šŸ”¶ FiiO FH3 2BA 1DD

Very excited to join the FH3 family - have a set that should arrive in mid February from Amazon.

That said, I am a bit anxious about the mixed reviews regarding sibilance/treble spikes on the FH3. I tend to prefer a very smooth and warm sound signature with well articulated (or even emphasised) bass and tamed highs like the Audeze LCD-2, Focal Elegia and the Sennheiser HD6XX.

IEMs Iā€™ve owned and enjoyed in the past include Shure SE215, BLON BL03, Noble X and the RHA T20i. I also own a pair of Tin T2s and while I do like them - there are certain songs where the ā€˜Sā€™ sounds can get just a touch too high for my tastes.

Can anyone comment on the treble peaks/sibilance on the FH3? Are there any other IEMā€™s I should consider instead? The Ikko OH1, OH10, Moondrop Starfield and the Thor Mjƶlnir were also IEMs that were on my shortlist.

Lz a7
Sony XBA-N3

Are some other iems that are tamer with the treble than the fh3.

Since the tin t2 was only a touch too much for you, I doubt you will have problems with the fh3. But I canā€™t say for sure since I havenā€™t heard the T2.

2 Likes

Really appreciate your fast and helpful replies on this forum! :slight_smile:

Thatā€™s reassuring, hopefully Iā€™ll enjoy them as much as everyone else seems to be. Will post some impressions when they eventually arrive.

1 Like

Thanks, you just had good timing in asking lol.

1 Like

I love this iem truly, Iā€™m hoping the FD5 fixes that BA transient though

It sure doesnt have that BA timbre the FH3 has in the mids/treble. Well, pretty obvious since it is a single DD. :joy:

1 Like

Thank goodness Iā€™m ready for some natural BUT not dark timbre

Dark timbre? I think you are mistaking timbre for tonality. The timbre is correct and very natural, tonality wise it leans a bit towards brightness but not too much and Is able to adapt to the tonality of the song.

2 Likes

Could be, that sharpness, I still want the detail just the ability to turn up

It has a ton of details. But I say if you listen very loud, it could be a problem with the treble quantity. Due to the fletcher Munson curve.

2 Likes

This is really promising! I donā€™t find the BL-03 to be fatiguing or sibilant at all and if Iā€™m reading the graph correctly, it seems that the FH3ā€™s treble follows that of the BL-03 quite closely. Really looking forward to receiving my set! :star_struck:

3 Likes

lol, I think of BA timbre as a type of ā€œcrispinessā€ in the tonality that I donā€™t hear with single DD sets. BA timbre is again just another lens to enjoy your music through. Some might even consider it sounding more ā€œdetailedā€ than a single BA. The thing with BAs that I hear is there is usually a better sense of layering and imaging than a single driver for whatever reason.

1 Like

Youā€™re reading it properly. The BL03 is an extremely well tuned IEM for itā€™s price. I have a few of them. It is not a technical IEM. The bass is bloated, slow and undefined. Mesh mod is said to help. It also has a very shallow fit which can be challenging to get a proper seal. Everyone should have 1 at its price.

2 Likes

Thatā€™s good to hear - I was more concerned about the FH3 potentially being sibilant / exhbiting treble peaks but based on the above comparisson Iā€™m guessing I wonā€™t have any issues with it, given how closely it matches the BL03.

Do you think the FH3 is a good upgrade from the BL03?

Depends on what you listen to. If you listen to old recordings, Youtube, lossy MP3s, donā€™t care about detail or HIFI, donā€™t have quality amp/dac/dap, the BL03 might be all anyone would want or need. Then again, you canā€™t expect much from such a cheap IEM in the Blon. It is impressive for what it is no doubt.

The FH3 has much better detail, much wider soundstage and imaging, the bass quality is in a completely different league than the BL03. The fit, accessories, build and design are a huge improvement over the BL03, but you need to be listening to music that can take advantage of those improvements. That means high quality lossless recordings, quality dac/amp to scale with better IEMS.

You canā€™t expect a $1,000.00+ IEM to make a 40 year old record player playing a record recorded 50 years ago that was found in a basement that has seem multiple floods to work miracles.

The accessories, tips and cable that come with the BL03 are bad. And thatā€™s being nice.

Most people donā€™t care about any of this stuff we obsess over. Everything is subjective so itā€™s difficult to make suggestions to anyone about anything because everyone has different values. What is 10% wider soundstage worth to you? A dollar? $100? $1000?

3 Likes

Also very good to hear, thanks for sharing your thoughts! I do understand and appreciate the importance of source files, I have a setup that Iā€™m quite happy with at home - KEF Q100s + Audeze LCD-2 + Focal Elears driven by a Topping MX3 and a Centrance DAC Mini, looking at upgrading my ā€˜on the goā€™ and ā€˜at workā€™ setup with the FH3. After a long and disappointing quest to find high end closed back headphones that I enjoy, I think IEMs are just a better option for the use cases mentioned.

I also have a Meizu Hifi dongle coming my way (non pro, pro is sold out everywhere and might be discontinued). If its unsatisfactory, I might invest in a BTR5 or a BTR3k, my phone struggles to provide enough juice to even drive the BLON.

Interestingly, the biggest difference in using a DAC + Amp that Iā€™m able to hear comes through IEMs and not the headphones I own.

1 Like

I too own many high-end headphones. None of them can reproduce the low frequencies or overall detail my IEMs seem to do with ease. My Lawton modded Fostex TR-X00s come the closest. I have three of them all with different cups. Highly recommended if you want proper bass in a closed back. Theyā€™re just not that detailed, but they do bring the bass. I prefer the sound of IEMs but sometimes I just donā€™t want something stuck in my ears. I also go through spurts where my tips just wonā€™t fit in my ears properly, like my ears dry out or my ear canal might be changing size.

I did manage to trial the Fostex TH610 and I really did love them - however the semi-closed design meant that it leaked audio which made it unsuitable for a quiet office :frowning:

IEMs FTW then or a good noise cancelling set like Sony or Bose.

1 Like

Hi, iā€™ve got Blon BL03, FH3, tin T2&T4, Starfield, tempotec idsd plus (and HD pro).
FH3 is, imo, a big upgrade from the Blon. It much more detailed, clearer sounding. I use Spinfit CP145 and a tempotec idsd plus Dac, and the FH3 sounds realy clear and clean.
It has the brighness, the lively sound, that the Starfield and, even more, the Blon lacks.
And the bassā€¦ firstly i would say that the FH3 has less sub-bass than the Blon and as much as T4 and Starfield. They are not bassy iem, they have a bit more mid bass, so more impact.
Of course it depends a lot / the recordind (quality and how it was intended to sound).
Where they are fantastic is the details! You can imagine the drumer and where he hits the drums.
Mids are lively, great sounding (might be a bit forward, as the Tin T4, depends of the recording, again;;;). They, as the trebles, are much better, dƩtailed, than the Blon.
Blon are very good for what they are, at their price.
I still love my tin T4, which are very lively too.
Starfield are still very good when you want relaxing moments (tin T2 too), and are an upgrade to the Blon as well.
Soundstage is wide (as much as T2, Starfield, Blon) and deep. Instrument separation, from what i know, is great!
Tonality: they are all differents, all good, with their strenghs and ā€œweaknessā€ (low ones).
If i had to choose one: the FH3, but some could prefer the Starfield.

2 Likes