Looking back on when I had both the anandas and sundaras, the timbre is their best quality, its almost perfect, specially on the anandas, but the tuning is a complete mess, specially on the anandas.
This is completely subjective and to most reviewers agree there is nothing wrong with their tuning but now I trust my ears more than theirs.
on my previous posts in this same thread I still believed more on the reviews than myself, I think the reviewers didnt spend enough time with the product, as its flaws become more evident the more you listen to it.
I had and still have two main problems with the anandas based on listening to them again:
the dynamics are weak to the point I think they rival that of koss ksc75, a much cheaper headphone. I mean both dynamic range and macrodynamics, this results in a compressed sound.
he400i, he400se both have way superior dynamics.
Edit: also want to add some people like a compressed quality to their sound, theres nothing wrong with liking that, for example my dad cant get enough of compressed sounding speakers and files. But if you know you dont stay the f away from the anandas.
The staging is shit, most impressions are âomg the soundstage is so bigâ but after a good listen beneath its size; the instrument placement, separation and panning are so wrong on most songs, unless the engineer mixed with speakers with a somewhat similar tuning, it messes up the recordings.
This staging problem was evident in about 80% of my library, but on the other 20% it was actually very good. My testing music is in very good quality. Yours may vary.
Edit 2: once again, if you dont mind the instruments not being where the recording engineer intended this is not a problem, same goes for the bad panning, its unrealistic but you may like it anyway.
âŠ
Anandas do 2 things right, tonal balance and detail retrieval, but to me the presentation is messed up and I really wish I went with the he6se v2 instead at that time.