Yes it will work very well imo.
Alrighty then, thank you for answering
1 Like
So after getting a RNHP not long ago I tried the i3 and the result is Imo impressive, damn these Iems really scale very well. In my Dx160 they sound very nice, with the xDuoo XD-05 + better but with the RNHP they are simple superb.
3 Likes
I know thx is maligned due to how lifeless they can sound, but have you tried on a AAA amp?
I did plugged them in my SP200 but I didn’t have it grounded and I had a buzzing so no, couldn’t try them
The engrish though:
First, I thought they’re not even planar.
“a high-quality balanced armature driver. which uses a flat diaphragm”
I thought it’s a special type of balanced armature which uses a flat diaphragm.
It is a planar, it needs lots of power to sound its best. In the xDuoo XD-05 + high gain 12 o’clock which is the same power I use with the TH-X00 which have a 94 dB/mw sensitivity.
2 Likes
Do you guys reckon that the qudelix 5k on balanced will be enough to drive the TRI i3s?
And on another note, will it be worth it to get a balanced cable for the TRI i3s? (specifically the Tripowin c8)?
Ooh… didn’t know there was a thread for the TRI I3 here. This IEM is amazing, it’s still my favorite IEM. I still haven’t hooked it up to a proper source (even though now I have one - am just too busy 
)
The review is back from June, so it was a time where I included some “enthusiasm” in my reviews, but regardless, I still hold the same opinion about the sound performance. And yes, you need a powerful source to drive them properly!
Either way, this IEM is amazing, and maybe my review will be of use to someone, so here it is:
With the many brands in the Chinese audiophile market, KBEAR is one that I would pay special attention to. You may be more familiar with their single dynamic in-ear monitor - Diamond, or perhaps their F1 balanced armature model. One model which you should pay closer attention to is the TRI i3 - a hybrid setup that features three drivers; hence the name TRI i3. I found the combination of the three drivers to have quite a performance. Let’s clarify what type and size of drivers it is using:
A single 10mm planar magnetic driver + an 8mm Composite Dynamic driver + a Balanced Armature driver.
Let’s dive deeper into the TRI i3
Unboxing experience - Minimalist and simple
“Less is more” is how I felt with the TRI i3. A very simple black box (with some glitter/shimmer effect), one logo on the front, one label with the specifications on the back. That’s all it takes. No marketing labels/visual material. It almost felt like a luxury car unboxing, like the one of a key to an expensive car. There are no flashy and unnecessary graphics, just a stealthy black box.
What’s in the box?
The presentation was very straight forward. I like how KBEAR chose not to use gigantic boxes (which waste both materials, and space). KBEAR TRI i3 came with a pre-attached cable and a carrying pouch which holds the extra ear-tips. The carrying pouch is made out of a soft, velvet-like material, and it’s in a brown color.
I already spoke with Mr. Bairon (the owner of KBEAR) about some suggestions - I personally preferred the hard carrying case with the KBEAR Diamond, and also the presentation was better with the Diamond… although it was a larger packaging which did take more space than needed. I’ll speak about my (non-biased) experience and some information about Mr. Bairon in the following section.
What you get in terms of the ear-tips are two sets (S/M/L) of silicone ear-tips - one white, one grey. The white ones have a more straight and short shape, while the grey ones implement a more circular (breast-like) shape. This being said, the grey ones are taller, and they were the ones I preferred. You also get a pair of foam tips in a light-grey color. And to finish it on a positive note - no bad smells were present during the unboxing.
As always, here is everything you get in the box in a formal format:
1x carrying pouch
1x TRI i3
1x MMCX cable
1x S/M/L set of white silicone ear-tips
1x S/M/L set of grey silicone ear-tips
1x pair of foam ear-tips
Mr. Bairon and how he deals with business
I had a chance to communicate directly over email with Mr. Bairon, and I have some respect for the man. Before I go on, I want to state loud and clear: this opinion doesn’t put any bias or alter my experience with the TRI i3, it’s just to show some respect for someone who deserves it. It is entirely based on my observations and speculations.
