That minor quibbleā¦
Seriously, what a huge F-up.
But you get what you pay for, I guess. 
yeah. It was advertised as a āno dacā modelā¦ so I was very surprised to see it there in the first place. Amp still sounds spectacular. So no complaints from me.
2 Likes
If I remember correctly, this was a B-stock unit. It sounds like you got a great amp on a good deal.
Iām jelly. 
3 Likes
Will say as far as the amp is concerned, itās definitely the most Iāve wanted to use my headphones and listen to music. Now I just have to decide if my next purchase will be that Denafrips Ares 2 DAC or Iām considering on just getting a turntableā¦ but will probably decide towards the end of the month.
3 Likes
Youād have to spend a whole lot more to get a better performing solid state, imo.
Anecdotally, HEDD used the Phonitor E during the R&D of their much anticipated HEDDphone. This was confirmed by Taron at forum.headphones.com. I think this says a good deal about the amp you have.
1 Like
Torq wrote a really positive review of the Focal headphone ampā¦ saying he enjoyed the Clears more in certain circumstances through it than even his reference setupā¦ which I believe is the Phonitor XE with the RME Dac
2 Likes
The Amp seems to be really well made and super clean on the soldering and parts placement. Getting the 2 because of the Features (And the VUs, Iām a sucker for those, could get the X but the 2 seems to have slightly more features and more expanded features at the cost of a balanced output and 200 bucks more for the x).
Also gives me hope for the 2 since it seems certain parts can be easily replaced/repaired since itās likely the same circuit concepts are used in their higher end stuff (the way the components are put on the PCB for instance is very friendly to soldering irons vs the DAC PCB which I wouldnāt dare touch with a normal iron), so if anything goes wrong since Iām buying refurbished it can be more easily replaced or even upgraded to higher quality components, Except again, the DAC module since that probably need hot air soldering stuff, but the 2 doesnāt have that so I could get away with using a more traditional soldering iron, yippee.
Wouldnāt touch any relays in there though, more likely get better higher tolerance resistors (need to see if the ones in the unit are intentionally designed for wirewound impedance or if theyāre for non impedance) and lower ESR caps for the hell of it (although the ones used here seem to be good either way), maybe some better diodes for better rectification too, although transistorized units like this tend to have the biggest differences in changing the actual Transistors from what I could imagine, but probably wouldnāt go that far since at that point Iād just be changing the sound instead of simply refining it somewhat (if there would even be a noticeable difference however since this is a higher end Solid State and not a tube).
Besides if the e looks this good internally Iāll probably not have any issues with the 2 when I get it or even care for buying higher end components (which may just be boutique at this point honestly).
Also srsly though, is there a difference between the 2 and the X besides balanced output, is it too major because I can get either one at this point but rather save a bit on the 2 and the 2 seems to have some more sound shaping features. I mean idk, what would you recommend, Balanced Output at the cost of less of those sound shaping features, or keep the features and simply enjoy the variety that features allow?
Welp nvm, both the 2 and the X have been sold off before I could get the money. Shame but I guess Iāll just go with the e then.
1 Like
They seriously sound so close itās really hard to tell them apart
2 Likes
Well thatāll be great but they sadly sold both of the ones I were considering, Iāll settle with the e I guess or just wait for another lucky break, I mean my money aināt going anywhere.
Wait nvm, found it, I got confused with another listing, lucky day again then, went down 100 in price.
Also Also 2 vs Model 2730? any Difference or is one older than the other?
Oh Saw the Difference between the two, the 2730 is Long, like, Long Long, Longer than a Torpedo III long.
Is there really any reason to get the larger models over the āeā? I read SPL believes the amp themselves should sound āidenticalā and the large models are more for the featuresā¦ complex analog crossoversā¦ etc.
1 Like
The features and io pretty much, they both sound so close. If you are actually doing studio work the 2 will have more value to you
1 Like
The VU :3, Hail the VU
4 Likes
haha, of course, the VU
2 Likes
The 2730 is good but older, but I do prefer the newer 2
1 Like
Yeah, besides the 2730 is Looooooongggg af compared to the 2.
He become the long boi, but how do he do it?
1 Like
I will say using the presets that come with the SPLā¦ which I guess can be considered a sort of ādemoā of the real thingā¦ the crossover works very well. It actually just moves the sound-stage forward, without any weird negative effects Iāve typically heard with DSPsā¦ like the Dirrac surround crossover on the Monolith THX 788 DAC AMP. This crossover sounds a lot more natural
2 Likes
He has several setups. Preferences are dependent on several factors-including music, and headphones used, but I think he really enjoys his Chord Dave.
These are all assumptions Iāve made from what Iāve read, and any discussions and interactions on the forum. I canāt speak for him.
Yeah good analog features like that just sound more natural imo