Let's talk about computers

it’s gonna happen. Intel rested on their laurel’s until AMD released their Athlon 64 CPU’s that actually beat them. the results? all the might / power that Intel held was put into use and they created the beginnings of the Core processors that were an astounding 30 - 40% faster than what AMD had. and then AMD stumbled with their Bulldozer / Steamroller/ etc etc etc, trying out a CPU design that followed the Pentium 4 theory and failed miserably even their top end CPU was often beaten by the lowly i3. buuut…Intel went back to sleep (well, more didn’t prioritize solving the issues with their 10nm designs), and so the cycle starts again. though this time, a lot of other variables are at play.

it was Intel’s misstep on dealing with their 10nm problems that really got them to where they are now. 10nm was supposed to arrive 5 years ago. and in that 5 year spread, Intel had to give AMD a $5 Billion dollar settlement, who the new CEO put to good use. Intel is also suffering because of all the exploits, which suffer from significant performance hits when patches to mitigate are applied. I expect we’ll get a round of predictor vulnerabilities with AMD in the next bit…but Intel was sloppy.

It isn’t, they produce nVidia processors too.

2 Likes

it’s not. TMSC is doing very well…they’ve just started working on the 2nm process as they’ve got the 5 and 5+ spooling up already! using TSMC allowed AMD to focus all their resources into CPU design. they weren’t distracted by other things that would have been like a 1000 cuts.

1 Like

Exactly!!
Its Intels choice to produce them themselfs xD

Still have me an Athlon 64 x2 :stuck_out_tongue:

1 Like

anyone remeber Intel64?

Yeah, Intel would like you to forget that. AMD 64 was just so much better.

Are you talking about the Itanium…err, Itanic? :wink:

haha Amd did it first and was simply superiour haha

oh yes…I have a niggle in my memory when I read 64bit Prescott…though I don’t recall anything, but a dim light went on, LoL!

Remember this?

Remember the Intel Core 2 Quad?

1 Like

Now thats slightly less sexy than boobs xD

How is this then?
Chaos in your pants?
image

2 Likes

Delidded Cpus are just soooo good loooking and I dunno why lol. Just sooo appealing.

:fire::fire::fire:

I do. in fact, I am refurbishing two Mac Pro 3.1’s running dual quad core Harpertown / Penryn CPU’s. despite the fact these CPU’s are 12 years old, they still have more horsepower than the latest / greatest Y mobile CPU’s from Intel. now that’s not exactly something to boast about…except for the fact that with 8 cores, these Mac Pro’s will still be awesome surfing machines.

they’ve both got 32GB of RAM, I’m putting in a 480GB SSD and waiting on some Quadro 4000’s from a customer that’s got em as extra’s. the 8800 GT and x1900XT they came with are rather pitiful. like 10% the performance of the Intel UHD 630 while consuming 100x the power! LoL!

I want to get my hands on something based on the Power architecture at some point.

I have me an 9800 GTX that still works haha sometimes, its tempermental all it neeeds is to be blasted in the cooker and it may decide to work again. Hahaha, obviously not being used now but still have it somewhere.

you mean the old RISC chips? they finished off using the G5 before jumping to Core, if I recall correctly.

Something like this:
https://www.raptorcs.com/TALOSII/

okay, so you weren’t meaning the old Mac’s on RISC. IBM is very invested into their RISC designs…but I haven’t a clue about how their chips are used or who even uses them, other than enterprise level solutions.

on the side, I can’t recall who released it, but someone open sourced their RISC architecture for the community to use. will be interesting to read news about how that progresses and starts moving into notable positions for use and deployment.