He is somebody who seems very humble, and the part which I respect the most: he accepts criticism and feedback. In the business world, this is something that is almost completely absent. When you are a business, especially an owner of an earphone/headphone/speaker company, the most important thing is that you listen to the users. There are a lot of owners who believe their product is the best and will either get offended or attack you if you give them criticism and feedback. Unfortunately, it’s a common issue. I am very happy to see somebody go the right way about their business. I personally gave some feedback and suggestions to Mr. Bairon - he listened and said he would be implementing it in his next product.
Mr. Bairon is somebody who works with the community. However, I don’t think anybody actually did enough to bring this to attention. Some people did and they are: B9Scrambler (thecontraptionist.blog), NymPHONOmaniac (nobsaudiophile.wordpress.com and also owner NBBA group on Facebook), and Otto Motor (one of the tuners, author at audioreviews.org) himself. For KBEAR’s Diamond model, Otto Motor and KopiOkaya (author at audioreviews.org) helped with the tuning, while Slater (author at audioreviews.org and active Head-Fier) suggested the name. It’s nice to see that Mr. Bairon is able to be in touch with the community… taking it a step further by involving some community members to bring his product to life.
It is clear that Mr. Bairon listens to feedback, and I can only see his company becoming bigger and better. KBEAR and TRI haven’t disappointed yet.
Build quality
One of the first impressions I got with the TRI i3 was how well built it is. “Life in plastic, it’s fantastic” is the complete opposite of what the TRI i3 has to offer - not a single plastic piece was used in its construction. The only plastic used was on the chin slider (c’mon you cannot take this into consideration), all other parts were made out of metal.
I tried to find something which I didn’t like regarding the build quality. Something like a flaw, but I simply couldn’t find it. I was very pleased with the CNC aluminum alloy construction of the shells, the thicker metal grill, the metal housing for the MMCX, the metal housing of the Y-splitter, the metal housing of the 3.5mm jack.
The only thing which could be improved would be to have a metal chin slider (the same design of the chin slider on the Diamond). Another suggestion (based on my personal preference) would be to have a smaller housing for the 3.5mm (or 2.5mm) jack. I think that it’s more functional to have a smaller housing, it is also sleeker. It’s not as though the housing is too big, it’s more about the length of it, I think that shorter + sleeker ones are not only sexier but more functional - you never want a large “thing” sticking out of your source. At least I don’t, I don’t know about you.
Design - Silver Surfer?
I was thinking to myself: T-1000 (from Terminator 2) or the Silver Surfer? I made the conclusion that it was more like the Silver Surfer. Why? I guess that the Silver Surfer was more silver and shiny… but also more organic.
On a serious note, KBEAR did an excellent job regarding the design. The shells are gorgeous. They have a very organic shape with nice curves. I can say the same about the cable, highly flexible, and of great quality. The cable follows the standards in the industry (in terms of labeling) - red is right, blue is left… oh wait. In this case, it’s clear, but as long as you have one Red/Blue, you will know which one is which. Let’s not forget that the cable is a MCMX 4-core single crystal-copper silver-plated cable. Phew… that was almost like a chemistry element. On a good note, I like how the MCMX connector stays in place and doesn’t rotate too easily. I wish this was a standard with MCMX connectors (usually they are flimsy and spin all over the place)
I appreciate the subtle branding. There isn’t one place where you have KBEAR or TRI logo screaming at you. There is only “TRI” engraved on the Y-splitter, and it reminds me of Final Audio’s branding (in a positive way).
I already mentioned this, but the only thing that I would change would be the included carrying pouch, the one with the Diamond is more functional and convenient.
Comfort
Those who heard my opinion about my first impressions (only based on 20 minutes with the TRI i3 that I spend when I received them) will know how I feel about the comfort aspect. These are among the most comfortable IEM’s despite their large size. They definitely have a nice weight to them, and you can feel them in your ears.
Ergonomics are 10/10 for me, the fit is perfect and the seal is tight like it should be. The angle of the nozzle and size of the nozzle also suit my ear, it’s very rare to find an IEM which has perfect fit out of the box. It only took me once to change the ear-tips (to the grey ones), and I knew they were the ones.
