šŸ”¶ Tripowin X BGGAR Mele

Some cool guy named Morphon posted this in another forum. Tought it would be cool to share here and might help some people here:

Ok - quick non-scientific comparison.

Tracks:
Sonata 1 in F Major (Yo-Yo Ma and Emmanuel Ax)
My Way, Soon (Greta Van Fleet)
Last Words (GoGo Penguin)
Funky Gospel (Jeff Lorber Fusion)
Holy City (Joan as Policewoman)
Wonderland (Caravan Palace)

All tracks were streamed from Qobuz lossless (and hi-rez when possible). DAC is a SMSL Sanskrit 10th Mk2. Amplified though a DROP+THX AAA-789. I used balanced outs when possible.

All these are comparisons vs MELE (using the Tripowin Jelly cable and Sedna Xelastec tips):

VS Moondrop Starfield (stock cable and tips)
Sonata 1 - Sounds very similar. Fairly equivalent
My Way, Soon - Kick drums less authoritative. Highs are less sibilant. Vocals about the same.
Last Words - Attack on percussion better defined. Highs are rendered with more detail.
Funky Gospel - MUCH less weight on kick drums. ā€œedgesā€ of high percussion much more detectable. Better instrument separation.
Holy City - Bass lines more clean, but without less power. Vocals about the same. Tambourine is much better defined.
Wonderland - Much easier to listen ā€œintoā€ the mix. Bass is a lot less fun. Somewhat harsh on the upper mids.

Verdict - These were less similar than I would have expected from the charts. Starfield has better detail. I think I actually prefer the tuning on the MELE though. Sounds more natural.

VS CCA CA16 (Tripowin Zonie balanced cable and Spinfit CP800 tips)
Sonata 1 - Cello sounds curiously hollow, though the piano has pleasant detail. Cello bow is muted. Weird. I would definitely choose the MELE for classical/chamber.
My Way, Soon - Feels like more detail, but with some treble harshness. All the body sucked out of the vocals. Kick drum is there, but not authoritative (BA bass)
Funky Gospel - MUCH more detail on percussion strikes. Much better instrument separation. BA bass still obvious. Too V-shaped to sound natural.
Holy City - Slightly more sibilant in exchange for a much greater spatial separation and better defined instruments. Slightly metallic edge on horns not there on the MELE
Wonderland - Graphs like it should have more bass than the MELE, but definitely doesnā€™t sound like it. High-frequencies harsh in comparison, but itā€™s much easier to identify all the samples in the mix.

Verdict - MELE tuning wins out again. CA16 has a lot of detail for the price, but you lose out on realism. I think the CA16 would be quite a bit more fatiguing over time.

VS Thor Mjolnir (Tripowin C16 Balanced cable, Sedna Xelastec tips)
Sonata 1 - Greater sense of perceived detail. Piano action clearly audible, unlike the MELE. Bass does not seem overly boosted.
My Way, Soon - Seems bassy in comparison. High percussion is about the same amount as the MELE, but with greater detail (egg shake, for example, is much clearer). Just feels like too much bass to be enjoyable here.
Funky Gospel - Greater treble detail here. Piano is more realistic. Decay on high-hat is much more natural. Distortion limitations of the original recording are detectable.
Holy City - BASS sounds amazing. No loss of detail on the highs. Very clearly difference between solo and backing vocals. Totally coherent and non-fatiguing.
Wonderland - Better sense of air around the vocals. And yes, better clarity on the highs. Easier to hear the samples punch in and out.

Verdict - For being bass cannons, the Mjolnir has a remarkably delicate high frequency range and realistic vocals. I would say if you were fine with slightly more bass, these would be a strong upgrade from the MELE.

VS BQEYZ Spring 1 (Mesh mod) (Tripowin Zonie balanced cable, Sedna Xelastec tips)
Sonata 1 - Starting to get a sense of space around the instruments.
My Way, Soon - Bass is thuddy, not as clean as the MELE. Vocals sound slightly more recessed in comparison to the MELE.
Funky Gospel - More energetic highs. Transients are cleaner. Much wider soundstage.
Holy City - Better sense of balance across the spectrum than the MELE. Sizzles. Super low notes donā€™t resonate as well as the MELE.
Wonderland - Much better separation than anything before it in this list. Bass not as authoritative as the MELE. Highs slightly metallic, though not sibilant. Much more high frequency energy. Exciting, though probably more fatiguing.

