreciate in house at the same time. When I review something I try to be as fair as possible and look at all alternatives… Not everyone has an unlimited budget and we want a great sound as much as possible… better sound per dollar is always appreciate.

I suppose the shp9600 could be a great starter headphone for someone just wanting a good early entry point into open back V signatures as the headphone does strike a good balance in that sound signature regard not lacking dynamically but not overly sharp and bassy. If you can appreciate the signature of a shp9600 you will probably love the DT 990, Emu Teak potentially, and most definitely you would find a lot of appreciate in a Dan Clark Aeon

3 Likes

Im assuming the hd58x still pulls ahead of the shp9600

For me personally no

2 Likes

I wouldn’t say it does no. Good neutral jack of all trades headphone but wouldn’t say it’s an upgrade just a solid alternative

58x jubilee has good imaging and a relatively average sized soundstage with good bass and sub bass extensions and impact. It really doesn’t have a big downside but at the same time, it doesn’t particularly excel in any particular area in my opinion. At it’s core it’s a fantastic daily driver, which my experience with sennheisers is just kind of how they tend to be. 58x jubilee is quite something even amongst the gaming community but in terms of pulling ahead of shp9500 or 9600? No, the increase in sound quality I think is quite nice and once modified the shp9500 can stand above the 58x jubilee in some cases including soundstage but also versatility of sound they are essentially what I would call side grades

If you want me to get super technical… The shp9500 and 58x jubilee can go neck and neck even in competitive gaming however, the shp9500 has an edge in gaming as while it’s still also relatively neutral it has the bigger soundstage and brightness to back it up giving it what sounds to be more details however in terms of vocality I think sennheiser wins that in terms of flexibility and accessories you can use to modify the headphone that definitely goes to the shp9500.

9600 is a slight upgrade to the 9500 everything sounds more refined, more smooth, with more detail to it despite the other characteristics being relatively the same.

The next step up from a Shp9500 would potentially be the AKG K612 or rather better yet the K702 as this added the detachable cable and slight more refinement. While some may think this is a crazy comparison because recessed bass you can modify the bass on the AKG k702 and bring it up rather drastically through 1 of 4 options. 1 is direct modifications which takes some google searches, 2 is a change in pads one of which is of course the yaxi pads made for the headphone which are quite lovely and very comfortable causing the bass to be on the same level as the 9600 potentially more(the k7 series also uses plastic adapters on it’s pads so you have to be particular on what you buy), 3 equalization of course, and 4 one of the more rare cases which requires some study is the Kameleon amp(and potential alternatives) from DIYheaven which can immediately bring the bass to the flat line instead of being recessed this allows it to be on par with the shp9500 signature and further adjustment makes it a better option alternative to the 9600.

The thing about AKG though is that they have really stupid prices… technically a K702 if you look them up you will probably turn away saying well that’s too expensive. as out the gate they are priced stupidly at $300+ when in reality if you dig around more… you can actually find K702 at around $150 - $200. You can get an adapter, the same one I linked to over on the DT 1990 forum here, that allows conversion of the 3 pin mini xlr to a 3.5mm jack this gives it the same flexibility of the shp9500 as this allows access to v -moda but also the bluetooth dongle.

In comparison to the shp9500, 9600, and 58x jubilee the k702 has an absolute massive soundstage(granted x3 over there is astonishingly larger just ridiculous in size on that one) and suffers from ever so slight imaging issues but it still has better imaging than both the shp and 58x.

In this regard if one asked me what the step up would be, while a bit complex, would be the k702 for a gamer but only if they were okay with taking the extra steps… otherwise if they still want that flexibility in sound I would just tell them shp9500 and modify it or ya know tygr is always an option as well as 58x jubilee due to it’s neutrality

Muscality though, well shp9500 is nice I like it more for orchestra… I definitely think 9600 is better for EDM and other games that can use brightness and bass more… 58x jubilee is great for more vocal lovers but it can appear quite boring due to neutrality, k702 is mids and highs forward so vocality and orchestra sing quite well there.

With the customizable sound going best to 9500 and k702 respectively(granted if I recall correctly 58x jubilee has some adapters as well but it doesn’t change sound as drastically as a 9500)

The other step up to the actual SHp9600 if you want that signature but on practically Steroids… DT 990 at 600 ohms. Post modifications you can get the k702 done right around the $200 range maybe slightly higher… and the 990 is also in the $200 range… this is another reason I say I don’t believe the 9600 is worth more than post $200

Direct upgrades in sound from the shp9500 would probably be something like Shp9500 -> X2 fidelio -> DT 880 -> Sundara -> X3 Fidelio -> 1990 / T1 -> (maximum) HD800S

I think the honeymoon phase has worn off now and after listening to my playlist a bunch of times, comparing them to my other 2 headphones, I’m starting to see the real worth of the 9600.

