Personally I think the Aeolus is a better headphone than the Ether CX. I thought the CX was a little bland. Its a nice headphone, but I wanted a little more from it for the price. Iām not 100% all on board with the Aeolus, but itās definitely not bland
I listen to my Ether CX a lot, but I picked up an Eikon to replace it.
I donāt think the CX is worth $900, it does a lot of things well, but doesnāt really manage to put it together in a cohesive way.
I also have a set of Aeolus on order, looking forward to hearing both, but there are a lot of headphones in Zachās Queue before mine.
The wait is brutal. Iām sure heās exhausted after his November push too. I really like both, but for me it takes about 20 minutes for me to get used to the Aeolusā presentation every time I listen to them. Zeos called it aggressive I think in his review, and I guess thatās accurate. I donāt know of a better word than that anyway. Once I settle in, Iām good, but I still canāt just put them on and chill right away after owning them a month. The Verites are easily the most capable headphones I own, but I think the Eikons may be my favorite for just sitting back and enjoying music
Yes it does
Yes what does?
I was responding to the question about the jot compression, itās there but not super present as the magni or modi
well then i wouldnt want to get that
Itās never been something that I could hear. I even often listen to old recordings and itās always sounded great, I think it also depends pretty highly on the dac module. Most reviews that mentioned compression came out years ago with the old dac module. Itās a great combo for the price in my opinion. However, if the thx 789 was out when I bought it, I easily wouldāve gone with that over the jotunheim. I also do love supporting smaller US companies, hence also why I was okay spending so much on headphones from ZMF over some of the larger companies. Schiits customer service is very legit like ZMF. I ordered mine literally days before the new dacs were added and even though they had already built mine, they called me and asked if I wanted to change out the dac module and even upgrade to the multibit at no cost. You canāt beat the service of the smaller homegrown companies.
Yeah im curious about Schiit and if they offer anything that can compete with the SP200. But i dont like treble colored Amps and Dacs and i dont like compression. Also i dont like R2R dacs.
The asgard 3 competes imo, but they are going for a different type of sound. The sp200 is more anyltical leaning and the a3 is more balanced. The a3 doesnāt really suffer from a poor signature nor a bad sound signature. Also what r2r dac did you hear?
I guess im prejudiced against them. I havenāt heard one. Its based on old tech and seems similar to a tube amp. you know, mess up the sound to get something different. i want a analytical clean uncolored dac.
Itās always best to make up your mind on audio gear without listening to itā¦
lol i know what youre saying but i think the science speaks for itself.
The dac in the jotunheim seems very analytical. Maybe Iām not as well versed in dacs. As long as it gives me a clean signal, Iām good to go. I donāt think I could ever spend so much money on a dac. Like I said, I wish I got a dac separate from my amp for simplicity of switching amps but thatās as far as I am concerned. Itās hilarious watching the guys from schiit talk about their gear though ha. Theyāre so sarcastic.
I think another point to r2r, even though the tech is older is that itās much more simple to make and cheaper. Maybe if I heard a higher tech dac, Iād see the difference, but ignorance is bliss so Iāll stick with my cheaper dacs haha.
The best dacs I have heard so far have been r2r, just saying lol
Well correct me if im wrong but you seem to lean towards more musical, enjoy the music sound. im strictly analytical, cold, uncolored, detail sound.
Iām both lol, I really want as neutral and uncolored as I can get for studio work, since I need stuff to be actually accurate for work. Regarding for listening pleasure I do like a bit more āmusicalā
I think you misunderstand what science is.
Ladder DACās using resistors are going to have linearity issues, the work around is to use multiple ladders to compensate for the errors, their never going to measure particularly well for THD. But theyāll measure better than you can hear, so in what way are they inferior?
Multibit DACās like the Schiits and DACās based on older audio DACās like the one Mon just purchased wonāt have the linearity issue, because those chips are rated to 1/2 LSB accuracy.
R2R DACās introduce no noise into the system that has to be filtered out.
They can also run at much higher frequencies.
DSDACās on the other hand introduce all sorts of high frequency noise, that then has to be filtered out both digitally and in the analog domain.
If DSDACās are the best DACās why for medical applications do they still use 18 Bit R2R on a chip DACās?
So what science exactly?
Audio gear really needs to be listened to.
Whats DSDAC? Direct Stream DAC?
Why do they measure poorly? Are you saying that R2R dacs can be analytical and clean also?