Verdict - As you can probably tell, Iā€™m a detail fiend, so the Spring 1 (Mesh mod should sound about the same as the Spring 2) is my cup of tea. I wish the bass were cleaner and more authoritative. I think itā€™s much, much better than the MELE when it comes to micro-details, but is probably 5% behind in tuning, and 15% behind in bass quality.

VS TF10 (unknown balanced cable, Spinfit CP-100 tips)
My Way, Soon - Bass is very light (BA). Highs more splashy (not in a good way). Transient attack is very clear, better than the MELE. Vocals not always distinct.
Funky Gospel - Almost no bass weight (a slap, not a thud). Better detail. Highs too energetic. Will be fatiguing in comparison to the MELE. Soundstage is solid.
Holy City - Snare drum attack more realistic. Bass line is there, but without any impact. Sounds good. Technically better than the MELE, but nowhere near as fun.
Wonderland - Bass is almost as loud, but with almost no weight. Energetic highs overpower the music. MELE is clearly better for this kind of electronic music.

Verdict - This used to be the absolute pinnacle of universal IEMs and itā€™s nice to see it still doing well. Probably not an important comparison.

VS Monarch (stock balanced cable, Spinfit CP-100 tips)
Sonata 1 - Piano hammers are effortlessly present. Bow is more audible.
My Way, Soon - Bass sounds more ā€œcorrectā€ Vocals are almost holographic. Guitar overdubs are more distinct. Bass is much less present, but it has solid weight (not BA bass).
Funky Gospel - Much greater sense of instrument separation. Transients are exquisitely articulated. Recording equipment is audible. Characteristic distortion of the Rhoades piano is more evident.
Holy City - Vocal clarity is much higher. Percussion strikes are perfectly rendered. Bassline is much lower in the mix. Less fun than the MELE.
Wonderland - Bass in this track is above the sub shelf of the Monarch. So while weā€™re basically drowning in detail (all in perfect clarity), there is much less ā€œfunā€ on this track.

Verdict - These are really not trying to do the same thing as the MELE, so the comparison is a bit weird. The Monarch is for finding flaws in a recording. No romanticism. If you have a perfect recording (Like the Yo-Yo Ma album) then youā€™re treated to probably the most realistic and transparent set of transducers Iā€™ve ever heard. If you want to bring the fun, these arenā€™t the ticket, mainly because a lot of rock has the kick drum EQd into higher frequencies so it will be audible on crappy earbuds and car stereos. But for distinguishing between all the different bass components of ā€œCompound Fractureā€ by My Morning Wood, or feeling the floor rattle with a pipe organ, these are the best Iā€™ve ever heard.

So - what about the MELE overall?
I think itā€™s probably the very best sounding options in the bargain/budget range. The BL03 are almost the same price once you put in decent eartips, cable, and case. And the MELE comes with perfectly fine accessories so you donā€™t really need anything other than what comes in the box. It has one of the most fun and pleasing tunings Iā€™ve heard. The only true weakness is detail. While this is especially evident in high-frequency transients, itā€™s also noticeable in blunted snare drums, and the lack of microphone presence in tracks like ā€œIā€™m Just a Kidā€ by Simple Plan. You can get those in the same price range (ish) with sets like the GK10 or CA16, but then you give up a lot of tonality and timbre in exchange.

I mean - so what that the Thor Mjolnir is better in almost every way? It costs 4x the MELE and is almost impossible to purchase. I think in the $15-$50 range the MELE is king. If you can spend TWICE as much for the Starfield, thatā€™s probably the better buy mainly because of the extra detail you get (and like I said - Iā€™m a detail fiend). If you already have a Spring, or one of the Thieaudio Tribrids (or Mangird Tea, or equivalent) then you arenā€™t missing out on anything.

Solid set. Especially for the money. Iā€™m impressed.

10 Likes

Thanks for sharing this post, it is exactly what Iā€™ve been looking for! Iā€™m still waiting for my Mele, but Iā€™m excited to do my own comparisons with the Starfield.

Iā€™m also super happy that the reviewer included an eclectic mix of test tracks - Greta Van Fleet and Yo Yo Ma tracks?? Love it :raised_hands::raised_hands:

P.S. Parov Stelar is a great recc! Thoroughly enjoying it on my Sundara.

