I anticipated a price increase with a MKII version, based purely on the apparent onslaught of demand the original twins induced in the community, but yeah…wasn’t expecting them to butt-up against kilobuck range.
Still, showing how sick the prices have been getting for quite some time (truly, unrelentingly so since I entered the hobby 15+ years ago), $1,000 is increasingly becoming part of the “value” or “bang-for-your-buck” segment.
I still have hangups about spending above “nominal” levels on gear that can’t be sourced from US-based dealers, but I’m sure I’ll seriously mull-over taking a chance on the new Monarch.
The bass and mids are excellent with the MK II but the highs have the same somewhat metallic timbre like the Oracle. With both I wouldn’t have expected that viewing the smoothness of their frequency response in the highs.
Did some tip rolling and found the metallic shimmer of the Monarch II to be reduced by tips with a longer and narrower bore. To my surprise the best so far, for my ears, are the double flange tips of the venerable UE TripleFi 10 Pro. They didn’t work for pretty much any other in-ear but with the Monarch II they provide a good seal and improve the highs significantly.
On that basis, why do any of us post or ask the thoughts of complete strangers on a forum.?
His ranking isn’t anymore important than anyone elses and is free to be ignored but for some, it’s a means of shortlisting a product for potential purchase, particularly so since much of ch-fi isn’t available for pre-purchase listening.
If crin didn’t like it, he wouldn’t follow, buy nor listen to the Monarch mkII.
Following/trusting a reviewer us not about being said what to like or not: it is about selecting the products with limited resources (be it time and/or money).
Doing that you may miss the perfect iem for you, but again: one can’t test/buy everything.