Agreed, prior to that the priciest thing I owned was the Tea2.
Actually it does pretty well on the bass. It has great quality, and good quantity of sub-bass, and I really do like the sound and feel of isobaric bass. It has a subtle bass tuck around 250Hz, and when you A/B with sets that tuck more, you notice the extra mid-bass.
The treble and details are there, and to my ears is seems like a Tea2 with more treble extension. It seems to scale well, but I am not a big volume listener. I am betting for people who like loud, the bass gets masked by the treble on the Hype 10. To its credit, that treble is still smooth at volume, but I guess that means it met my expectations of the kilobuck IEM on that.
Bass, and probably more importantly the mid-bass. So many sets shy away, and don’t want to risk making the mids muddy. Arcadia has satisfying bass, and did it without major sacrifices. If you want treble extension Arcadia is probably the wrong set for you, but it waits until the mid-teens to rolloff the treble, so it is still there, just not too forward, which probably means they scale well too.
I thought Arcadia did a lot of what the Explorer did right, but still gave sufficient treble at lower volumes. My guess is that there is a lot overlap in the fans of those two sets.
I mostly listen to classic rock and prog rock ( Zeppelin, Rush, Yes, Jimi Hendrix, Greta Van Fleet, Pink Floyd, Steely Dan, Fleetwood Mac, & Eric Clapton ). So I want mid-bass for the bass guitar, and keyboards. While HBB and I have a ton of overlap in our libraries, I don’t listen to as much hip-hop, so I tend to prefer the glide bass tunings over the tucked.