I don’t remember seeing this is any other IEM, but with the TRI i3’s nozzle (which has a lip), I discovered that you could get two different placements of the ear-tips: one which goes to the bottom of the nozzle (this should be the intended way, since the ear-tips goes below the lip which holds them). In this placement, the nozzle is closer to your ear canal. The second way to place the ear-tips is where they go the bottom of the lip (up to the lip). Mr. Bairon said that he intends people to wear them in the 2nd type of placement (where ear-tips go up to the lip), he said “Sound is more smooth and natural”.
I find this very interesting and pleasing, although I believe that KBEAR didn’t do this intentionally. Usually, the lip is located at the very top of the nozzle, but in TRI i3’s case, it’s placed in the middle of the nozzle. Either way, I like it and would suggest KBEAR to implement this “feature” in their future products.
I do have to say that this is one of the most comfortable IEM’s which I had in my ears.
Driver Flex
None. Always appreciate no driver flex
Sound
Lows
The bottom end is well defined, although not quite balanced. The sub-bass is more dominant than the mid-bass, hence why the mid-bass can be lacking the definition and punch at times. It isn’t as tight and present (mid-bass) as you would expect from an IEM of this size.
You have to keep in mind that the TRI i3 features a planar magnetic driver, this means that a good source is a must. I found myself using the Tempotec Serenade iDSD for the majority of the time.
I find it (bass response) heavily depending on the genre, and it varied from song to song - In “Exhale (feat. Sia)” by kenzie, the bass is quite “aggressive” and has a very nice weight, while in some hip-hop (or trap) songs you can feel the lack of the punch.
On a positive note, the TRI i3 is the only IEM that was able to produce the thump in the introduction of “Do I Wanna Know?” by Arctic Monkeys. This is where I initially fell in love with it.
I loved how the TRI i3 kept up with the bassline in Kendrick Lamar’s “LOYALTY. FEAT. RIHANNA.”, it could reproduce the weight and body of the bassline. Overall the bottom end has very good weight, however lacks definition and punch, this is definitely something KBEAR can perfect. And I know that KBEAR is capable of getting it right.
“Lux Aeterna” by Clint Mansell is also a gorgeous composition to listen to for the lows (even though they are very subtle). I think that TRI i3 would benefit from a sub-bass extension (and also perfecting that mid-bass response) Interestingly enough I found that Jade Audio EA3 (my daily driver for the past 6 months) was able to hit lower notes - even in Lux Aeterna, you can notice it. While not a valid comparison, I would still love to see a KBEAR product that is able to reproduce the low region better.
Mids
I have to say that this might be the best region (besides the soundstage) of the TRI i3. I really enjoyed its vocal performance and representation, I would say that they have very present mids. The timbre and overall tonality of the TRI i3 are done very well, it’s able to produce a very accurate sound of the instruments (although it lacks the lower and top-end extension to make the whole mid-range perfect). I do have to say that the mids are leaning towards the warm sound signature. The edge or sparkle is what has been softened.
While I did find them enjoyable for long-listening sessions, I did find the mid-range to be lacking dynamics - I’ll go over this in my conclusion. Mids are slightly forward and more present. This creates a fuller sound characteristic, more “crowded” if you will.
I strongly believe that the sound performance as a whole could be more lively if I found the correct source. I do have to say that the sound performance is a bit lifeless and “flat” (not referring to the frequency response) without the bottom end and top end of the mids.
I came to this conclusion after spending time with the TRI i3 - there isn’t one particular track where this is prominent. I could reference the same tracks as in my previous reviews; In “Bohemian Rhapsody” by Queen - a highly energetic track. Specifically, at mark 2:17 there should be more of the top end present, this is something I noticed through other songs where vocals are also energetic and “intense”. The same goes for “The Winner Takes It All” by ABBA or several tracks from Lana Del Rey.