Soundwise I still think they’re very good but in that $100-$200 price range there are better options to consider like the dt880 black se. What @Falenkor has written up I pretty much agree with so instead of writing up my own review I’m just gonna do a couple of quick comparison between the 9500 and the dt880 black se.

VS. 9500:
One thing I noticed about the 9600 is that because of the bass boost the 9600 loses a bit of midrange details and air. Sometimes the 9600 feels a bit closed in like if it was a closed back headphone. You can pad swap the 9500 with something like the ZMF Universe Hybrids (my pad of choice) or Dekoni Beyer Suedes and get practically the same sound signature but not lose the details and air and also increase the soundstage. Yes, to get there you’ll have to buy some extra stuff but the total amount you’ll be spending for the 9500, pads, and adapters will be about the same as buying just the 9600.

Verdict:
The 9500 win in my opinion because of its better price to performance and versatility.

DT880 Black SE 250ohm:
This version of the dt880 specifically has a v shaped sound signature similar to the 9600. 880 dig deeper in the bass and is a bit tighter. Quantity is about the same. As far as the rest of the frequency response the 880 is more refined and more resolving. It’s airier and has a bigger soundstage and has slightly better separation. The 880 is the true upgrade to the 9500 and I believe is an overall better sounding headphone than the 9600.

Verdict: 880 if you couldn’t already tell. More rigid build and softer materials used.

So at the 9600 current price I no longer think they’re worth it. The only way they would’ve gotten away with that price is if it came with a hard-shell carrying case and an extra shorter cable.

1 Like

I keep forgetting about this particular headphone considering it’s the oddball of the beyers.

Think our thoughts on this are practically the same so definitely agreed.

My only complaint in comparison is that unlike the shp though the DT 880 over there actually sounds a bit more hollow… it’s not very full sounding. Sure the Black variation does add bass and it’s not particularly as bad but beyers definitely aren’t wonderful warm rich headphones with full low end(well… tygrs exist but special exception). I think if you prefer a more full sounding frequency and low end the shp could be a better choice but only in that 1 regard everything else the DT 880 can potentially do better. That hollow sound really comes to light if you change the DT 880’s pads.

I fully believe it will drop in price… and we definitely could use some new adapters for it from Modhouse. X3 on the other hand is rather impressive so I will give philips that one

1 Like

I don’t think I’ve ever noticed a hollowness to the 880. Maybe I’m not as sensitive when it comes to that. The Tygrs I kinda wanna tryout but with some of my heavy metal music have a bassy mix so if a headphone is very full sounding it could make the song sound too boomy. The dt880 black se seem to strike a good balance.

That’s one thing I forgot to mention is that the 9600 can get a bit too boomy with some of my music.

I reasoned this was due to my amp setup but I will agree it can strike rather hard

It’s something I picked up rather early on when I initially had sat with the 880s after sitting long with the 990s. I love the 880s but the lacking fullness / body to the sound steers me away from it. You can of course take steps to remedy this through warmer amps or ideally a tube amp as well as some thicker padding but for me I just wasn’t the biggest fan. Hell I found better sound characteristics out of Sundara than I did the 880s while the Sundara I don’t feel is as clinically accurate or a detail monster I felt the sound was better tuned for the signature rather smooth but the issue with that is of course the company…

In the case of the 880 I found better sound qualities out of the HarmonicDyne Helios than I did the 880 themselves again like the sundara not a detail monster but it was more fun to listen to more relaxed and a better sounding low end then again, perhaps I am rather critical on some sounds than I am of others and a relatively lacking bass is a no go as someone who loves his bass tones listening to orchestra(nier soundtrack being one of those) as well as a lot of rock music… I suppose it really depends what your looking for. I switched ot the 1990 since the 990 was too fatiguing and the 880 just wasn’t quite there and sounded rather hollow.

1 Like

The x2hr is a headphone I haven’t really given a fair shot yet. Last time I heard those I thought they sounded really veiled but I only listened to them for about a couple hours. I’m gonna return the 9600 soon and will probably order the x2hr. A lot of people seem to prefer that headphone and for the price are probably more worth it for most people.