1 Like

Seeing some good comparison popping up here and there, just got my Arias, and still on the edge of pulling the trigger for Mele, will keep observing for more insights, the final straw will be the vocals between them, if not that much of a difference, then Iā€™ll move onā€¦(Aria is really growing on me, does everything so damn well, just a tad lean and cold from what i prefer, coming from blon 03 and hd58x)

Judging by graph, Iā€™d say Aria has more mids. For your preference, itā€™s probably a skip.

Does anyone know when Linsoul will announce the Mele giveaway winner(s)? Was it by the end of September?

1 Like

Thanks for the prompt reply!
Not literate about graphs, but they seems close enough, hate to have too redundant gears cause buyers remorseā€™s a bitch, looking at my ca16.

He did a perfect job with his Monarch description. Personally, Iā€™m not even going there VS Mele. Apples and oranges.

1 Like

See thatā€™s the way to incorporate music to express your thoughts on how a set plays back, this comes under ā€œThis thread is for discussion and reviews.ā€ as opposed to a random list of bass tracks that sound ā€˜dopeā€™ :man_shrugging: lol.

4 Likes

No more links here, donā€™t worry

1 Like

Same as me, complete different sets.

Sure, let me help you.

FR is a like a scale. You put somewhere, it gets prenounced, so you get less from somewhere else.

On that specific graph, as you can see, mids are pretty close, because the graph his set to be normalized at 1k Hz. Mids will look the same, but since Mele has more bass, mids will be slightly more recessed. You pull something up, it gets more in you face, other stuff go behind.

Let me paste this here to help you understand. Iā€™ve normalized it @ 50hz:

When you put them at the same output level @ 50hz, you get slight less mids and even slighter less treble, but itā€™s there. You also get less sub-bass. It comes out as preference on the tuning. Aria will probably sound slighly more detailed but with less slam. Libraries and preferences will set this up for each one.

FR isnā€™t hard to read, but only tell half a story. You can judge timbre, technicalities, coherency, etc. A perfect example is my favourite IEM, Mangird tea. Most people look at this graph and just roll over. They will say no bass, no treble, bla bla bla:

Strong point of mangird Tea is mids. Just look what happens when I normalized it @ 200hz:

If you have more questions, please let me know, Iā€™ll help you.

6 Likes

Are legacy 4ā€™s considered fast when it comes to bass? Or are l2ā€™s just way better on that front? ( I know the quantity of midbass is not that high but was wondering)

Hey there, I find your way comparing different IEMs on the graph interesting. May I ask does what does each @Hz mean? Like why do you set @50Hz for Aria and Mele but different for the other comparison which included Tea?

The Hz are frequencies. The further to the right, the higher notes you get.

Nymz normalized to certain frequency values just because they made the lines show what he wanted to show. The normalizing values arenā€™t that important, since everything in these graph is relative.

By convention, many people normalize at 1kHz, but you can normalize at another frequency if it helps you visualize/show some differences.

3 Likes

So it doesnā€™t necessarily mean normalising @200Hz shows the difference in the Mids?

The Legacy 4 has an updated DD past the Legacy 3 and Theiaudioā€™s first tribrids. The Oracle and Excalibur adopted the Legacy 4ā€™s DD design. The Legacy 2ā€™s DD is beryllium coated and sounds substantially different than all the other Thieaudio DD designs.

1 Like

So on the left hand side of the graph is the decibels (loudness). So normalizing is having the loudness at a certain frequency be the same. Where you normalize gives a way to compare the relative differences in how loud each frequency is from a known point.

So if you adjusted the volume of 2 IEMs so a 1000Hz frequency was the same the relative frequencies around them would be at a different level then if you adjusted them to be the same at 200Hz. Due to different sound signatures.

I think you missed the point. When you elevate something, youā€™ll hear more of that frequencies and less on the rest. Think of the graph as an Equalizor. Up and down is decibels (volume) and left and right are frequencies. You can see in the graph the labels Sub-bass/mid-bass etc.

I normalized at 200hz just to prove a point. at the same volume matched at 200hz, youā€™ll hear more mids on Tea > Aria > Mele.

Like Tk said, itā€™s prety standard to normalize at 1K, before the pinna gain. I just made it to prove a point. You can look it as you need it to. I usually focus on how mids and mid bass are displayed on a graph because I know what my prefered target is.

2 Likes

Ooooh I see I seeā€¦ Thanks guys another new knowledge :grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes: :+1:

1 Like

Np. If you or any other person have doubts about graphs, Iā€™ll try to help the best as I can. Just drop me a PM or something

1 Like