This is something exclusive to my personal preference. Take a very clear note of this, because TRI i3 has a very good mid-range performance. I myself like to feel some parts of music. What can happen if you feel (a trait of lower bottom end, and higher top-end) is fatigue. KBEAR went the safe way and didn’t do that. I think the majority of people prefer this sound signature, and this is something you should be aware of. Even though it didn’t meet up to my personal preference, it definitely wasn’t bad. I actually did enjoy using the TRI i3 a lot, especially for vocal tracks. It’s just being nit-picky, that tiny piece which is missing to the puzzle - the piece which puts it all together. What am I trying to say here? The mid-range performance is good!
Highs
While the TRI i3 doesn’t provide the sparkle and energy of the top-end, it is definitely not warm. It has a very clean treble performance, very pleasing to the ear. The top-end is rolled off, and thus some of us will find that it lacks sparkle and delivery of some higher notes.
Getting the treble tuned correctly is much harder than some think, you must know where the fine line is - the line where the treble isn’t bright and fatiguing, but also not too rolled off, to the point where you lose the details and energy from the top-end.
I could definitely feel the lack of the top top-end, especially considering that I listen to dynamic songs with open vocals, some intense guitar solo’s, and also music with the presence of instruments such as the piano or violins.
Jo A Ram’s cover of “Soldier of Fortune” is a perfect example. You can feel that there is a lack of some details, as well as lack of that top top-end which defines the violin itself. This can also be felt in a song that I often use for testing - Travis Scott’s “Stop Trying to Be God”. At mark 5:19 (where Stevie Wonder’s harmonica hits its peak) you can notice that the sparkle is missing.
This being said, don’t take it as though the TRI i3 is warm with the mention of treble being rolled off. I am just referring to the highest notes; besides them, the treble response is very pleasant and clean. This will also depend from source to source, it’s very possible that I haven’t found the “match” for the TRI i3 (I am talking about a source here). One thing is for sure - it’s fatigue-free, so you are safe for long-listening sessions. If you don’t mind the sparkle and are looking for a good and clean treble response which mostly isn’t rolled off, then the TRI i3 should be able to satisfy you.
Soundstage
The soundstage is quite large. In some cases, it sounded too realistic… very close to an open-back headphone. Perhaps the eerily realistic “The Dogs of War” by Pink Floyd. Oh boy. It sounds very realistic, as though there is a mysterious creature breathing right behind your left ear.
This is seriously a great track, and I suggest you give it a listen- see whether it’s so realistic to the point where it’s scary. It isn’t? You need either a headphone or an IEM like the TRI i3 to experience it.
Can you imagine what this bad boy would do when watching movies? I’m curious too, I still didn’t have much free time to give any movie a watch.
Another track from Pink Floyd - “Dogs”. The guitar which is panned to the left is positioned slightly back. TRI i3 represents this space very well - like it should since this isn’t a very crowded track.
“Wish You Were Here” - Pink Floyd is another good example. You can hear the acoustical guitar being nice and distant (panned to the left), and another acoustical guitar being closer (panned to the right)
While we are talking about Pink Floyd, we cannot miss the track “Dogs” from their 10th album - Animals. I would specifically like to focus on imaging in this track, particularly from mark 3:48 - 3:59. The way TRI i3 was able to capture the drum rolling, it was a very realistic and accurate representation as to where the drum was. The drums roll around your head, and it’s gorgeous and enjoyable! As some say, it’s a holographic soundstage. Using this exact song, I found that Jade Audio EA3 (which is a much lower priced item) was keeping up with the imaging of the drums quite well (for its price)!
Lastly, how can we not include Fleetwood Mac. Let’s just take their record “The Chain - 2004 Remaster” - Blows your brains out in terms of both imaging and soundstage. The guitar panned to the left goes far beyond the IEM’s themselves. TRI i3 was able to very accurately reproduce that the guitar was located on the left, but it was more than capable of just representing that it was located on the left - it was able to reproduce that it was located behind the vocals. The interesting thing is that here it’s more about the depth than the width; I say this because the guitar isn’t panned far left, rather it’s fairly close to the singer, but it is very audible that it is placed behind the vocals.