It’s rather nice. I wish the x3 was more similar in that regard. I do have some complaints with it, I have issues with anything as I am rather critical I always see room for improvements lol, such as heat build up, weight, pad swap difficulties, and bass bleed but for a headphone you can find at like $80 - $90 it’s quite nice

Definitely not as tightened up as the 9600

1 Like

First YouTube review of the SHP9600 I have come across! Josh seems to repeat many of the things you all have been discussing, and gives insight into some other. He seems to be quite critical of the massive price increase, and has a hard time deciding whether to recommend the 9600s over the 9500s.

2 Likes

I own the black DT880 250 ohm and they are one of my two go-to for music (along with the TYGR, though I find myself using the TYGR more and more). I agree with your assessment. The main issue I found is that the highs are a bit much and it makes vocals feel recessed. I need to cut down highs quite a bit with EQ before I find these DT880s usable. I also add some bass. The TYGR doesn’t need nearly as much EQ, and I just need to lower the highs a smidge for it to sound great.

1 Like

That’s probably what’s gonna steer me to getting the Tygrs instead. Can’t have a slow bass response especially with the music I listen to. 9600 were still pretty tight but they shelved the bass up at the lower mids which can make it a bit boomy but does add some nice fullness.

Josh pretty much feels the same way as us so maybe we’ll see a price drop very soon.

Just watched this, yeah completely agreed here… It’s a bit absurd what they just pulled in my opinion.

Good to see Joshuas review thanks for posting this. He even mentions the material of the pads I mention as they really aren’t a good quality material.

well that’s unfortunately the thing about the seperate tuning of the Black 250 ohm dt 880 as it has the other tuning that is more similar in characteristics of the DT 990 than the regular 880 which means the vocals are indeed recessed. Not a huge deal break but something I thought I should mention.

Sounds like you may have quite a lot of treble sensitivity whch is unfortunate. I don’t encounter any treble issues on tygr at all and 880 is definitely not real harsh in comparison to something like 770 or 990. Though good to hear you enjoy the tygrs. Since you have that issue where you want the increase the bass but decrease the treble on the tygr as well. Perhaps look into the next step being Nighthawk Carbon this is a bassier yet darker sounding headphone which is essentially what you are doing to the tygr when you eq it like that. Quite nice just hard to find headphone.

9600 has some quite lovely bass not gonna lie but I agree with you it can be slightly boomy. Tygr, not so much. It’s tight and controlled but I wouldn’t ever call it boomy or muddy. Just hard as hell to get your hands on though I did get one ordered it’s going to be in this week. Seems best bet for tygrs for now is contacting beyer directly about getting one.

@JJPablo to sit and watch his review and he is practically spot on in agreement with my own assessment is odd but nice to know I am not the only one that feels this way or hears this headphone in the way I am and I was very glad to see he addressed the gamers viewpoint as well.

3 Likes

I agree! I retired my DT990 Pro and plan to sell it to a friend when I get a chance. Everything just had that artificial sounding glare over it. I think the TYGR is just barely annoying me, mostly on tracks with harsh drum cymbals. I have only have dropped the 8k Hz region by about 2db. I do raise mids for both TYGR and DT880 too, to hear vocals better. I don’t add bass to my TYGR, but have considered cutting a couple of the high bass frequencies (centered at 160 Hz) to clean up the sound like I did on my HD579. In the end I decided against it because I didn’t find the TYGR as “muddy” in those frequencies compared to my HD579. Also, doing so made my TYGR sound too similar to my DT880.

To keep the discussion more on topic, Josh’s review has convinced me that I have no need to look into the SHP9600 unless the price drops to something closer to the SHP9500 and if I need to replace my SHP9500. I barely use my 9500 nowadays anyway. I only use it when I am gaming with friends (using a V-Moda Boom Pro).

yeah, it’s not worth it’s current price point in my opinion right now. You can grab shp9500 for like $45-$50 and the 9600 can’t be properly modified. It’s great I like it more than the 9500’s but not to warrant that price tag… not by any means more than my tygrs.

@JJPablo zeos just got the 9600’s as well so I assume that review will be soon. Will he gush about it or will it be the same is anybodys guess.

understandable, since tygrs are slightly recessed as are the black 250 ohm dt 880’s.

Fully convinced the tygrs are either a full on retuned 990 or 880 as you can definitely make the two sound extremely similar to the tygr with some minor adjustments

1 Like

Beyerdynamic says that it is a retuned 990

Was there actual clarification from them on that? Huh, alright well I was correct then. I had taken my tygr apart and noticed just how similar it was to the 990’s inner workings. With of course minor changes.