I hope youāre talking about the regular B2 . My B2D has way too much bass imo, itās a little fatiguing. Sound is a bit more ushaped than I like. Vocals donāt sound too great to me either.
I wish I had money to throw. I would buy the oxygen, tea, Kato, falcon pro and timeless 7hz to see if I can finally find iems I like more than the starfields.
I would have never gone down this rabbit hole if I knew it was gonna be so hard to find better iems than the starfields. Iām like a grand in at this point I think.
Would it make sense to normalize the Tea FR at 100/200Hz to make it a more fair comparison with other IEMs?
For example, below I compare Tea to O2 and I raised the TEA frequency by 4dB so it matches the O2 at both 100Hz and 200Hz. We can see clearly that the TEA has more sub-bass and more mids and clean low treble.
Does this make any sense?
I think thatās exactly what you want to do, but not whyā¦ Iād say itās a matter of volume matching the whole spectrum rather than matching any individual frequency.
Yeah, the one person who I know got these told me they donāt sound good either. Very good on the technical side but the sound signature is super imbalanced apparently. So I guess Iām between the mangird tea and falcon pro?
Yes. Play with it, explore. Even before i knew ehat was what, I pressed all the buttons just to see what happened. Tea got me into graphs because of it. Its very hard to explain Teas by words and a graph because itās a strange one
Iāve been doing that as of late. Iāve been getting rid of stuff I donāt use anymore. I spend my time with mostly 1 iem a day, sometimes I switch for reviews and comparitions, but thatās about it. Thatās why Iāve settled on having 4 to 6 iems maximum when end-game reached, with not all of them being expensive (like teas).