I couldn’t find an IEM which was able to compete with TRI i3 in terms of the soundstage and imaging. Jade Audio EA3 could be mentioned only if we took width into consideration… When it comes to depth, it simply couldn’t keep up with the incredible accuracy and representation of the TRI i3.
Conclusion
This is exactly what I wanted to hear from the TRI i3. A very mature performance. I think that the soundstage and imaging alone would be the selling point of these bad boys, but you can’t forget to mention the other fields in which TRI i3 has a very good performance. There is always field for improvement, this is why I took my time to give as much feedback as possible in this review. I think it is crucial, especially for a company that didn’t release many models yet. Most of the critics I gave were given due to the price range of the TRI i3, so keep this in mind.
TRI i3 is a fatigue-free IEM, but that fatigue-free characteristic has its traits. Due to the absence of the top top-end, and the weight and definition of the lower end (mainly mid-bass), TRI i3 can definitely have a much better dynamic range and definition of sound. This isn’t to say that it was bad, actually quite the opposite - it was good. There is always better than the “good”, and I strongly believe you should keep an eye on KBEAR and what models it will release in the future.
I am very pleased to say that I can recommend the TRI i3. It’s a great IEM and one which has a very mature performance, especially in its price range.
Feedback
I will give my opinion and two cents about what can be improved. While the soundstage is huge, what happens in some more crowded tracks is that the sound takes up more space, leaving the sound characteristic to be not very spacious. This doesn’t use the huge soundstage efficiently, as though each note isn’t very defined, thus taking up more space of that soundstage. I strongly suggest that the team focuses on perfecting the soundstage, because it’s about taking advantage of the soundstage - not taking it for granted.
What I did notice is that TRI i3 would greatly benefit from more detail and definition in sound. I found the overall performance to be a bit flat. This is mainly due to the lack of mid-bass definition and quantity, but also top top-end (which contributes to sparkle, this is very important for intense vocals and instruments). Let’s put it like this: What makes a piano key feel like a piano key? I would say that it’s the sonic characteristics of it. When lower notes are hit, you will feel the bottom end of it, while when the higher notes are hit, you will feel that tingly feeling in your ears. This is also known as definition/resolution (“The ability of a component to reveal the subtle information that is fundamental to high fidelity sound” definition by [USER=45168]@fordgtlover[/USER]). You can only achieve this if the IEM is able to produce those frequencies with good clarity and detail. Clarity and detail are what would make the TRI i3 a different kind of performer. I would also recommend putting this field as one of the highest priorities. TRI i3 is only missing that depth to the sound which would take it to a whole different level.
As a quick note - unfortunately, the website which is printed on the packaging “triaudio.cn” isn’t their official website, so that’s a quick heads up. I am not certain about the email, but I would stay safe and be in direct communication with KBEAR - the manufacturer. I can assume that this issue will be fixed with the future products
9 Likes
I have bought these Yesterday, i hope they are very good !
3 Likes
please do tell us your impressions. some have said its a v shape(BGGAR) and some say its balanced while some says its mid forward. idk anymore…
1 Like
It’s really interesting your point, i think it depends by the source and the amp .
2 Likes
However i have to wait at least two weeks.
1 Like
Hey all, I have a question for the I3 owners. I just got my pair and right side has a lot of driver flex from inserting and the slightest movement. Do yours do the same, or should I return and repurchase from Amazon?
2 Likes
I do have the same flexing issue with mine but it doesn’t affect the sound once it sits in place!
1 Like
As @Perrivan said a lot of DD’s in IEMs flex to one degree or another, both my IT00’s and Campfire Vega’s flex but have never been a problem once fitted.
1 Like
Just posted my impressions and review on the TRI I3 on our site!
Do let me know what you guys think of the I3s too! I thought it was quite an interesting pair of IEMs
Driver flex is caused by the shape of the iems, if it has vents and also on your ear canals. If you get it with a specific iem, it wont be “fixed” by getting another unit.
Thank you for the replies. I was just curious since only the right flexes. Experience with my other iems is both sides react the same when inserting. Seal is solid on both sides.
Btw they sound great!
our ears are not identical from L/R, so it is possible to get driver flex on one side and not the other. (I have experienced that.)